Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason-enhanced dobutamine stress echo (CE-DSE) in subjects having a suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) at rest and who were scheduled for coronary angiography.
The study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason at improving the visualization of the LV EBD during pharmacologic stress echocardiography examinations and for detection or exclusion of the coronary artery disease (CAD). The study population consisted of adult subjects referred for pharmacological stress echocardiography and with suboptimal image quality during unenhanced ultrasound imaging at rest who had known or suspected CAD. Subjects enrolled in the study represented subjects who could benefit most from contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) stress echocardiography.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lumason | Experimental | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumason | Drug | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) | The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography is performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis is negative). Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented. Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively. | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed |
| Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images | The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Total LV EBD | Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome. | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
In addition, due to the use of Atropine in subjects who had not reached targeted heart rate with peak dobutamine infusion, subjects with the following were excluded:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melda Dolan, MD | Bracco Diagnostics, Inc | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona | Tucson | Arizona | 85724 | United States | ||
| University of California San Diego |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Lumason | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection Lumason: Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 30, 2015 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography | up to 72 hours post dose |
| La Jolla |
| California |
| 92037 |
| United States |
| Interventional Cardiology Medical Group, Inc. | West Hills | California | 91037 | United States |
| Cardiology Physicians, PA | Newark | Delaware | 19713 | United States |
| Community Heart and Vascular Community Hospital East | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46250 | United States |
| St. Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| North Kansas City Hospital | North Kansas City | Missouri | 64116 | United States |
| Morristown Medical Center | Morristown | New Jersey | 07960 | United States |
| The Institute for Clinical Research Holy Name Medical Center | Teaneck | New Jersey | 07666 | United States |
| Mount Sinai Medical Center | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta Hospital | Edmonton | Alberta | T6G2B7 | Canada |
| Medizinische Klinik m.S. Kardiologie und Angiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Berlin | 10117 | Germany |
| Klinikum Lünen, St. Marien-Hospital GmbH | Lünen | 44534 | Germany |
| Universitätsmedizin Mainz | Mainz | 55131 | Germany |
| Kardiologie Klinik Dr. Müller GmbH, Peter Osypka Heart Center | Munich | 81379 | Germany |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Parma | Parma | 43126 | Italy |
| Azienda Policlinico Umberto I Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza | Rome | 00161 | Italy |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Lumason | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection Lumason: Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sensitivity and Specificity for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) | The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography is performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis is negative). Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented. Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively. | Analysis population for coronary artery disease (CAD) included all subjects who received Lumason, had overall diagnostic conclusion of CAD available at peak stress for both UE-DSE and CE-DSE and had a definite truth standard diagnosis (Positive, Negative) for CAD (coronary angiography or 6 months collection of cardiac events follow-up data). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images | The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo | The analysis population for EBD included all subjects who received Lumason and had EBD data available at peak stress for both UE-DSE and CE-DSE. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Total LV EBD | Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome. | The analysis population for EBD included all subjects who received Lumason and had EBD data available at peak stress for both UE-DSE and CE-DSE. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography | Safety analysis population includes all subjects who received Lumason | Posted | Number | participants | up to 72 hours post dose |
|
|
All adverse events (AE) that occurred from the time the subject signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF) until 72 hours after the last administration of Lumason or until the subject underwent cardiac intervention, whichever came first, were listed [recorded], [with predose AEs flagged in the subject data listings.]
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Lumason | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection Lumason: Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography | 0 | 173 | 3 | 173 | 21 | 173 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phlebitis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bifascicular block | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ventricular extrasystoles | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mouth ulceration | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Electrocardiogram change | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematocrit increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Troponin increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melda S. Dolan, MD, FACC, FASE, Head, Medical Affairs and Cardiac Ultrasound | Bracco Diagnostics Inc. | 1-609-514-2506 | Melda.Dolan@diag.bracco.com |
| Jul 21, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C420843 | contrast agent BR1 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority |
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects with adverse events (AE) |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with AEs by intensity - Mild |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with AEs by intensity -Moderate |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with AEs by intensity - Severe |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with serious AEs |
|