Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to see whether one dose of palliative radiation therapy directed to the liver in combination with standard BSC might help to reduce liver pain/discomfort due to cancer when compared to getting standard BSC alone.
The standard treatment for liver cancer pain or discomfort like yours is known as best supportive care (BSC) and includes pain-relieving medicines called analgesics. This type of treatment can help in some cases; however, some analgesics require a healthy liver to work properly. This means that there are many patients who have a hard time managing their liver cancer pain/discomfort with BSC alone.
Sometimes radiation therapy is given in the "palliative" setting meaning it is designed to treat the pain/discomfort and not necessarily to shrink or eliminate the tumour. Palliative radiation therapy is often given when patients have painful bone tumours, but is not yet widely used to treat liver pain/discomfort. Palliative radiation therapy is usually given in smaller amounts and less frequently than other kinds of radiation therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best Supportive Care | Active Comparator | Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive best supportive care alone |
|
| Best Supportive Care + RT 8 Gy/1 | Experimental | Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive best supportive care plus radiation therapy (8 Gy in 1 fraction), |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Supportive Care | Other | Including analgesics, palliative care and/or pain specialist assessment as needed |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients Achieving Significant Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort | • Proportion of patients achieving improvement of liver cancer pain/discomfort by ≥ 2 points in pain "intensity at worst " on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to day 30. | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients Alive at Day 90. | Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for overall survival defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. | 90 days |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving a 25% Reduction in Opioid Use at 30 Days (Employing Daily Morphine Equivalence Scale). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A diagnosis of cancer by at least one criterion listed below:
Largest burden of cancer in the liver is confirmed with CT scan or MRI corresponding to the clinically painful area done within 120 days prior to randomization.
Diffuse (infiltrative involving > 50% of the liver), multifocal (> 10 lesions) or locally advanced cancer (at least one lesion > 10cm, vascular invasion, or multiple lesions with at least one > 6cm) involving the liver.
In the investigator's opinion, patient is unsuitable for or refractory to standard local and regional therapies. For example:
Unsuitable for, high risk for, or refractory to, standard systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapy (e.g. sorafenib).
Patient reports moderate or severe pain/discomfort prior to the baseline evaluation and this pain is considered "stable" over a period of up to 7 days prior to randomization.
Definition of moderate pain:
Patient reports level of 4-6 (on a BPI scale from 0 to 10) pain or discomfort "at its worst in the past 24 hours", occurring in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen, the upper abdomen and/or referred to the right shoulder, attributable to liver cancer.
Definition of severe pain:
Patient reports level of 7-10 (on a BPI scale from 0 to 10) pain or discomfort "at its worst in the past 24 hours", occurring in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen, the upper abdomen and/or referred to the right shoulder, attributable to liver cancer.
Definition of "stable" pain:
Patient must show moderate or severe "stable" pain by reporting a score of 4 or greater (on 2 separate days within the 7 day period prior to randomization) with the difference of these scores being 0, 1, 2 or 3.
Patient reports moderate or severe pain (i.e. pain score is 4 or higher). This baseline score must also be stable compared to the most recent pre-baseline pain score with the difference between these scores being 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Blood work obtained within 14 days prior to randomization as follows:
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-3 within 14 days of Randomization (see Appendix II).
Life expectancy of > 3 months.
18 years of age or older at the time of randomization.
Patient is willing to complete the Pre-Baseline Pain/Discomfort Questionnaire and the Pain/Discomfort and Medication Questionnaire in English, French or other validated language (please contact the HE.1 Study Coordinator). The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines prior to randomization. Unwillingness to complete the Pre-Baseline Pain/Discomfort Questionnaire and Pain/Discomfort and Medication Questionnaire will make the patient ineligible for the study.
Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the QoL questionnaires in English, French or other languages in which the FACT-Hep is available. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines prior to randomization.
Inability (illiteracy in languages listed above, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the QoL questionnaires will make the patient ineligible for QoL assessment.
Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.
Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laura Ann Dawson | Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | A1B 3V6 | Canada | ||
| Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39245060 | Result | Dawson LA, Ringash J, Fairchild A, Stos P, Dennis K, Mahmud A, Stuckless TL, Vincent F, Roberge D, Follwell M, Wong RKW, Jonker DJ, Knox JJ, Zimmermann C, Wong P, Barry AS, Gaudet M, Wong RKS, Purdie TG, Tu D, O'Callaghan CJ. Palliative radiotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with painful hepatic cancer (CCTG HE1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Oct;25(10):1337-1346. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00438-8. Epub 2024 Sep 5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Radiotherapy Combined With Best Supportive Care | Patients receive a radiation therapy with the use of 8 Gy in one fraction to the whole (or near-whole) liver together with the best supportive care. |
| FG001 | Best Supportive Care Alone | Patients receive only the best supportive care. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
All patients randomized
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Radiotherapy Combined With Best Supportive Care | Patients receive a radiation therapy with the use of 8 Gy in one fraction to the whole (or near-whole) liver together with the best supportive care. |
| BG001 | Best Supportive Care Alone |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Patients Achieving Significant Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort | • Proportion of patients achieving improvement of liver cancer pain/discomfort by ≥ 2 points in pain "intensity at worst " on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to day 30. | All patients who completed both baseline and day 30 assessments | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days |
|
30 days
Only grade 2 or higher adverse events were collected.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Radiotherapy Combined With Best Supportive Care | Patients receive a radiation therapy with the use of 8 Gy in one fraction to the whole (or near-whole) liver together with the best supportive care. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Chris O'Callaghan | Canadian Cancer Trials Group | 6135336430 | cocallaghan@ctg.queensu.ca |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 7, 2018 | Jun 3, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 9, 2022 | Jun 3, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006528 | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Palliative Radiation Therapy | Radiation | 8 Gy in 1 fraction in whole liver or near whole liver. Including anti-emetic pre-medications |
|
| 30 days |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort by ≥ 2 Points in Pain "Intensity at Worst " AND With no Increase in Opioid Use (Employing Daily Morphine Equivalence Scale) on BPI From Baseline to 30 Days. | 30 days |
| Barrie |
| Ontario |
| L4M 6M2 |
| Canada |
| Kingston Health Sciences Centre | Kingston | Ontario | K7L 2V7 | Canada |
| Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H 8L6 | Canada |
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2M9 | Canada |
| CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H2X 3E4 | Canada |
| Centre hospitalier regional de Trois-Rivieres | Trois-Rivières | Quebec | G8Z 3R9 | Canada |
Patients receive only the best supportive care.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Perfromance Status | 0: Fully active; no performance restrictions.
| Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Patients receive only the best supportive care.
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Alive at Day 90. | Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for overall survival defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. | All patients randomized | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of alive at 90 days | 90 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving a 25% Reduction in Opioid Use at 30 Days (Employing Daily Morphine Equivalence Scale). | Patients who reported taking opioid medications in the 24 hours prior to their both baseline and day 30 assessments | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort by ≥ 2 Points in Pain "Intensity at Worst " AND With no Increase in Opioid Use (Employing Daily Morphine Equivalence Scale) on BPI From Baseline to 30 Days. | Patients who completed both baseline and day 30 pain/discomfort assessments and reported taking opioid medications in the 24 hours prior to their both baseline and day 30 assessments | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
| 33 |
| 0 |
| 33 |
| 19 |
| 33 |
| EG001 | Best Supportive Care Alone | Patients receive only the best supportive care. | 24 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 11 | 33 |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|