Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| UMC Utrecht | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objectives of this study are i) to assess how heart failure was captured accross different linked electronic health record sources within the CALIBER program and the overlap between primary care, hospital admissions and/or the national mortality register, and ii) to assess risk factors, heart failure treatment and survival in patients, stratified by EHR source.
Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospital admissions and mortality in modern healthcare systems. It can be viewed as a collective clinical syndrome of many signs and symptoms and is frequently the common endpoint of various heart diseases. Often, it is not diagnosed until it has reached a level whereby quality of life is significantly, and often irreversibly, impaired. Even though vast quantities of National Health Service (NHS) data concerning patients with heart failure are recorded, there are limited 'real world' longitudinal insights about the prognosis and consequences of HF. Although linked electronic health records cohorts such as the CALIBER program become increasingly available, for heart failure the overlap, risk factors and subsequent mortality have not been compared. Previous studies on heart failure using EHR sources have used ICD-9 or 10 codes for the identification of heart failure cases and the prevalence estimates of risk factors and comorbidity. Furthermore, the assessment of supporting information for heart failure present in electronic healthcare registries remains largely unknown. Currently, heart failure is typically inferred based on previous reports or the prescription of heart failure related medication. To strengthen heart failure case ascertainment in large electronic healthcare registries, linkages with primary care data such as what is done in CALIBER could allow more detailed insight in medical history, clinical diagnoses, anthropometric measures, health behaviour, laboratory tests, medical procedures and prescriptions.
In this study, the investigators assessed the distribution of recording, supportive medical information for heart failure diagnosis, risk factors and subsequent mortality of heart failure patients captured in linked EHR data from primary care, hospital admissions and/or death registry.
This study is part of the CALIBER (Cardiovascular disease research using linked bespoke studies and electronic records) programme funded over 5 years from the NIHR and Wellcome Trust. CALIBER has received both Ethics approval (ref 09/H0810/16) and ECC approval (ref ECC 2-06(b)/2009 CALIBER dataset).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary care only | Patients with heart failure recorded in primary care and never hospitalized for heart failure | ||
| Primary care and secondary care | Patients with heart failure recorded in primary care with at least one record of a heart failure related hospitalization. | ||
| Secondary care only | Patients with heart failure recorded in at least one heart failure related hospitalization without a concurrent primary care record. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Venn diagram of heart failure recording by data source | Frequency and overlap of heart failure patients recorded in primary care, hospital admissions and as cause of death in the national mortality registry. | 13 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Heart failure mortality | 5 year heart failure cause of death following the first recorded heart failure diagnosis | 5 years |
| Cardiovascular mortality | The 5 year cardiovascular mortality following the first recorded heart failure diagnosis. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
From 1 January 1997, all patients aged ≥18 years old, registered in CPRD practices in England consenting to data linkage, with at least one year of up-to-standard pre-study follow-up are potentially eligible.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stefan Koudstaal, MD PhD | University College, London | Study Chair |
| Folkert W. Asselbergs, MD PhD | University College, London | Study Director |
| Harry Hemingway, PhD | University College, London | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farr Institute, University College London | London | NW1 2DA | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23220717 | Background | Denaxas SC, George J, Herrett E, Shah AD, Kalra D, Hingorani AD, Kivimaki M, Timmis AD, Smeeth L, Hemingway H. Data resource profile: cardiovascular disease research using linked bespoke studies and electronic health records (CALIBER). Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1625-38. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys188. Epub 2012 Dec 5. | |
| 28008698 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Portal to CALIBER research programme | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 5 years |
| All-cause mortality | The all cause mortality 5 years following the first recorded heart failure diagnosis | 5 years |
| Koudstaal S, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Denaxas S, Gho JMIH, Shah AD, Yu N, Patel RS, Gale CP, Hoes AW, Cleland JG, Asselbergs FW, Hemingway H. Prognostic burden of heart failure recorded in primary care, acute hospital admissions, or both: a population-based linked electronic health record cohort study in 2.1 million people. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Sep;19(9):1119-1127. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.709. Epub 2016 Dec 23. |