Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation | OTHER |
| Jaeb Center for Health Research | OTHER |
| Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main study objective is to determine whether day and night automated closed loop glucose control combined with pump suspend feature will improve glucose control and reduce the burden of hypoglycaemia compared to sensor augmented insulin pump therapy alone.
This is an open-label, multi-centre, multi-national, single-period, randomised, parallel group design study, involving a three-month period of home study during which day and night glucose levels will be controlled either by a closed loop system combined with pump suspend feature (intervention group) or by sensor augmented insulin pump therapy (control group).
It is expected that up to 100 subjects, aiming for 84 randomised subjects [42 youth (6 to 21 years), and 42 adults (22 years and older)], with type 1 diabetes will be recruited through paediatric and adult outpatient diabetes clinics in each of the investigation centres. Subjects who drop out within the first four weeks of the intervention may be replaced. Participants will all be on subcutaneous insulin pump therapy and will have proven competencies both in the use of the study insulin pump and the study CGM device.
Subjects in the intervention group will receive appropriate training in the safe use of closed loop insulin delivery system and pump suspend feature. All subjects will have regular contact with the study team during the home study phase including 24/7 telephone support. The primary outcome is between group differences in the time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l (70 to 180mg/dl) based on CGM glucose levels during the 12 week free living phase. Secondary outcomes are HbA1 at the end of treatment period, the time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics. Safety evaluation comprises assessment of the frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes.
Purpose of the study:
To determine whether day and night automated closed loop glucose control combined with pump suspend feature will improve glucose control as measured by glycated haemoglobin and reduce the burden of hypoglycaemia compared to sensor augmented insulin pump therapy.
Study objectives:
Study design:
An open-label, multi-centre, multi-national, randomised, single-period, parallel group study, contrasting day and night automated closed loop glucose control combined with pump suspend feature with sensor augmented insulin pump therapy
Population:
84 participants randomised (42 youth and 42 adults). Each centre will aim to recruit between 05 and 20 participants.
Maximum duration of study for a subject :
18 weeks
Recruitment:
The subjects will be recruited through the paediatric and adult diabetes outpatient clinics at each centre.
Consent:
Written consent/assent will be obtained from participants and/or guardians according to REC/IRB requirements.
Screening assessment:
Eligible participants will undergo a screening evaluation where blood samples for full blood count, renal, liver, thyroid function and anti-transglutaminase antibodies with IgA levels will be taken (if not done in the previous 3 months). Random C-peptide, glucose and HbA1c will also be measured, and a urine pregnancy test in females of child-bearing potential.
Questionnaires investigating participants' quality of life, psychosocial functioning and response to their current treatment will be distributed. Cognitive assessment will be made using validated computerized cognitive tests.
Study Training:
Training sessions on the use of study CGM, insulin pump (and closed loop system for those randomised to the intervention group) will be provided by the research team. Training session on the use of real-time CGM and on how to interpret real-time and retrospective stored data will be provided to all subjects/carers using written material.
Run-in Period:
During a 4 week run-in period, subjects will use study CGM and insulin pump. The research team will contact subject once weekly during the run-in period, and subjects will also be able to contact the research team for support and treatment optimisation as necessary. For compliance and to assess the ability of the subject to use the CGM and study pump safely, at least 12 days of CGM data need to be recorded and safe use of study insulin pump demonstrated during the last 14 days of run-in period.
Competency assessment:
Competency on the use of study insulin pump and study CGM will be evaluated using a competency assessment tool developed by the research team. Further training may be delivered as required.
Randomisation:
Eligible subjects will be randomised using randomisation software to the use of real-time CGM and pump suspend feature combined with day and night closed loop or to sensor augmented insulin pump therapy.
Automated day and night closed loop insulin delivery (intervention arm) combined with pump suspend feature (interventional arm):
At the start, a blood sample will be taken for the measurement of HbA1c and a urine pregnancy test in females of child-bearing potential.
A subset of participants will be interviewed to enable their historical diabetes management practices, everyday work and family lives, and their initial expectations of using closed loop technology to be captured and explored in-depth.
Subjects will be admitted to the clinical facility on Day 1. Training on the use of closed loop and pump suspend feature will be provided by the research team. During the next 2-4 hours patient will operate the system under the supervision of the clinical team. Competency on the use of closed loop system will be evaluated. Subjects will use closed loop and pump suspend feature for 12 weeks.
Sensor augmented insulin pump therapy (control arm):
A blood sample will be taken for the measurement of HbA1c and a urine pregnancy test in females of child-bearing potential. Subjects will use sensor augmented insulin pump therapy without pump suspend feature for 12 weeks.
End of study assessments:
Procedures for safety monitoring during trial:
Criteria for withdrawal of patients on safety grounds:
A subject, parent, or guardian may terminate participation in the study at any time without necessarily giving a reason and without any personal disadvantage. An investigator can stop the participation of a subject after consideration of the benefit/risk ratio. Possible reasons are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24/7 closed loop insulin delivery | Experimental | Unsupervised home use of day and night automated closed loop insulin delivery system (FlorenceM) combined with pump suspend feature over a 12-week period using 24/7 Medtronic insulin pump 640G and Android smartphone. |
|
| Sensor augmented pump therapy | Active Comparator | Insulin pump therapy combined with unmasked real-time continuous glucose monitoring system for 12 weeks using Medtronic insulin pump 640G. Pump suspend features will be turned off. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlorenceM | Device | The automated closed loop system (FlorenceM) will consist of:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l (70 to 180mg/dl) based on CGM glucose levels | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| HbA1c at the end of treatment period | Between group differences in HbA1c levels at the end of treatment period adjusted for pre-study period HbA1c level. | HbA1c will be taken at the end of 12-week study intervention. |
| Time spent below target glucose (3.9mmol/l)(70mg/dl) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia per subject and incidence rate per 100-person years | Comparison of safety outcomes between the two treatment groups only include those events occurring on or after randomization until the last visit date or the last event date (whichever is later). | 12 week intervention phase |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roman Hovorka, PhD | Department of Paedatrics, University of Cambridge, UK | Study Director |
| David B Dunger, Prof | Department of Paedatrics, University of Cambridge, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Fiona Campbell, MD | St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Amy Criego, Prof | International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, USA | Principal Investigator |
| Mark Evans, MD | Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Lalantha Leelarathna, PhD | Manchester Diabetes Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Richard Bergenstal, Prof | International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, USA | Principal Investigator |
| Viral Shah, MD | Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, USA | Principal Investigator |
| Daniela Elleri, MD |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Colorado Denver | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States | ||
| International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25819473 | Background | Hovorka R. Artificial Pancreas Project at Cambridge 2013. Diabet Med. 2015 Aug;32(8):987-92. doi: 10.1111/dme.12766. Epub 2015 Apr 15. | |
| 24963110 | Background | Leelarathna L, Dellweg S, Mader JK, Allen JM, Benesch C, Doll W, Ellmerer M, Hartnell S, Heinemann L, Kojzar H, Michalewski L, Nodale M, Thabit H, Wilinska ME, Pieber TR, Arnolds S, Evans ML, Hovorka R; AP@home Consortium. Day and night home closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes: three-center randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jul;37(7):1931-7. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2911. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| University College London Hospitals |
| OTHER |
| The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | OTHER |
| Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER_GOV |
| International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet | OTHER |
| University of Colorado, Denver | OTHER |
| University of Edinburgh | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Medtronic insulin pump 640G | Device | Next generation sensor-augmented Medtronic insulin pump 640G (Medtronic Minimed, CA, USA) incorporating the Medtronic Enlite 3 family real time CGM. Glucose suspend features will be turned off. |
|
both arms |
| 12 week intervention phase |
| Time spent above target glucose (10.0 mmol/l) (180 mg/dl) | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Average of glucose levels | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| The time with glucose levels < 3.5 mmol/l (63mg/dl) and <2.8 mmol/l (50mg/dl) | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| The time with glucose levels in the significant hyperglycaemia (glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l) (300mg/dl) | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Total, basal and bolus insulin dose | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| AUC of glucose below 3.5mmol/l (63mg/dl) | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Standard deviation of glucose levels | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Coefficient of variation of glucose levels | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Number of pump suspend events | closed-loop arm only | 12 week intervention phase |
| Change of body weight from screening to end of study | both arms | 12 week intervention phase |
| Number of subjects with severe hypoglycemia events |
Comparison of safety outcomes between the two treatment groups only include those events occurring on or after randomization until the last visit date or the last event date (whichever is later). |
| 12 week intervention phase |
| Number of subjects with severe hyperglycemia events as defined by fingerprick glucose >16.7 mmol/l (>300 mg/dl) and plasma ketones >0.6 mmol/l | Comparison of safety outcomes between the two treatment groups only include those events occurring on or after randomization until the last visit date or the last event date (whichever is later). | 12 week intervention phase |
| Number of subjects with DKA events | Comparison of safety outcomes between the two treatment groups only include those events occurring on or after randomization until the last visit date or the last event date (whichever is later). | 12 week intervention phase |
| Number of any other serious adverse event reported | Comparison of safety outcomes between the two treatment groups only include those events occurring on or after randomization until the last visit date or the last event date (whichever is later). | 12 week intervention phase |
| Amount of CL system use | Utility evaluation. The amount of system use in the CL arm will be calculated over the period starting from the day after treatment initiation until the earlier of the 12 week visit date or Day 84 from randomization (whichever comes first). | 12 week intervention phase |
| Amount of CGM use | Utility evaluation. The amount of CGM use in both arm will be calculated over the period starting from the day after treatment initiation until the earlier of the 12 week visit date or Day 84 from randomization (whichever comes first). | 12 week intervention phase |
| Endocrine/Diabetes Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK |
| Principal Investigator |
| Minneapolis |
| Minnesota |
| 55416 |
| United States |
| International Diabetes Centre at Park Nicollet | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55416 | United States |
| University of Cambridge | Cambridge | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science | Cambridge | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| Royal Hospital for Sick Children | Edinburgh | EH9 1LF | United Kingdom |
| Leeds Teaching Hospitals | Leeds | LS9 7TF | United Kingdom |
| Manchester Diabetes Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary | Manchester | United Kingdom |
| 24943065 | Background | Thabit H, Lubina-Solomon A, Stadler M, Leelarathna L, Walkinshaw E, Pernet A, Allen JM, Iqbal A, Choudhary P, Kumareswaran K, Nodale M, Nisbet C, Wilinska ME, Barnard KD, Dunger DB, Heller SR, Amiel SA, Evans ML, Hovorka R. Home use of closed-loop insulin delivery for overnight glucose control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a 4-week, multicentre, randomised crossover study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Sep;2(9):701-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70114-7. Epub 2014 Jun 16. |
| 24757227 | Background | Hovorka R, Elleri D, Thabit H, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, El-Khairi R, Kumareswaran K, Caldwell K, Calhoun P, Kollman C, Murphy HR, Acerini CL, Wilinska ME, Nodale M, Dunger DB. Overnight closed-loop insulin delivery in young people with type 1 diabetes: a free-living, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1204-11. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2644. |
| 31133076 | Derived | Lawton J, Blackburn M, Breckenridge JP, Hallowell N, Farrington C, Rankin D. Ambassadors of hope, research pioneers and agents of change-individuals' expectations and experiences of taking part in a randomised trial of an innovative health technology: longitudinal qualitative study. Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3373-9. |
| 30292578 | Derived | Tauschmann M, Thabit H, Bally L, Allen JM, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Ruan Y, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Cheng P, Beck RW, Acerini CL, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Elleri D, Campbell F, Bergenstal RM, Criego A, Shah VN, Leelarathna L, Hovorka R; APCam11 Consortium. Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1321-1329. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31947-0. Epub 2018 Oct 3. |
| 28710224 | Derived | Bally L, Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Exall J, Huegel V, Sibayan J, Borgman S, Cheng P, Blackburn M, Lawton J, Elleri D, Leelarathna L, Acerini CL, Campbell F, Shah VN, Criego A, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Kollman C, Bergenstal RM, Hovorka R. Assessing the effectiveness of a 3-month day-and-night home closed-loop control combined with pump suspend feature compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in youths and adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomised parallel study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e016738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016738. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided