Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to find out if SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain in the spine 3 months after receiving treatment.
This research is being done because while there is some evidence suggesting that SBRT may improve treatment for patients with spine metastases, more research is needed to determine if it is better than CRT. The first part of the randomized trial (phase II) looked at whether it was possible (feasible) to provide these treatments in cancer centres across Canada, by aiming to recruit 54 participants within 18 months. This part of the study was successfully completed in early 2017. The second component of this study, called a randomized phase III trial, is now underway. It involves recruiting another 124 participants to receive either CRT or SBRT, using the same study procedure as in the feasibility study. We will continue to obtain information about whether SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Conventional Radiotherapy | Active Comparator | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions |
|
| Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy | Experimental | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Gy in 5 fractions | Radiation |
| ||
| Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phase III: Complete Pain Response at 3 Months Post-radiation | A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) . | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Pain Response at 6 Months Post Radiation Based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party Criteria | A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) . | 6 months post radiation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of cancer (excluding seminoma, small cell lung cancer and hematologic primaries).
Spinal metastasis documented with MRI and suitable for treatment with radiotherapy with the following characteristics:
There is no plan to change the pain medication on the first day of protocol treatment with radiotherapy.
ECOG Performance Status 0-2.
Seen by a radiation oncologist and judged to be appropriate for participation in this study including ability to tolerate protocol radiotherapy (SBRT or CRT).
Age of 18 years or older.
Patient is able and willing to complete the Patient Diary (pain and analgesic use).
Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaire in either English or French. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines, prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible.
Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrollment in the trial to document their willingness to participate.
Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.
In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 3 weeks of patient randomization. From the time of successful treatment planning, no more than 12 days can elapse before the first fraction of radiotherapy is delivered.
Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.
Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arjun Sahgal | Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto ON | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auckland City Hospital | Grafton | Aucklund | 1023 | Australia | ||
| Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34126044 | Result | Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11. | |
| 30003994 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions 20 Gy in 5 fractions |
| FG001 | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 31, 2018 | Jul 6, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Radiation |
|
| Radiation Site Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months Using MRI Imaging | Radiation site progression was defined as:
| 6 months. |
| Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months | Proportion of participants who were alive at 6 months in study. | 6 months post radiation |
| Liverpool |
| New South Wales |
| 2170 |
| Australia |
| Princess Alexandra Hospital | Brisbane | Queensland | 4102 | Australia |
| Royal Adelaide Hospital | Adelaide | South Australia | 5000 | Australia |
| Peter McCallum Cancer Institute | Melbourne | Victoria | 3002 | Australia |
| Peter Mac - Sunshine Hospital | St Albans | Victoria | 3021 | Australia |
| Canberra Hospital | Garran | ACT 2605 | Australia |
| Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital | Herston | 4029 | Australia |
| Tom Baker Cancer Centre | Calgary | Alberta | T2N 4N2 | Canada |
| Cross Cancer Institute | Edmonton | Alberta | T6G 1Z2 | Canada |
| BCCA - Centre for the North | Prince George | British Columbia | V2M 7E9 | Canada |
| BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre | Vancouver | British Columbia | V5Z 4E6 | Canada |
| BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre | Victoria | British Columbia | V8R 6V5 | Canada |
| CancerCare Manitoba | Winnipeg | Manitoba | R3E 0V9 | Canada |
| Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences | Hamilton | Ontario | L8V 5C2 | Canada |
| London Regional Cancer Program | London | Ontario | N6A 5W9 | Canada |
| Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H 8L6 | Canada |
| Odette Cancer Centre | Toronto | Ontario | M4N 3M5 | Canada |
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2M9 | Canada |
| CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H2X 3E4 | Canada |
| CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec | Québec | Quebec | G1R 2J6 | Canada |
| Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1H 5N4 | Canada |
| Derived |
| Tseng CL, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Lee YK, Ruschin M, Atenafu EG, Campbell M, Maralani P, Yang V, Yee A, Sahgal A. Imaging-Based Outcomes for 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions for Patients with de Novo Spinal Metastases Treated With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 1;102(3):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.047. Epub 2018 Jul 10. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions 20 Gy in 5 fractions |
| BG001 | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| ECOG Performance Status | 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction.
| Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Worst pain score | Pain score range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) | SINS is used to assess the stability of the spine in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. It ranges from 0 to 18; with 0-6 as stable, 7 - 12 as indeterminate and 13-18 instable. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Histology | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Mass on imaging | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Phase III: Complete Pain Response at 3 Months Post-radiation | A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) . | ITT population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Complete Pain Response at 6 Months Post Radiation Based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party Criteria | A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) . | ITT population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months post radiation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Radiation Site Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months Using MRI Imaging | Radiation site progression was defined as:
| ITT population | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants by arm | 6 months. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months | Proportion of participants who were alive at 6 months in study. | ITT population. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of all participants | 6 months post radiation |
|
|
6 months.
Adverse events graded according to CTCAE V4.0
In the comments, it says that the number of patients in safety analysis does not agree with the patients flow chart. However, they are indeed different. As 115 and 114 were randomized to CRT and SBRT arm respectively, but there were 4 patients on SBRT arm did not receive any treatment, which leads to the difference. (Safety analyses were based on as-treated population)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy | Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions 20 Gy in 5 fractions | 30 | 115 | 4 | 115 | 17 | 115 |
| EG001 | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions | 25 | 114 | 3 | 110 | 9 | 110 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Esophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE V4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Keyue Ding | Canadian Cancer Trials Group | 16135336430 | 77705 | kding@ctg.queensu.ca |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 7, 2020 | May 10, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 31, 2018 | Jul 6, 2021 | ICF_002.pdf |
|
|
|
| Australia |
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
| > 6 |
|
|
|
| Radiosensitive |
|
|
|
| Present |
|
|
| SD |
|
| PD |
|
| In-evalable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|