Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The ROADSTER 2 Study is intended to evaluate real world usage of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent when used with the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System by physicians of varying experience with the transcarotid technique.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Procedural Success | Procedural success is defined as acute device success (successful insertion of the ENROUTE NPS and establishment of flow reversal), technical success (deployment of interventional tools) and the absence of a major adverse events (hierarchical stroke/death/myocardial infarction) through 30 days. | 30 Days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Event | Secondary endpoints include the 30-day rate of hierarchical stroke, death or myocardial infarction, the rate of hierarchical stroke, death or myocardial infarction by symptom status, the rate of cardiac death and the rate of neurological death. | 30 days |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patient must meet one of the following criteria regarding neurological symptom status and degree of stenosis:
Symptomatic: Stenosis must be >50% as determined by an angiogram and the patient has a history of stroke (minor or non-disabling; NIHSS ≤4 or mRS ≤2), TIA and/or amaurosis fugax within 180 days of the procedure procedure ipsilateral to the carotid artery to be stented.
OR Asymptomatic: Stenosis must be >80% as determined by angiogram without any neurological symptoms within the prior 180 days.
Target vessel must meet all requirements for ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System and ENROUTE Stent System (refer to IFU for requirements).
Patient has a discrete lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA).
Patient is ≥18 years of age.
Patient understands the nature of the procedure and has provided a signed informed consent using a form that has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site prior to the procedure. This will be obtained prior to participation in the study.
Patient is willing to comply with the protocol requirements and return to the treatment center for all required clinical evaluations.
Patient must have a life expectancy ≥ 3 years at the time of the index procedure without contingencies related to other medical, surgical or endovascular intervention.
Patient meets at least one of the surgical high-risk criteria listed below.
Anatomic High Risk Inclusion Criteria:
A. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion B. Tandem stenoses >70% C. High cervical carotid artery stenosis D. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy E. Bilateral carotid artery stenosis requiring treatment within 30 days after index treatment.
F. Hostile Necks which the Investigator deems safe for transcarotid access including but not limited to:
I. Prior neck irradiation II. Radical neck dissection III. Cervical spine immobility
Clinical High Risk Inclusion Criteria:
G. Patient is > 75 years of age H. Patient has > 2-vessel coronary artery disease and history of angina of any severity I. Patient has a history of angina
J. Patient has congestive heart failure (CHF) - New York Heart Association (NYHA)
K. Patient has known severe left ventricular dysfunction
L. Patient has had a myocardial infarction > 72 hours and < 6 weeks prior to procedure.
M. Patient has severe pulmonary disease (COPD) with either:
N. Patient has permanent contralateral cranial nerve injury O. Patient has chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL).
REMINDER: The following is a list of anatomical considerations that are not suitable for transfemoral CAS with distal protection that are NOT contraindications for enrollment in the ROADSTER 2 Study including but not limited to:
I. TypeII, III, or Bovine arch II. Arch atheroma or calcification III. Atheroma of the great vessel origins IV. Tortuous distal ICA V. Tortuous or occluded iliofemoral segments VI. Occluded aortoiliac segments
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Each potential patient must be screened to ensure that they do not meet any of the following exclusion criteria. This screening is to be based on known medical history and data available at the time of eligibility determination and enrollment.
Patient has an alternative source of cerebral embolus, including but not limited to:
Patient has a history of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months, or has had a recent (<7 days) stroke of sufficient size (on CT or MRI) to place him or her at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during the procedure.
Patient had hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days.
Patient with a history of major stroke attributable to either carotid artery (CVA or retinal embolus) with major neurological deficit (NIHSS ≥ 5 OR mRS ≥ 3) likely to confound study endpoints within 1 month of index procedure.
Patient has an intracranial tumor.
Patient has an evolving stroke.
Patient has neurologic illnesses within the past two years characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficit which cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke, including but not limited to: moderate to severe dementia, partial or secondarily generalized seizures, complicated or classic migraine, tumor or other space-occupying brain lesions, subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion or other post-traumatic lesions, intracranial infection, demyelinating disease, or intracranial hemorrhage).
Patient has had a TIA or amaurosis fugax within 48 hrs prior to the procedure.
Patient has an isolated hemisphere.
Patient had or will have CABG, endovascular stent procedure, valve intervention or vascular surgery within 30 days before or after the intervention.
Myocardial Infarction within 72 hours prior to the intervention.
Presence of a previous placed intravascular stent in target vessel or ipsilateral CCA or significant CCA inflow lesion.
Occlusion or [Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Trial (TIMI 0)] "string sign" >1cm of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
An intraluminal filling defect (defined as an endoluminal lucency surrounded by contrast, seen in multiple angiographic projections, in the absence of angiographic evidence of calcification) whether or not it is associated with an ulcerated target lesion.
Ostium of Common Carotid Artery (CCA) requires revascularization.
Patient has an open stoma in the neck.
Female patients who are pregnant or may become pregnant.
Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or stent materials (refer to stent IFU), including aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine, clopidogrel, statin or contrast media (that can't be pre medicated). Patients must be able to tolerate statins and a combination of ASA and ticlopidine or ASA and clopidogrel.
Patient must have a life expectancy <3 years without contingencies related to other medical, surgical, or interventional procedures as per the Wallaert Score and patients with primary, recurrent or metastatic malignancy who do not have independent assessment of life expectancy performed by the treating oncologist or an appropriate specialist other than the physician performing TCAR.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with atherosclerotic extracranial internal carotid stenosis (ICA) with or without involvement of the contiguous common artery (CCA) determined by duplex ultrasound, CT/CTA, MR/MRA or angiography to be:
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vikram Kashyap, MD | University Hospital Case Medical Center Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Peter Schneider, MD | Kaiser Permanente | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Morton UCLA Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States | ||
| MedStar Washington Hospital Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28335706 | Result | Alpaslan A, Wintermark M, Pinter L, Macdonald S, Ruedy R, Kolvenbach R. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal. J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17. | |
| 36563712 | Derived | Chung J, Kumins NH, Smith J, Motaganahalli RL, Schneider PA, Kwolek CJ, Kashyap VS; ROADSTER Investigators. Physiologic risk factors increase risk of myocardial infarction with transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal: The PROOF Study | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PP (Per Protocol) | Patients who underwent the study procedure, independent of the success of the procedure and in the absence of major protocol deviations. The analysis of the PP population excludes those subjects for whom a major protocol deviation was identified by the CEC |
| FG001 | ITT (Intention to Treat) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 10, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Number of Participants With Acute Device Success |
Acute device success is defined as the ability to insert the device, establish flow reversal, and remove the device |
| 2 hours (periprocedural) |
| Number of Participants With Technical Success | Technical success is defined as acute device success plus the ability to deliver interventional tools | 2 hours (periprocedural) |
| Number of Participants in Which a Cranial Nerve Injury Occurred | Rate of cranial nerve injury suspected to be caused by surgical procedure and adjudicated by CEC. | 90 days (extended follow-up) |
| Washington D.C. |
| District of Columbia |
| 20010 |
| United States |
| Emory Healthcare | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Kaiser Permanente, Hawaii | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96819 | United States |
| Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Unity Point Health - Iowa Clinic | Des Moines | Iowa | 50309 | United States |
| Baptist Health Louisville | Louisville | Kentucky | 40207 | United States |
| Eastern Maine Medical Center | Bangor | Maine | 04401 | United States |
| John Hopkins | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Beth Israel | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| St. Elizabeth's Medical Center | Brighton | Massachusetts | 02135 | United States |
| Michigan Vascular Center | Flint | Michigan | 48507 | United States |
| Abbott Northwestern | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55407 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Ct. | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| New Mexico | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87102 | United States |
| Albany Medical Center | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| Sisters of Charity Hospital | Buffalo | New York | 14214 | United States |
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| New Your Presbytarian - Weill Cornell | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| University of Rochester | Rochester | New York | 14623 | United States |
| Stony Brook Medicine | Stony Brook | New York | 11794 | United States |
| University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28203 | United States |
| University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Oklahoma Heart | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73120 | United States |
| St. Luke's University Health Network | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania | 18018 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Greenville Hospital System | Greenville | South Carolina | 29605 | United States |
| Wellmont CVA Heart Institute | Kingsport | Tennessee | 37660 | United States |
| Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons | Austin | Texas | 78756 | United States |
| Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Scott and White Memorial Hospital | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| Sentara Vascular Specialists | Chesapeake | Virginia | 23320 | United States |
| Virginia Mason Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98101 | United States |
| CAMC Clinical Trials Center | Charleston | West Virginia | 25304 | United States |
| University of Wisconsin | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| Technical University Munich | Munich | 81675 | Germany |
| Hospital Quirónsalud Marbella | Marbella | 29603 | Spain |
| 35381327 | Derived | Kashyap VS, So KL, Schneider PA, Rathore R, Pham T, Motaganahalli RL, Massop DW, Foteh MI, Eckstein HH, Jim J, Leal Lorenzo JI, Melton JG. One-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in the ROADSTER 2 trial. J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):466-473.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.872. Epub 2022 Apr 2. |
| 32811386 | Derived | Kashyap VS, Schneider PA, Foteh M, Motaganahalli R, Shah R, Eckstein HH, Henao S, LaMuraglia G, Stoner MC, Melton J, Massop D, Hanover T, Titus J, Moore WS, Rodriguez-Carvajal R, Malas MB, Arko FR 3rd, Pierce D, Anain P, Oskin T; ROADSTER 2 Investigators*. Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease. Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2620-2629. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030550. Epub 2020 Aug 19. |
All patients who were enrolled in the pivotal phase of the study but had major protocol deviations |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PP (Per Protocol) | Patients who underwent the study procedure, independent of the success of the procedure and in the absence of major protocol deviations. The analysis of the PP population excludes those subjects for whom a major protocol deviation was identified by the CEC |
| BG001 | ITT (Intention to Treat) | Patients who were enrolled in the pivotal phase of the study but had a major protocol deviation are included |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Symptomatic Status | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
| |||||||||||||||||
| High Surgical Risk Inclusion Criteria - Anatomic Risk Factors | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Medical History | Number | Percentage of participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Procedural Success | Procedural success is defined as acute device success (successful insertion of the ENROUTE NPS and establishment of flow reversal), technical success (deployment of interventional tools) and the absence of a major adverse events (hierarchical stroke/death/myocardial infarction) through 30 days. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 Days |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Event | Secondary endpoints include the 30-day rate of hierarchical stroke, death or myocardial infarction, the rate of hierarchical stroke, death or myocardial infarction by symptom status, the rate of cardiac death and the rate of neurological death. | 30 day Major Adverse Events as adjudicated by CEC | Posted | Number | Major Adverse Events | 30 days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Acute Device Success | Acute device success is defined as the ability to insert the device, establish flow reversal, and remove the device | 2 enrolled patients were withdrawn by the Investigator | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 2 hours (periprocedural) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Technical Success | Technical success is defined as acute device success plus the ability to deliver interventional tools | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 2 hours (periprocedural) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants in Which a Cranial Nerve Injury Occurred | Rate of cranial nerve injury suspected to be caused by surgical procedure and adjudicated by CEC. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90 days (extended follow-up) |
|
|
Adverse events were collected throughout the life of the study: 3 years, 6 months
Major adverse events, cranial nerve injuries, device related, and unanticipated adverse device effect event data were collected through 30 day follow-up period and recorded on the Adverse Event CRF. The Investigator or Coordinator determined whether an adverse event occurred
Major Adverse Events were defined in this study as stroke, death, or myocardial infarction as adjudicated by Clinical Events Committee.
Other Adverse Events (non-serious) were not collected or assessed for this study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PP (Per Protocol) | Patients who underwent the study procedure, independent of the success of the procedure and in the absence of major protocol deviations. The analysis of the PP population excludes those subjects for whom a major protocol deviation was identified by the CEC | 1 | 632 | 27 | 632 | 0 | 0 |
| EG001 | ITT (Intention to Treat) | All patients who were enrolled in the pivotal phase of the study in which a major protocol deviation was identified by the CEC. | 3 | 692 | 14 | 692 | 0 | 0 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cranial Nerve Injury | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Injury to cranial nerves in the vicinity of the treated carotid artery that has not resolved by one month after the initial procedure. |
| |
| Death - Neurological | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Death due to stroke or other neurologic cause |
| |
| Death - Other | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | Death that cannot be attributed to neurologic or cardiac causes |
| |
| Myocardial Infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | Myocardial ischemia with elevation of cardiac enzymes (CK-MB or troponin) to a value 2 or more times the individual clinical center's laboratory upper limit of normal |
| |
| NPS Device Related Event | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment | Includes dissection and any vascular complication that may be attributed to the procedure or devices |
| |
| Stroke - Contralateral | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | A neurological deficit attributed to an acute focal injury of the central nervous system contralateral to the vessel being stented. |
| |
| Stroke - Ipsilateral | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | A neurological deficit attributed to an acute focal injury of the central nervous system ipsilateral to the vessel being stented |
| |
| Possibly NPS/Stent device related event | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment | Includes dissection, and any vascular complication that may be attributed to the procedure or devices |
| |
| Stent Device Related Event | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment | Includes thrombus formation, and any vascular complication that may be attributed to the procedure or devices |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ric Ruedy, Executive VP, Clinical, Regulatory and Quality Affairs | Silk Road Medical, Inc. | 408-585-2112 | ric@silkroadmed.com |
| Jun 23, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002340 | Carotid Artery Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Caucasian |
|
| Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Pacific Islander |
|
| Unknown/Other |
|
| Mixed Race |
|
| Symptomatic |
|
| No |
|
| Tandem Stenoses >70% |
|
| High cervical carotid artery stenosis |
|
| Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy |
|
| Bilateral carotid artery stenosis req. treatment |
|
| Hostile necks safe for transcarotid access |
|
| Male |
|
| Diabetes |
|
| Hypertension |
|
| History of Peripheral Artery Disease |
|
| History of Coronary Artery Disease |
|
| History of Angina |
|
| Congestive Heart Failure |
|
| Recent MI |
|
| Severe Pulmonary Disease |
|
| Dyslipidemia |
|
| History of Stroke |
|
| History of TIA |
|
| History of Amaurosis Fugax |
|
| Current Nicotine Use |
|
| Age ≥75 Years |
|
| Age ≥80 Years |
|
| Contralateral Carotid Occlusion |
|
| High Cervical Carotid Stenosis |
|
| Restenosis after CEA |
|
| Bilateral Stenosis Requiring Treatment |
|
| Hostile Neck Safe for Transcarotid Access |
|
| >2 Vessel Coronary Disease |
|
|
|
|
|