Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective multicenter randomized blinded study comparing Aquablation of the prostate with the AQUABEAM System and TURP for the treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). The primary endpoints for safety and effectiveness were measured at 3 and 6 months, respectively, and subjects were followed out to 5 years to collect long-term clinical data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | AQUABEAM System |
|
| Active Comparator | Active Comparator | Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQUABEAM System | Device | The AQUABEAM system, a personalized image-guided tissue removal system, utilizes proprietary heat-free high-velocity waterjet technology to resect and remove prostate tissue. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events (Clavien-Dindo Grading System Grade 2 or Higher or Any Grade 1 Event Resulting in Persistent Disability) | The primary safety endpoint is the proportion of subjects with adverse events rated as probably or definitely related to the study procedure classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 or higher or any Grade 1 event resulting in persistent disability (e.g. ejaculatory disorder or erectile dysfunction) evidenced through 3 months post treatment. Note that the Clavien-Dindo classification scheme is for grading postoperative complications not events that reflect lack of effective treatment. Results are presented as a percentage rounded to the whole number. | Three months post-treatment |
| Change Score of IPSS Questionnaire Between Baseline and 6 Months | The primary effectiveness endpoint is the IPSS change score from baseline to 6 months. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ranges from 0 to 35. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. | Six months post-treatment |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term Effectiveness as Measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 Months | Change score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 months as compared to baseline. Score range is from 0 to 35, with a low score associated with more favorable outcomes. Change score is calculated from two time points as the value at the 60 months point minus the value at the baseline. | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Gilling, M.D. | Urology BOP | Principal Investigator |
| Claus Roehrborn, M.D. | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urology Centers of Alabama | Birmingham | Alabama | 35209 | United States | ||
| San Diego Clinical Trials |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29360529 | Background | Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP Jr, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. WATER: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Aquablation(R) vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1252-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.065. Epub 2018 Jan 31. | |
| 30552937 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment | AQUABEAM System The AQUABEAM system, a personalized image-guided tissue removal system, utilizes proprietary heat-free high-velocity waterjet technology to resect and remove prostate tissue. |
| FG001 | Active Comparator |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 3, 2020 | Apr 14, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All study subjects and the study site follow-up team are blinded to the assigned treatment until the year 3 follow-up.
| Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) | Procedure | Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a type of prostate surgery done to relieve moderate to severe urinary symptoms caused by an enlarged prostate, a condition known as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) |
|
| International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 Months | International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 months. Score range is from 0 to 35, with a low score associated with more favorable outcomes. | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
| International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL) at 60 Months | International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL) sub-score. Score range is from 0 to 6, with a low score associated with more favorable outcomes. | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
| Change in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) at 60 Months From Baseline | Change in Uroflowmetry measurement of voided urine (in milliliters) per unit of time (in seconds) at 60 Months from Baseline. Change score is calculated from two time points as the value at the 60 months point minus the value at the baseline. | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
| Change in Post-void Residual (PVR) at 60 Months From Baseline | Change in Post-void residual (PVR) urine test at 60 Months from Baseline. Change score is calculated from two time points as the value at the 60 months point minus the value at the baseline. | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
| La Mesa |
| California |
| 91942 |
| United States |
| University of Southern California, Institute of Urology | Los Angeles | California | 90089 | United States |
| Urology Associates, P.C. | Englewood | Colorado | 80113 | United States |
| Adult & Pediatric Urology P.C. | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| Albany Medical College | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Wake Forest School of Medicine | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390-9110 | United States |
| Houston Metro Urology | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of Vermont College of Medicine | Burlington | Vermont | 05401 | United States |
| Virginia Urology | Richmond | Virginia | 23235 | United States |
| Royal Melbourne Hospital | Melbourne | Victoria | 3050 | Australia |
| Tauranga Urology Research Ltd. | Tauranga | 3112 | New Zealand |
| Frimley Park Hospital | Frimley | Surrey | GU16 7UJ | United Kingdom |
| Princess of Wales Hospital | Bridgend | Wales | CF31 1RQ | United Kingdom |
| Addenbrooke's Treatment Center | Cambridge | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| Background |
| Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Roehrborn C. Randomized Controlled Trial of Aquablation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-year Outcomes. Urology. 2019 Mar;125:169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 12. |
| 31028614 | Background | Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP Jr, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Two-Year Outcomes After Aquablation Compared to TURP: Efficacy and Ejaculatory Improvements Sustained. Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1326-1336. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00952-3. Epub 2019 Apr 26. |
| 32065861 | Background | Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP Jr, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Three-year outcomes after Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a blinded randomized trial. Can J Urol. 2020 Feb;27(1):10072-10079. |
| 35150215 | Background | Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Kaufman RP Jr, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, Roehrborn CG. Five-year outcomes for Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a double-blind, randomized trial in men with LUTS due to BPH. Can J Urol. 2022 Feb;29(1):10960-10968. |
| 30721737 | Derived | Pimentel MA, Yassaie O, Gilling P. Urodynamic Outcomes After Aquablation. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 2. |
| 29873008 | Derived | Chughtai B, Thomas D. Pooled Aquablation Results for American Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Large Prostates (60-150 cc). Adv Ther. 2018 Jun;35(6):832-838. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0722-0. Epub 2018 Jun 5. |
Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a type of prostate surgery done to relieve moderate to severe urinary symptoms caused by an enlarged prostate, a condition known as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| 1 Week Follow-Up |
|
| 1 Month Follow-Up |
|
| 3 Months Follow-Up |
|
| 6 Months Follow-Up |
|
| 12 Months Follow-Up |
|
| 24 Months Follow-Up |
|
| 36 Months Follow-Up |
|
| 60 Months Follow-Up |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment | AQUABEAM system The AQUABEAM system, a personalized image-guided tissue removal system, utilizes proprietary heat-free high-velocity waterjet technology to resect and remove prostate tissue. |
| BG001 | Active Comparator | Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a type of prostate surgery done to relieve moderate to severe urinary symptoms caused by an enlarged prostate, a condition known as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events (Clavien-Dindo Grading System Grade 2 or Higher or Any Grade 1 Event Resulting in Persistent Disability) | The primary safety endpoint is the proportion of subjects with adverse events rated as probably or definitely related to the study procedure classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 or higher or any Grade 1 event resulting in persistent disability (e.g. ejaculatory disorder or erectile dysfunction) evidenced through 3 months post treatment. Note that the Clavien-Dindo classification scheme is for grading postoperative complications not events that reflect lack of effective treatment. Results are presented as a percentage rounded to the whole number. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Three months post-treatment |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change Score of IPSS Questionnaire Between Baseline and 6 Months | The primary effectiveness endpoint is the IPSS change score from baseline to 6 months. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ranges from 0 to 35. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. | The variation between the overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome and the completed number on the participant flow at this follow-up is due to this specific outcome assessment not being done by all participants who completed this follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Six months post-treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Long-term Effectiveness as Measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 Months | Change score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 months as compared to baseline. Score range is from 0 to 35, with a low score associated with more favorable outcomes. Change score is calculated from two time points as the value at the 60 months point minus the value at the baseline. | The variation between the overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome and the completed number on the participant flow at this follow-up is due to this specific outcome assessment not being done by all participants who completed this follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | change in score on a scale | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 Months | International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 60 months. Score range is from 0 to 35, with a low score associated with more favorable outcomes. | The variation between the overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome and the completed number on the participant flow at this follow-up is due to this specific outcome assessment not being done by all participants who completed this follow-up. | Posted | Median | Full Range | score on a scale | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL) at 60 Months | International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL) sub-score. Score range is from 0 to 6, with a low score associated with more favorable outcomes. | The variation between the overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome and the completed number on the participant flow at this follow-up is due to this specific outcome assessment not being done by all participants who completed this follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) at 60 Months From Baseline | Change in Uroflowmetry measurement of voided urine (in milliliters) per unit of time (in seconds) at 60 Months from Baseline. Change score is calculated from two time points as the value at the 60 months point minus the value at the baseline. | The variation between the overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome and the completed number on the participant flow at this follow-up is due to this specific outcome assessment not being done by all participants who completed this follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL/s | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Post-void Residual (PVR) at 60 Months From Baseline | Change in Post-void residual (PVR) urine test at 60 Months from Baseline. Change score is calculated from two time points as the value at the 60 months point minus the value at the baseline. | The variation between the overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome and the completed number on the participant flow at this follow-up is due to this specific outcome assessment not being done by all participants who completed this follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL | 60 months following original surgical intervention |
|
|
5 years
There were no device-related adverse events reported in the study, and there were no unanticipated procedure-related adverse events reported in the study. Of the adverse events resulting in mortality, none were procedure-related, device-related, or urological.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment | AQUABEAM System The AQUABEAM system, a personalized image-guided tissue removal system, utilizes proprietary heat-free high-velocity waterjet technology to resect and remove prostate tissue. | 4 | 116 | 24 | 116 | 75 | 116 |
| EG001 | Active Comparator | Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a type of prostate surgery done to relieve moderate to severe urinary symptoms caused by an enlarged prostate, a condition known as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) | 1 | 65 | 14 | 65 | 53 | 65 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder neck contracture (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bleeding | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac (non-procedure-related) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Non-urologic | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other bleeding (non-procedure-related) | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Penial infection (non-procedure-related) | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Prostate cancer (non-procedure-related) | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stricture or adhesions | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stricture or adhesions (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary retention (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract stones (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary urgency/frequency/difficulty/leakage | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary urgency/frequency/difficulty/leakage (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation (non-procedure-related) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bladder neck contracture | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bladder neck contracture (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bladder pain/spasm | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bleeding | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bleeding (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Decreased libido | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysuria (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Erectile Dysfunction | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Erectile Dysfunction (non-procedure-related) | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hydrocele | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension (non-procedure-related) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Non-urologic | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Overactive bladder (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Penile disorder (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Perineal swelling | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Prostatitis (non-procedure-related) | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Retrograde ejaculation | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Retrograde ejaculation (non-procedure-related) | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rising PSA (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sexual dysfunction (non-procedure-related) | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stricture or adhesions | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stricture or adhesions (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Swollen Testicles | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urethral damage | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary retention (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract stones (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary urgency/frequency/difficulty/leakage | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary urgency/frequency/difficulty/leakage (non-procedure-related) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angela Lee | PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation | 6502327215 | a.lee@procept-biorobotics.com |
| Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 23, 2016 | Aug 29, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011470 | Prostatic Hyperplasia |
| D059411 | Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D020924 | Urological Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020728 | Transurethral Resection of Prostate |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011468 | Prostatectomy |
| D013521 | Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male |
| D013520 | Urologic Surgical Procedures |
| D013519 | Urogenital Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| Black |
|
| White |
|
| Other |
|
| NA |
|
| United States |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Australia |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|