Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Closed by IRB
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Wisconsin, Madison | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a research study to determine whether a cochlear implantation (CI) device can improve hearing in people who are deaf in one ear (known as single-sided deafness).
The goal of this study is to further investigate the role of CI in treating unilateral hearing loss and associated tinnitus. Single-sided deafness (SSD) afflicts approximately 60,000 new patients per year in the United States. The most common causes of these single-sided losses are sudden sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere's disease, trauma, and vestibular schwannoma. Patients with SSD face significant difficulty with communicating in the presence of background noise and in sound localization. Another significant problem for some SSD patients is tinnitus, which can be incapacitating and for which there are no therapies available that are considered to be of sufficient reliability to become a standard of care. Difficulty hearing in background noise and increased tinnitus can lead to significant frustration in social situations and contribute to increased isolation and a decreased quality of life. Treatment options for single sided deafness in the United States include contralateral routing of signals (CROS) hearing aids, bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) and use of assistive devices to improve the signal-to-noise in group situations. The first two devices take sound from the affected ear and transmit it to the unaffected ear. The last device consists of having a speaker wear a microphone and routing the signal directly to the patient's ear at a louder listening level. Although these devices can improve speech understanding in some patients, studies have shown that use of these devices does not ameliorate tinnitus or sound localization difficulties. Recent European studies have demonstrated that cochlear implantation (CI) can provide significant improvements in both perceived hearing ability and measured speech comprehension and localization in adult and pediatric patients with unilateral hearing loss. This suggests that CI may be a more effective option for this patient population than the CROS, BAHA or assistive devices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cochlear Implant surgery | Experimental | All subjects will be part of a single arm involving placement of the Med-El MAESTRO Cochlear Implant with Flex 28 electrode array |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Med-el MAESTRO Cochlear Implant with Flex 28 electrode array | Device | Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery followed by device activation, testing, and clinical assessment for 12 months following surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sound Detection Via Pure-tone Threshold Audiometry (PTA) | Sound field thresholds following cochlear implantation via pure-tone threshold audiometry. Measured in dB HL (decibels hearing level) where a lower number means more sensitive hearing and a higher number means less sensitive hearing. | 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively |
| Speech Perception Following Cochlear Implantation Assessed by Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word Recognition Testing | Ability to recognize words and sentences read by the tester from a set list at a loudness of 65 dB HL. The outcome is measured as a percent score of words recognized. The test takes place in a quiet environment. | Preop, 1-4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective Changes in Tinnitus Following Cochlear Implantation Measured by Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI) | Tinnitus severity rated by the Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI). The THI score of 0-16 means "no or slight handicap", 18 to 36 indicates "mild", 38 to 56 indicates "moderate", 58 to 76 indicates "severe", and a score of 78-100 is classified as "catastrophic handicap" | Preop and 12 months post-operatively |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years of age or older with the ability to provide informed consent
English as the primary language
Medically and psychologically suitable
Willing to receive/have received meningitis vaccinations
Able to pay for all care received through the study, either through the subject's insurance company or through self-pay
Able to comply with study requirements, including travel to the investigational sites
Severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (≥70 dB HL (decibel hearing level) thresholds between 500 and 4000 Hz) in the worse ear with ≤ 20% Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores
Duration of single-sided deafness ≥ one year
Tinnitus localized to the affected ear, both ears, or in the head localized to the affected ear, both ears, or in the head
Unilateral hearing loss secondary to viral or bacterial infection, such as meningitis or labyrinthitis
Ménière's disease
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Vascular disease affecting the inner ear
A combination of any number of the above conditions
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel J Lee, MD, FACS | MEEI / MGH | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21068690 | Background | Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):39-47. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271. | |
| 22931903 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cochlear Implant Surgery | All subjects will be part of a single arm involving placement of the Med-El MAESTRO Cochlear Implant with Flex 28 electrode array Med-el MAESTRO Cochlear Implant with Flex 28 electrode array: Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery followed by device activation, testing, and clinical assessment for 12 months following surgery. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cochlear Implant Surgery | All subjects will be part of a single arm involving placement of the Med-El MAESTRO Cochlear Implant with Flex 28 electrode array. Intervention consists of Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery followed by device activation, testing, and clinical assessment for 12 months following surgery. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sound Detection Via Pure-tone Threshold Audiometry (PTA) | Sound field thresholds following cochlear implantation via pure-tone threshold audiometry. Measured in dB HL (decibels hearing level) where a lower number means more sensitive hearing and a higher number means less sensitive hearing. | 11 participants had surgery, but one subject opted out of additional follow-up after the 6 month visit one subject did not return for his one year followup visit following activation. As such,12 month time points only have 9 participants' data analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | dB HL | 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively |
|
1 year following surgery
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cochlear Implant Surgery | Med-El MAESTRO Cochlear Implant with Flex 28 electrode array |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | hospitalization due to pneumonia |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dermatitis (eyelid) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Daniel Lee | Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary | 6175736981 | Daniel_Lee@meei.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 17, 2015 | Jan 28, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003054 | Cochlear Implants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058117 | Neural Prostheses |
| D058542 | Implantable Neurostimulators |
| D004567 | Electrodes, Implanted |
| D004566 | Electrodes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Arts RA, George EL, Stokroos RJ, Vermeire K. Review: cochlear implants as a treatment of tinnitus in single-sided deafness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;20(5):398-403. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283577b66. |
| 20014322 | Background | Bishop CE, Eby TL. The current status of audiologic rehabilitation for profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2010 Mar;120(3):552-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.20735. |
| 22935813 | Background | Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Waltzman SB, Arndt S. Auditory abilities after cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness: a pilot study. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Oct;33(8):1339-46. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d52d. |
| 22886035 | Background | Kamal SM, Robinson AD, Diaz RC. Cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness for enhancement of sound localization and speech perception. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;20(5):393-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328357a613. |
| 21756468 | Background | Punte AK, Vermeire K, Hofkens A, De Bodt M, De Ridder D, Van de Heyning P. Cochlear implantation as a durable tinnitus treatment in single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 May;12 Suppl 1:S26-9. doi: 10.1179/146701011X13001035752336. |
| 19266579 | Background | Linstrom CJ, Silverman CA, Yu GP. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness. Laryngoscope. 2009 Apr;119(4):713-20. doi: 10.1002/lary.20164. |
| 17086081 | Background | Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):714-31. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000246816.50820.42. |
| 19455039 | Background | Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J. Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):419-31. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a165be. |
| 23202156 | Background | Saroul N, Akkari M, Pavier Y, Gilain L, Mom T. Long-term benefit and sound localization in patients with single-sided deafness rehabilitated with an osseointegrated bone-conduction device. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):111-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827a2020. |
| 12544032 | Background | Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jan;24(1):73-8. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00015. |
| 16579492 | Background | Noble W, Gatehouse S. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2006 Mar;45(3):172-81. doi: 10.1080/14992020500376933. |
| 19816229 | Background | Popelka GR, Derebery J, Blevins NH, Murray M, Moore BC, Sweetow RW, Wu B, Katsis M. Preliminary evaluation of a novel bone-conduction device for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Apr;31(3):492-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181be6741. |
| 22136970 | Background | Ramos A, Polo R, Masgoret E, Artiles O, Lisner I, Zaballos ML, Moreno C, Osorio A. Cochlear implant in patients with sudden unilateral sensorineural hearing loss and associated tinnitus. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012 Jan-Feb;63(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Nov 30. English, Spanish. |
| 22314919 | Background | Snapp H, Angeli S, Telischi FF, Fabry D. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):291-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182429512. |
| 18834065 | Background | Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D. Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Sep;117(9):645-52. doi: 10.1177/000348940811700903. |
| 19005250 | Background | Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P. Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(3):163-71. doi: 10.1159/000171478. Epub 2008 Nov 13. |
| 41333071 | Derived | Thakkar T, Knoepker J, Dennison SR, Roche JP, Litovsky RY. Spatial separation enhances speech intelligibility but increases listening effort with session-dependent variability in pupillometric measures. Front Neurosci. 2025 Nov 10;19:1655826. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1655826. eCollection 2025. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sound detection via pure-tone air conduction threshold audiometry | Mean | Full Range | dB |
|
|
|
| Primary | Speech Perception Following Cochlear Implantation Assessed by Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word Recognition Testing | Ability to recognize words and sentences read by the tester from a set list at a loudness of 65 dB HL. The outcome is measured as a percent score of words recognized. The test takes place in a quiet environment. | 11 participants had surgery, but one subject opted out of additional follow-up after the 6 month visit one subject did not return for his one year followup visit following activation. As such,12 month time points only have 9 participants' data analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | percentage of words recognized | Preop, 1-4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subjective Changes in Tinnitus Following Cochlear Implantation Measured by Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI) | Tinnitus severity rated by the Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI). The THI score of 0-16 means "no or slight handicap", 18 to 36 indicates "mild", 38 to 56 indicates "moderate", 58 to 76 indicates "severe", and a score of 78-100 is classified as "catastrophic handicap" | 11 participants had surgery, pre and postoperative 12 month time points have 5 participants with available Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI) data 1/11 - did not have THI data available preoperatively | Posted | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale | Preop and 12 months post-operatively |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 2 |
| 11 |
| 9 |
| 11 |
|
| hip replacement | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | hospitalization due to hip replacement |
|
| postauricular irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| otitis media | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| incision tenderness/irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| nausea and vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| taste disturbance | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| eardrum perforation | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | from IT injections |
|
| bleeding at surgical site | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| magnet retention issues requiring stronger magnet | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| oral dryness | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| hyperacusis in non-implanted ear | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| general otalgia and otorrhea, intermittent | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D055615 |
| Electrical Equipment and Supplies |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D006310 | Hearing Aids |
| D012682 | Sensory Aids |
|
| 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
| 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
| 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|