Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of of rosuvastatin 20 mg compared to placebo for treating Chinese patients with subclinical atherosclerosis.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter parallel group study assessing the effects of rosuvastatin 20 mg treatment for 104 weeks on the change in intimamedia thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA), carotid bulb, and internal carotid artery (ICA) in adult Chinese subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rosuvastatin | Experimental | 20 mg tablets, Daily oral dose |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Matching placebo tablets |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosuvastatin | Drug | 20mg tablets, orally once daily for the duration of the 104-week treatment period |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized Rate of Change in Mean of the Maximum (MeanMax) CIMT Measurements From Each of the 12 Carotid Artery Sites Based on All Scans Performed During the 104-Week Study Period | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the common carotid artery (CCA), carotid bulb and internal carotid artery (ICA). The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. Twelve carotid artery sites were scanned at each visit and the 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for a specific segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements from each of the 12 sites, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCA | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left CCA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yongjun Wang, M.D. | Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University | Principal Investigator |
| Yundai Chen, M.D. | Chinese PLA General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Beijing | 100035 | China | |||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37565307 | Derived | Clezar CN, Flumignan CD, Cassola N, Nakano LC, Trevisani VF, Flumignan RL. Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 4;8(8):CD013573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013573.pub2. | |
| 36017704 | Derived | Zheng H, Li H, Wang Y, Li Z, Hu B, Li X, Fu L, Hu H, Nie Z, Zhao B, Wei D, Karlson BW, Bots ML, Meng X, Chen Y, Wang Y; METEOR-China Investigators. Rosuvastatin Slows Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: The METEOR-China Randomized Controlled Study. Stroke. 2022 Oct;53(10):3004-3013. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031877. Epub 2022 Aug 26. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| redacted protocol | View source |
Not provided
Eligible patients with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements of maximum CIMT ≥1.2 millimeters (mm) and <3.5 mm were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 20 milligrams (mg) or corresponding placebo once daily. Randomization was stratified by ICVD risk (<5% or 5% to 10%).
Chinese patients with subclinical atherosclerosis and a 10-year ischemic cardiovascular disease (ICVD) risk of less than 10% (as assessed by the 2007 China Adult Dyslipidema Management Guidelines) were enrolled at 25 sites in China between 17 September 2015 and 29 January 2019.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Rosuvastatin 20 mg | Rosuvastatin 20 mg was administered in oral tablet form, once daily, for a 104-week (2-year) treatment period. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Placebo was administered in oral tablet form, once daily, for a 104-week (2-year) treatment period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 28, 2018 | Nov 25, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Matching placebo tablets, orally once daily for the duration of the 104-week treatment period. |
|
| From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left Carotid Bulb | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left carotid bulb. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left ICA | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left ICA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Annualized Rate of Change in the Mean of the Mean (MeanMean) CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCA | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left CCA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the mean of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMean CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid, Lipoprotein and Apolipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) | The percent change from baseline at final visit for lipid and lipoprotein measurements (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], triglycerides, non-HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio) and apolipoprotein measurements (apolipoprotein A-I [ApoA-I], apolipoprotein B [ApoB] and ApoB/ApoA-I ratio) was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. In the evaluation of change from baseline (Week 0) to the final visit at Week 104, any missing observations were imputed by LOCF. | From baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid and Lipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Time Weighted Average | The percent change from baseline at final visit for lipid and lipoprotein measurements (LDL-C, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglycerides, non-HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio) was determined by ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. In the evaluation of change from baseline (Week 0), the time-weighted average value was calculated as the value multiplied by the number of days since the last assessment, summed for all observations, and divided by the sum of days between all visits. | From baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| Beijing |
| 100050 |
| China |
| Research Site | Beijing | 100191 | China |
| Research Site | Beijing | 100853 | China |
| Research Site | Bengbu | 233060 | China |
| Research Site | Changsha | 410011 | China |
| Research Site | Chongqin | 400042 | China |
| Research Site | Guangzhou | 510080 | China |
| Research Site | Guangzhou | 510120 | China |
| Research Site | Guangzhou | 510260 | China |
| Research Site | Guangzhou | 510515 | China |
| Research Site | Guangzhou | 510630 | China |
| Research Site | Haerbin | 150001 | China |
| Research Site | Nanchang | 330006 | China |
| Research Site | Nanjing | 210009 | China |
| Research Site | Ningbo | 315010 | China |
| Research Site | Shanghai | 200032 | China |
| Research Site | Shanghai | 200065 | China |
| Research Site | Shanghai | 200090 | China |
| Research Site | Shenyang | 110001 | China |
| Research Site | Tianjin | 300457 | China |
| Research Site | Wenzhou | CN-325000 | China |
| Research Site | Wuhan | 430022 | China |
| Research Site | Xi'an | 710061 | China |
| 33176842 | Derived | Wang Y, Wang A, Li H, Li Z, Hu B, Li X, Zheng H, Fu L, Hu H, Nie Z, Qin Y, Zhao B, Wei D, Karlson BW, Bots ML, Chen Y, Wang Y. Measuring effects on intima-media thickness: an evaluation of rosuvastatin in Chinese subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis-design, rationale, and methodology of the METEOR-China study. Trials. 2020 Nov 11;21(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04741-0. |
| SAP\_redacted | View source |
|
| Received Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set consisted of all randomized patients.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Rosuvastatin 20 mg | Rosuvastatin 20 mg was administered in oral tablet form, once daily, for a 104-week (2-year) treatment period. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Placebo was administered in oral tablet form, once daily, for a 104-week (2-year) treatment period. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 10-year ICVD Risk | ICVD risk as collected by the Interactive Voice/Web Response System. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Annualized Rate of Change in Mean of the Maximum (MeanMax) CIMT Measurements From Each of the 12 Carotid Artery Sites Based on All Scans Performed During the 104-Week Study Period | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the common carotid artery (CCA), carotid bulb and internal carotid artery (ICA). The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. Twelve carotid artery sites were scanned at each visit and the 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for a specific segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements from each of the 12 sites, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm/year | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCA | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left CCA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm/year | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left Carotid Bulb | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left carotid bulb. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm/year | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left ICA | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left ICA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm/year | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Annualized Rate of Change in the Mean of the Mean (MeanMean) CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCA | CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left CCA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the mean of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMean CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm/year | From baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid, Lipoprotein and Apolipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) | The percent change from baseline at final visit for lipid and lipoprotein measurements (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], triglycerides, non-HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio) and apolipoprotein measurements (apolipoprotein A-I [ApoA-I], apolipoprotein B [ApoB] and ApoB/ApoA-I ratio) was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. In the evaluation of change from baseline (Week 0) to the final visit at Week 104, any missing observations were imputed by LOCF. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | From baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid and Lipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Time Weighted Average | The percent change from baseline at final visit for lipid and lipoprotein measurements (LDL-C, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglycerides, non-HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio) was determined by ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. In the evaluation of change from baseline (Week 0), the time-weighted average value was calculated as the value multiplied by the number of days since the last assessment, summed for all observations, and divided by the sum of days between all visits. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | From baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104). |
|
|
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events were collected from day of first dose in Week 0 up to and including 10 days following the date of last dose of investigational product or placebo (up to Week 104).
The safety analysis set consisted of all patients who took at least 1 dose of investigational product or placebo. Patients were analyzed according to treatment actually received.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Rosuvastatin 20 mg | Rosuvastatin 20 mg was administered in oral tablet form, once daily, for a 104-week (2-year) treatment period. | 0 | 272 | 38 | 272 | 144 | 272 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo was administered in oral tablet form, once daily, for a 104-week (2-year) treatment period. | 1 | 268 | 34 | 268 | 142 | 268 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriosclerosis coronary artery | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus node dysfunction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo positional | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Goitre | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperparathyroidism primary | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thyroid mass | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iridocyclitis | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pathologic myopia | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pterygium | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal detachment | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal vein occlusion | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestine polyp | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic cyst | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meniscus injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Patella fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Traumatic fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigation | Investigations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal column stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spondylolisthesis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer female | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mycosis fungoides | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salivary gland cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salivary gland neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thyroid cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral artery stenosis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral ischaemia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intercostal neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertonic bladder | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchiectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Henoch-Schonlein purpura | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arterial thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Protein urine present | Investigations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Clinical Lead | AstraZeneca | +1 302 885 1180 | ClinicalTrialTransparency@astrazeneca.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 6, 2019 | Nov 25, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068718 | Rosuvastatin Calcium |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013449 | Sulfonamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D005464 | Fluorobenzenes |
| D006845 | Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D013450 | Sulfones |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| ≥5% - <10% |
|
| Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|