Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01MH109637 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the changes that happen in the brain and the body when a person is depressed. This study will determine if the level of inflammation in the body is related to symptoms of depression, how well the person thinks, and how certain brain regions communicate.
Cytokines released by an activated immune system have been associated with decreased brain dopamine and the development of depression. Biomarkers of inflammation, such as inflammatory cytokines and acute-phase proteins like C-reactive protein (CRP), are elevated in a significant proportion of patients with mood and psychiatric disorders. The investigators will study if administration of Levodopa (L- 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine [DOPA]-carbidopa, 250/25mg) to depressed patients with high inflammation will 1) increase corticostriatal functional connectivity, and 2) improve objective measures of motivation compared to placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sinemet/Placebo | Active Comparator | Subjects with major depression will be given Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at one study visit and placebo at the other study visit. Sinemet will be given first followed by placebo at the subsequent visit. |
|
| Placebo/Sinemet | Active Comparator | Subjects with major depression will be given placebo at one study visit and Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at the other study visit. Placebo will be given first followed by Sinemet at the subsequent visit. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levodopa+carbidopa | Drug | Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet will be administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Functional Corticostriatal Connectivity | Corticostriatal connectivity was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Resting-state and task-based (monetary incentive delay [MID]) fMRI scans were conducted on a 3 Tesla Siemens Trio MRI scanner. Subject-level correlations for degree of cortical and striatal functional connectivity were Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln[(1+R)/(1-R)]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity. Greater Fisher's Z-scores reflected stronger correlated fMRI activity (i.e., higher corticostriatal connectivity). | Scans approximately 45 min post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune Markers | Peripheral blood samples were analyzed for levels of immune markers like plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -alpha, soluble cytokine receptor2 (TNFR 2), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). | Scans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive Test | The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a computer-based multi-trial task used to objectively assess motivation. Possible results range between 0 to1 with 1 being a better outcome. Results show mean probability of hard (high effort) choice. | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Change in Functional Connectivity | The cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after Sinemet (250 mg levodopa/ 50mg carbidopa) or placebo administration was assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) fMRI. | Scans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Felger, PhD | Emory University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35927580 | Result | Bekhbat M, Li Z, Mehta ND, Treadway MT, Lucido MJ, Woolwine BJ, Haroon E, Miller AH, Felger JC. Functional connectivity in reward circuitry and symptoms of anhedonia as therapeutic targets in depression with high inflammation: evidence from a dopamine challenge study. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;27(10):4113-4121. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01715-3. Epub 2022 Aug 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were enrolled between October 2015 and February 2020.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sinemet/Placebo | Subjects with major depression were given Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at one study visit and placebo at the other study visit. Sinemet was given first followed by placebo at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
| FG001 | Placebo/Sinemet | Subjects with major depression were given placebo at one study visit and Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at the other study visit. Placebo was given first followed by Sinemet at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sinemet/Placebo | Subjects with major depression were given Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at one study visit and placebo at the other study visit. Sinemet was given first followed by placebo at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Functional Corticostriatal Connectivity | Corticostriatal connectivity was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Resting-state and task-based (monetary incentive delay [MID]) fMRI scans were conducted on a 3 Tesla Siemens Trio MRI scanner. Subject-level correlations for degree of cortical and striatal functional connectivity were Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln[(1+R)/(1-R)]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity. Greater Fisher's Z-scores reflected stronger correlated fMRI activity (i.e., higher corticostriatal connectivity). | The number analyzed in one or more rows correspond to the number with available and analyzable resting fMRI scans both pre and post drug and placebo. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Z-score | Scans approximately 45 min post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
From time of consent until follow up (up to 2 weeks).
The population analyzed includes all subjects who were randomized and had taken at least one dose of the medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sinemet | Levodopa+carbidopa (Sinemet) is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally either at Visit 1 if the subject was in the Sinemet/Placebo group or, at Visit 2 if the subject was in the Placebo/Sinemet group. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Jennifer Felger | Emory University | 404-727-3987 | jfelger@emory.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 6, 2020 | Feb 11, 2022 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jan 6, 2020 | Sep 20, 2021 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| D059445 | Anhedonia |
| D011596 | Psychomotor Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C009265 | carbidopa, levodopa drug combination |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and will be administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
|
| The Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive Assessment | The Trail Making Test (TMT) is used to measure basic attention and psychomotor processing speed. Time taken to complete each task is recorded in seconds, whereby the greater the number of seconds, the slower the psychomotor speed. | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Digit Symbol Task Neurocognitive Test | The Digit Symbol Task was used to assess graphomotor speed, visual scanning and memory processing speed involving numbers and a corresponding blank box where subjects are asked to fill in matching symbol as fast as they can. Results show the average number of correct symbols completed in up to 100 boxes in 90 seconds. | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Finger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive Test | The Finger Tapping Task (FTT) assesses motor speed and can detect subtle motor impairment. The test measures the average number of taps per 10 second trial. A greater number of taps reflects faster motor speed. | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Reaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive Test | The reaction time test includes simple and choice reaction time tasks and is divided into 5 stages requiring increasingly complex chains of responses. The task provided distinction between reaction (or decision) time and movement latencies (milliseconds) based on touch responses made to a single (simple) or chosen from multiple (choice) stimuli flashed on a computer screen. Results show mean response latency in milliseconds. | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report Questionnaire | The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure severity of fatigue based on five dimensions of fatigue, general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The total MFI scores range from 20 to 100 where high scores indicate greater fatigue. | At baseline and Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report Questionnaire | The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), a 14-item self-report scale with high psychometric validity for assessing the presence of anhedonia, was used to assess hedonic capacity. Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with the 14 items phrased as "I would enjoy __" based on their ability to experience pleasure. Of the four possible response categories (Definitely Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree), either of the Disagree responses received a score of 1 and either of the Agree responses received a score of 0. The SHAPS score calculated as the sum of these 14 items ranged from 0 to 14, and higher SHAPS scores indicated greater anhedonia. | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
| Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) Questionnaire | The Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) is a 30-item self-report instrument with excellent psychometric properties for measuring symptom constructs consistent with current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nosology and that is widely used to measure depression severity in clinical trials. Response scores are summed and range from 0 to 84, with higher scores reflecting greater depression severity. | At baseline and Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale Score | The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a widely used self-report for measuring depression severity over the past two weeks and the anhedonia subscale is one of several validated subscales in the BDI-II. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = the symptom of depression has not been experienced and 3 = the symptom of depression is severe. The anhedonia subscale score is created by summing responses to four items of the BDI-II that assess loss of pleasure, loss of interest, loss of energy, loss of sex drive. The total score of the anhedonia subscale ranges from 0 to 12 where higher scores reflect greater severity of anhedonia symptoms. | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
| Profile of Mood States (POMS) Scale | The Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale is a 30-item psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states. Participants rate the extent to which they feel unhappy, blue, lonely, gloomy, and worthless on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores range from 0 to 120 with higher scores reflecting a more negative mood state. | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
| State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Scale | The 20-item self-report State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State scale was used to measure severity of anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety. Scores in the high 40s are considered clinically significant. | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
| Change in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale Score | The motivation and pleasure (MAP) questionnaire is an 18-item self-report inventory that was created to disentangle state-wise motivational and consummatory components of everyday activities over a 24-hour period. This scale was used to assess self-reported changes in symptoms of anhedonia before and after inflammation blockade. Respondents respond to statements about daily activities on a scale from 0 (no pleasure/not at all) to 4 (extreme pleasure/very often). Total scores range from 0 to 72 where higher scores indicate greater motivation and effort given to everyday situations. | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
| BG001 | Placebo/Sinemet | Subjects with major depression were given placebo at one study visit and Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at the other study visit. Placebo was given first followed by Sinemet at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
Subjects with major depression were given Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at one study visit and placebo at the other study visit. Sinemet was given first followed by placebo at the subsequent visit.
Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2.
Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2.
| OG001 | Placebo/Sinemet | Subjects with major depression will be given placebo at one study visit and Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at the other study visit. Placebo will be given first followed by Sinemet at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet will be administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and will be administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. |
|
|
| Primary | Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune Markers | Peripheral blood samples were analyzed for levels of immune markers like plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -alpha, soluble cytokine receptor2 (TNFR 2), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). | The number analyzed in each row correspond to the number available and analyzable with resting fMRI scans both pre and post drug and placebo. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient | Scans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive Test | The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a computer-based multi-trial task used to objectively assess motivation. Possible results range between 0 to1 with 1 being a better outcome. Results show mean probability of hard (high effort) choice. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. Two participants in each study arm did not complete this assessment at any time point. Two participants in the Placebo/Sinemet group had unusable data for the baseline assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Probability of hard/high effort choices | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive Assessment | The Trail Making Test (TMT) is used to measure basic attention and psychomotor processing speed. Time taken to complete each task is recorded in seconds, whereby the greater the number of seconds, the slower the psychomotor speed. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. One participant in the Sinemet/Placebo arm and two participants in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point. Three participants in the Placebo/Sinemet group had unusable data for the baseline assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Digit Symbol Task Neurocognitive Test | The Digit Symbol Task was used to assess graphomotor speed, visual scanning and memory processing speed involving numbers and a corresponding blank box where subjects are asked to fill in matching symbol as fast as they can. Results show the average number of correct symbols completed in up to 100 boxes in 90 seconds. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. One participant in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point and one had unusable data for the baseline assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | number of correct symbols | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Finger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive Test | The Finger Tapping Task (FTT) assesses motor speed and can detect subtle motor impairment. The test measures the average number of taps per 10 second trial. A greater number of taps reflects faster motor speed. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. One participant in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point and one had unusable data for the baseline assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | number of taps | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Reaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive Test | The reaction time test includes simple and choice reaction time tasks and is divided into 5 stages requiring increasingly complex chains of responses. The task provided distinction between reaction (or decision) time and movement latencies (milliseconds) based on touch responses made to a single (simple) or chosen from multiple (choice) stimuli flashed on a computer screen. Results show mean response latency in milliseconds. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. Seven participants in the Sinemet/Placebo arm and 8 participants in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point. One participant in each study arm had unusable data for the baseline assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliseconds | At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report Questionnaire | The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure severity of fatigue based on five dimensions of fatigue, general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The total MFI scores range from 20 to 100 where high scores indicate greater fatigue. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline and Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report Questionnaire | The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), a 14-item self-report scale with high psychometric validity for assessing the presence of anhedonia, was used to assess hedonic capacity. Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with the 14 items phrased as "I would enjoy __" based on their ability to experience pleasure. Of the four possible response categories (Definitely Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree), either of the Disagree responses received a score of 1 and either of the Agree responses received a score of 0. The SHAPS score calculated as the sum of these 14 items ranged from 0 to 14, and higher SHAPS scores indicated greater anhedonia. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) Questionnaire | The Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) is a 30-item self-report instrument with excellent psychometric properties for measuring symptom constructs consistent with current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nosology and that is widely used to measure depression severity in clinical trials. Response scores are summed and range from 0 to 84, with higher scores reflecting greater depression severity. | Three participants in the Sinemet/Placebo arm and four participants in the Placebo/Sinemet arm had unusable data for the baseline assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline and Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale Score | The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a widely used self-report for measuring depression severity over the past two weeks and the anhedonia subscale is one of several validated subscales in the BDI-II. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = the symptom of depression has not been experienced and 3 = the symptom of depression is severe. The anhedonia subscale score is created by summing responses to four items of the BDI-II that assess loss of pleasure, loss of interest, loss of energy, loss of sex drive. The total score of the anhedonia subscale ranges from 0 to 12 where higher scores reflect greater severity of anhedonia symptoms. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Profile of Mood States (POMS) Scale | The Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale is a 30-item psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states. Participants rate the extent to which they feel unhappy, blue, lonely, gloomy, and worthless on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores range from 0 to 120 with higher scores reflecting a more negative mood state. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
|
| Secondary | State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Scale | The 20-item self-report State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State scale was used to measure severity of anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety. Scores in the high 40s are considered clinically significant. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale Score | The motivation and pleasure (MAP) questionnaire is an 18-item self-report inventory that was created to disentangle state-wise motivational and consummatory components of everyday activities over a 24-hour period. This scale was used to assess self-reported changes in symptoms of anhedonia before and after inflammation blockade. Respondents respond to statements about daily activities on a scale from 0 (no pleasure/not at all) to 4 (extreme pleasure/very often). Total scores range from 0 to 72 where higher scores indicate greater motivation and effort given to everyday situations. | This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Change in Functional Connectivity | The cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after Sinemet (250 mg levodopa/ 50mg carbidopa) or placebo administration was assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) fMRI. | Not Posted | Scans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week) | Participants |
| 0 |
| 57 |
| 0 |
| 57 |
| 50 |
| 57 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally either at Visit 1 if the subject was in the Placebo/Sinemet group or, at Visit 2 if the subject was in the Sinemet/Placebo group. | 0 | 56 | 0 | 56 | 11 | 56 |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lightheadedness | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Feeling Hot | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| CRP mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre) |
|
|
| CRP mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP mg/L and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP mg/L and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP > vs. < 2 mg/ and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre) |
|
|
| CRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre) |
|
|
| CRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| CRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Sum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre) |
|
|
| Sum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre) |
|
|
| Sum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Sum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Sum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Sum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
|
| Baseline Choice Motor Time |
|
|
| Baseline Simple Reaction Time |
|
|
| Baseline Choice Reaction Time |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Motor Time |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Motor Time |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Reaction Time |
|
|
| Visit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Reaction Time |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Motor Time |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Motor Time |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Reaction Time |
|
|
| Visit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Reaction Time |
|
|
| Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo |
|
|
| Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo |
|
| Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo |
|