Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUM00098202 | Other Identifier | University of Michigan | |
| P01CA059827 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Successful treatment of lung cancer with radiation therapy requires that the physicians determine exactly where the tumor is in the patient's body and seek to limit any unnecessary radiation to normal parts of the body. This study is designed to apply functional imaging, Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) ("a PET scan") and Ventilation/Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography (V/Q SPECT) ("a perfusion scan"), before treatment and then again during treatment to see if this scanning helps predict how well the treatment works and how well the lung functions during treatment. FDG-PET is a modern technology that uses small amounts of a radioactive glucose (FDG) to make images of the whole body and areas of active cancer. V/Q SPECT is an image mapping tool that helps assess how well the lungs are working. A Computerized Tomography (CT) will also be performed along with both of these procedures to help the researchers see clearly where the cancer or the healthy lung is located.
The researchers are also doing blood and urine tests in this study to look for markers to see if this helps them determine the patient's risk of developing side effects from radiation to the lungs. The researchers hope by using these types of tests that they can have more information to help decrease the amount of toxicity patients have from this type of treatment. The researchers hope that this study will help them in the future to design radiation treatment plans that provide the best treatment for each individual patient.
This is a pilot study to improve local tumor control while maintaining the same rate of treatment toxicity by adapting therapy to the uninvolved lung and esophagus while continuing to adapt therapy to the tumor for patients with Stage II/III NSCLC.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide. In 2012, there were 226,160 new cases and 160,340 deaths related to lung cancer in the United States. Approximately, 80-85% of lung cancers are NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), and 40% of these are locally advanced (stage II/III) at diagnosis. The current standard of care for these patients is "one size fits all" RT (Radiation Therapy) with concurrent chemotherapy in uniform regimens. Even after concurrent chemoradiation, however, the five year overall survival was still about 15%; almost one half of the patients failed locally. At the same time, intensification of both radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy may result in excessive toxicity or incomplete treatment. Therefore, it is critical to tailor the treatment to each individual's sensitivity in combination with functional imaging guided response-driven treatment and biomarker guided individualized dose prescription, thus taking into consideration both the tumor and toxicity profile.
Evidence suggests that high-dose radiation has the potential to improve local-regional control and overall survival in patients treated with fractionated therapy with concurrent chemotherapy.
However, it is challenging to deliver high dose RT in the majority of patients with locally advanced NSCLC without exceeding doses to organs at risk and causing significant side effects.
Investigators hypothesized that they could develop safer and more effective therapy by adapting treatment to the individual patient's response. With respect to the tumor, investigators hypothesized, that they could improve outcome by redistributing dose to the more aggressive regions of the tumor, assessed using mid-treatment FDG-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scanning. With respect to uninvolved organs, investigators need methods of estimating tolerable radiation doses for the individual patient rather than the population average. Such a strategy requires assessing both global and regional normal lung function and the technology to deliver dose in a manner that minimizes damage to functional lung and esophagus.
During-RT FDG-PET/CT potentially can provide important benefits to individual patients by intensifying dose to more resistent tumor, allowing early changes to alternative, more efficacious treatment or by avoiding the unnecessary toxicity related to ineffective therapy.
Patients will also undergo a during treatment V/Q SPECT (Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography) scan, as an adaptive plan based on during-treatment SPECT may further optimize PART (Personalized Adaptive Radiotherapy) to avoid high dose radiation to the well-functioning regions, and would thus decrease RILT (Radiation Induced Lung Toxicity).
The combination of pre- and during V/Q SPECT can classify the lung into different functional regions, and a strategy to give differential priority to the regions has been developed to minimize lung damage.
Investigators plan to continue to collect data on serum biomarkers to further refine their biophysical model with the ultimate goal of individualizing radiation dose prescription.
By identifying high risk patients and adjusting OAR (Organs at Risk) dose limits to the threshold of tolerance, investigators anticipate a significant reduction in the incidence of toxicity from UMCC 2007.123 (NCT01190527) without compromised tumor control by applying the model to optimize radiation planning.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response-driven Adaptive RT | Experimental | Patients will receive treatment 5 days per week, in once daily fractions, for 30 treatments with dose per fraction individually adapted over the final 9 treatments. Patients may also receive concurrent chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. Patients may receive consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) or immunotherapy (durvalumab) at the discretion of the medical oncologist. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response-driven Adaptive Radiation Therapy | Radiation |
| ||
| Carboplatin |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Number of Patients for Whom Treatment is Feasible. | To determine the feasibility of the proposed adaptive treatment strategy, we will look at the number of patients for whom treatment is feasible. Treatment is feasible if we are able to deliver the full treatment, using the image based spatial replanning and complete the cytokine assays in a short enough timeframe to adapt radiation dose. | 6 weeks (30 treatments, 5 days per week) |
| The Number of Patients That Experience Grade 2 or Greater Lung Toxicity | Lung toxicity will be graded using CTCAE v4.0. These will include, but not be limited to: cough, dyspnea, pneumonitis, radiation pneumonitis, and radiographic or clinical pulmonary fibrosis. | Up to 24 months |
| The Number of Patients That Experience Grade 2 or Greater Esophageal Toxicity | Esophageal toxicities will be graded using CTCAE v4.0. These will include, but not be limited to esophagitis. | Up to 3 months |
| Comparison of Delivered Dose to Dose That Would Have Been Administered Using the Criteria Described in Protocol UMCC 2007.123 (NCT01190527) | Investigators will generate the treatment plan (and hence dose to PET avid region) each patient would have received if they had been treated on protocol UMCC 2007.123 (NCT01190527), which redistributed dose to the PET avid region but not through normal tissue. These dose values will then be compared to the doses actually given to assess for any mean differences. | 6 weeks (30 treatments, 5 days per week) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Local Progression | Defined as the time from start of treatment to time of local/regional progression on PET, summarized with the Kaplan-Meier method. | Up to 60 months |
| Overall Survival Time |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shruti Jolly, M.D. | University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48105 | United States | ||
| University of Michigan Cancer Center |
Two patients were enrolled but were never treated, 5 patients started treatment but did not complete
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Response-driven Adaptive RT | Patients received treatment 5 days per week, in once daily fractions, for 30 treatments with dose per fraction individually adapted over the final 9 treatments. Patients may have also received concurrent chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. Patients may have received consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) or immunotherapy (durvalumab) at the discretion of the medical oncologist. Response-driven Adaptive Radiation Therapy Carboplatin: AUC 2 concurrent with RT; AUC 6 during consolidation. Given IV Paclitaxel: 40 mg/m^2 IV concurrent with RT; 200 mg/m^2 during consolidation. Given IV FDG-PET V/Q SPECT Durvalumab: 10 mg/kg during consolidation. Given IV |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 22, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
AUC 2 concurrent with RT; AUC 6 during consolidation. Given IV |
|
| Paclitaxel | Drug | 40 mg/m^2 IV concurrent with RT; 200 mg/m^2 during consolidation. Given IV |
|
| FDG-PET | Device |
|
|
| V/Q SPECT | Device |
|
|
| Durvalumab | Drug | 10 mg/kg during consolidation. Given IV |
|
Defined as the time from start of treatment to death.
| Up to 60 months |
| Ann Arbor |
| Michigan |
| 48109 |
| United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Response-driven Adaptive RT | Patients received treatment 5 days per week, in once daily fractions, for 30 treatments with dose per fraction individually adapted over the final 9 treatments. Patients may have also received concurrent chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. Patients may have received consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) or immunotherapy (durvalumab) at the discretion of the medical oncologist. Response-driven Adaptive Radiation Therapy Carboplatin: AUC 2 concurrent with RT; AUC 6 during consolidation. Given IV Paclitaxel: 40 mg/m^2 IV concurrent with RT; 200 mg/m^2 during consolidation. Given IV FDG-PET V/Q SPECT Durvalumab: 10 mg/kg during consolidation. Given IV |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Number of Patients for Whom Treatment is Feasible. | To determine the feasibility of the proposed adaptive treatment strategy, we will look at the number of patients for whom treatment is feasible. Treatment is feasible if we are able to deliver the full treatment, using the image based spatial replanning and complete the cytokine assays in a short enough timeframe to adapt radiation dose. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 weeks (30 treatments, 5 days per week) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | The Number of Patients That Experience Grade 2 or Greater Lung Toxicity | Lung toxicity will be graded using CTCAE v4.0. These will include, but not be limited to: cough, dyspnea, pneumonitis, radiation pneumonitis, and radiographic or clinical pulmonary fibrosis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 24 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | The Number of Patients That Experience Grade 2 or Greater Esophageal Toxicity | Esophageal toxicities will be graded using CTCAE v4.0. These will include, but not be limited to esophagitis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 3 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Comparison of Delivered Dose to Dose That Would Have Been Administered Using the Criteria Described in Protocol UMCC 2007.123 (NCT01190527) | Investigators will generate the treatment plan (and hence dose to PET avid region) each patient would have received if they had been treated on protocol UMCC 2007.123 (NCT01190527), which redistributed dose to the PET avid region but not through normal tissue. These dose values will then be compared to the doses actually given to assess for any mean differences. | 47 participants from this trial and 15 from the previous trial, UMCC 2007.123 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | average total physical dose (Gy) | 6 weeks (30 treatments, 5 days per week) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Local Progression | Defined as the time from start of treatment to time of local/regional progression on PET, summarized with the Kaplan-Meier method. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients | Up to 60 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival Time | Defined as the time from start of treatment to death. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients | Up to 60 months |
|
|
All adverse event data (serious and non-serious) collected from the time of the initial study treatment administration through 36 months after the last dose of study treatment. Data was collected during a 6 year period.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Response-driven Adaptive RT | Patients received treatment 5 days per week, in once daily fractions, for 30 treatments with dose per fraction individually adapted over the final 9 treatments. Patients may have also received concurrent chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. Patients may have received consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) or immunotherapy (durvalumab) at the discretion of the medical oncologist. Response-driven Adaptive Radiation Therapy Carboplatin: AUC 2 concurrent with RT; AUC 6 during consolidation. Given IV Paclitaxel: 40 mg/m^2 IV concurrent with RT; 200 mg/m^2 during consolidation. Given IV FDG-PET V/Q SPECT Durvalumab: 10 mg/kg during consolidation. Given IV | 22 | 47 | 13 | 47 | 47 | 47 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute coronary syndrome | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial Flutter | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopleural fistula | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Esophageal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| malignant neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| non-cardiac chest pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| stroke | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| vascular disorders- other, specify | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | ischemia cerbrovascular |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspiration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis radiation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Esophageal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Esophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clinical fibrosis | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rib fracture | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiccups | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion related reaction | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleuritic pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Altered mental status | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary fibrosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radiation recall reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| superficial soft tissue fibrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight loss | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClinicalTrials.gov CC Admin | University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center | 734-936-9499 | clinicaltrialsgov_ccadmin@med.umich.edu |
| Oct 10, 2023 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jul 24, 2020 | Oct 10, 2023 | ICF_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002289 | Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002283 | Carcinoma, Bronchogenic |
| D001984 | Bronchial Neoplasms |
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016190 | Carboplatin |
| D017239 | Paclitaxel |
| D049268 | Positron-Emission Tomography |
| C000613593 | durvalumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
| D014055 | Tomography, Emission-Computed |
| D007090 | Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D007089 | Image Enhancement |
| D010781 | Photography |
| D011877 | Radionuclide Imaging |
| D014054 | Tomography |
| D003947 | Diagnostic Techniques, Radioisotope |
Not provided
Not provided
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|