Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-blinded, randomised, crossover investigation comparing the investigational device using intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine infusion to the standard intra-venous (IV) infusion method used for obtaining FFR measurements. All subjects requiring on a clinical basis a pressure wire assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis(es) will be eligible to take part in the investigation.
Coronary artery disease is the most common type of heart disease that affects millions of people worldwide. It is caused by a narrowing or blocking of the arteries (known as stenosis) due to plaque, which restricts blood flow and reduces the amount of oxygen to the heart.
Over the past decade, fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement has been increasingly used in cardiac catheterization laboratories, providing a straightforward and readily available quantitative assessment of the functional severity of a coronary artery stenosis, as the ability of the cardiologist to discriminate between stenoses that can cause ischemia and those that are physiologically insignificant on the basis of coronary angiography alone is limited.
Measuring FFR determines the ratio between the maximum achievable blood flow in a diseased or narrowed coronary artery and the maximum blood flow in a normal coronary artery. This ratio represents the potential decrease in coronary flow distal to the coronary stenosis.
FFR is easily measured during routine coronary angiography by using a pressure wire to calculate the ratio between the coronary pressure distal to a stenosis or a diseased segment and the aortic pressure under conditions of maximum myocardial hyperemia. An FFR of 1.0 is widely accepted as normal. An FFR lower than 0.80 is generally considered to be associated with coronary ischemia and widely accepted in favour of revascularization over conservative management.
The current standard methods of measuring FFR is to insert a pressure wire into the coronary artery while the hyperaemic agent, normally adenosine, is delivered by continuous intravenous infusion via a central femoral vein, a large ante-cubital peripheral cannula or intra-coronary bolus injection.
The investigational device in this clinical investigation is an FFR catheter being developed by Diasolve Limited; a UK based medical device development company. The FFR catheter is a combined pressure wire and hyperaemic agent delivery catheter, which allows simultaneous delivery of a pressure wire and administration of the hyperaemic agent directly into the coronary ostium or most proximal section of the coronary artery, when performing a FFR measurement using currently available pressure wire systems such as Pressure Wire Certus or Prestige from St Jude Medical.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IV followed by IC (investigation) | Experimental | The patient undergoes the FFR measurement with the standard measurement first followed by FFR measurement using the FFR Infusion Microcatheter |
|
| IC (investigation) followed by IV | Experimental | The patient undergoes the FFR measurement using the FFR Infusion Microcatheter measurement first followed by measurement via the standard measurement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFR Infusion Microcatheter and standard intra-venous (IV) infusion | Device | Cross-over design where FFR is measured twice in the same lesion using standard standard intra-venous (IV) infusion and new method |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with comparable FFR ratio recordings | The FFR ratio should remain constant when measured by the standard method and the investigational device. | Intraoperative |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with Adverse Events | Participants should not experience any additional adverse events during FFR ratio measurement using the investigational device than they do using the standard method. | Intraoperative |
| Dose of adenosine administered. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Prior to randomisation:
1. Coronary angiogram demonstrates at least one coronary stenosis of intermediate severity (40-70%), in a non-infarct related artery, which requires FFR measurement for physiological assessment.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Elghamaz, MB BCh, MRCP | London North West Healthcare NHS Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Paul Wenberger | Diasolve Ltd | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwick Park Hospital | Harrow | Middx | HA1 3UJ | United Kingdom |
individual data will not be shared
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Maximum hyperaemia may be achieved with a reduced dose of adenosine using the FFR Catheter. |
| Intraoperative |
| Time to onset of maximum hyperaemia. | Maximum hyperaemia may be achieved faster using the FFR Catheter | Intraoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided