Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4) in participants with metastatic breast cancer which has progressed during or after standard chemotherapy and which is not amenable to curative therapy. Those who are maintaining a response to therapy or who have stable disease at the end of the formal study period will continue treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Approximately 120 participants will be enrolled.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab 1050 mg | Experimental | Participants will not receive a loading dose, but will receive pertuzumab 1050 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
|
| Pertuzumab 420 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive a loading dose of 840 mg via IV infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab | Drug | Participants will receive one of two IV treatment regimens with pertuzumab: either 420 mg every 3 weeks, with an initial 840-mg loading dose, or 1050 mg every 3 weeks with no loading dose administered. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | Objective tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Time to response was defined as the time from treatment start to first documented response (ie, CR or PR). Participants with stable disease (SD) were censored from the last tumor assessment, and those with progressive disease (PD) or death were assigned an artificial censoring time of 1000 days. Time to response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trials | Hoffmann-La Roche | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camperdown | 2050 | Australia | ||||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pertuzumab 420 mg | Participants received a loading dose of 840 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
| FG001 | Pertuzumab 1050 mg | Participants did not receive a loading dose, but received pertuzumab 1050 mg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of pertuzumab.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Pertuzumab 420 mg | Participants received a loading dose of 840 mg via IV infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
| BG001 | Pertuzumab 1050 mg |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | Objective tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | ITT Population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
Up to approximately 1 year (from start of treatment until up to 7 weeks following the last infusion)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pertuzumab 420 mg | Participants received a loading dose of 840 mg via IV infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Recruitment was halted within the planned study design. The study was designed to stop recruitment following the interim analysis if the response rate (CR or PR) was <1 of 23 participants per arm after all participants completed at least 2 cycles.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Communications | Hoffmann-LaRoche | 800-821-8590 | genentech@druginfo.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C485206 | pertuzumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR or PR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were to be censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Death | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Time to Progression | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD. Time to progression was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Withdrew From the Study Early | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Time to Treatment Failure | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or early withdrawal from the study for death, toxicity, refusal/noncompliance, insufficient therapeutic response, or failure to return. Participants who did not experience PD or who did not withdraw from the study early were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to treatment failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Percentage of Participants Who Died | The percentage of participants who died was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | Up to approximately 2 years (from start of treatment until death) |
| Overall Survival | Overall survival was defined as the time from treatment start to death. Participants who did not die during follow-up were to be censored from the last known alive date. Overall survival was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier. | Up to approximately 2 years (from start of treatment until death) |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of SD | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of SD was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
| Apparent Half-Life (t1/2) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment using a receptor-binding, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the apparent t1/2 by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the time elapsed for pertuzumab concentrations to decrease by 50%. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days. | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Cmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL). | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The time of maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Tmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in days. | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine AUC to the last measurable observation (AUClast) and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) by non-compartmental analysis. The derived values were averaged among all participants and expressed in days by micrograms per milliliter (days*mcg/mL). | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Systemic Clearance (CL) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine CL by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the rate at which pertuzumab was removed from the body. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters per day (mL/day). | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the Vss by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the theoretical volume at which the total amount of pertuzumab would be uniformly distributed to produce the desired concentration. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters (mL). | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the MRT by non-compartmental analysis. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days. | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
| Number of Participants Experiencing a Drop in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) to a Value of Less Than 50% | Echocardiography was performed to determine LVEF, defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle as a percentage of end-diastolic volume. Theoretically, LVEF may range from 0 to 100%. The number of participants experiencing a drop in LVEF greater than or equal to (≥) 10 or 15 percentage points to a final LVEF of less than (<) 50% is reported here. | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; at the end of Cycles 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16; and up to 7 weeks following the last infusion) |
| Fitzroy |
| 3065 |
| Australia |
| Geelong | 3220 | Australia |
| Namur | 5000 | Belgium |
| Helsinki | 00029 | Finland |
| Tampere | 33520 | Finland |
| Hamburg | 20246 | Germany |
| Herne | 44625 | Germany |
| München | 81675 | Germany |
| Milan | 20133 | Italy |
| Parma | 43100 | Italy |
| Amsterdam | 1081 HV | Netherlands |
| Barcelona | 08035 | Spain |
| Barcelona | 08907 | Spain |
| Valencia | 46009 | Spain |
| Edinburgh | EH4 2XU | United Kingdom |
| London | SE1 9RT | United Kingdom |
| Manchester | M20 4BX | United Kingdom |
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Refused Treatment |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
Participants did not receive a loading dose, but received pertuzumab 1050 mg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Participants received a loading dose of 840 mg via IV infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
| OG001 | Pertuzumab 1050 mg | Participants did not receive a loading dose, but received pertuzumab 1050 mg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. |
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Time to response was defined as the time from treatment start to first documented response (ie, CR or PR). Participants with stable disease (SD) were censored from the last tumor assessment, and those with progressive disease (PD) or death were assigned an artificial censoring time of 1000 days. Time to response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | ITT Population. | Posted | Median | Full Range | weeks | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR or PR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | ITT Population. | Posted | Median | Full Range | weeks | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | ITT Population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were to be censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier. | ITT Population. | Posted | Median | Full Range | weeks | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Death | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD. | ITT Population. | Posted | Number | participants | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Progression | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD. Time to progression was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | ITT Population. | Posted | Median | Full Range | weeks | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Withdrew From the Study Early | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. | ITT Population. | Posted | Number | participants | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Treatment Failure | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or early withdrawal from the study for death, toxicity, refusal/noncompliance, insufficient therapeutic response, or failure to return. Participants who did not experience PD or who did not withdraw from the study early were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to treatment failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks. | ITT Population. | Posted | Median | Full Range | weeks | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Died | The percentage of participants who died was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | Safety Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of pertuzumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Up to approximately 2 years (from start of treatment until death) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival | Overall survival was defined as the time from treatment start to death. Participants who did not die during follow-up were to be censored from the last known alive date. Overall survival was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier. | Median survival was not reached because the study program was terminated early. Analysis of the incomplete data set was not performed because it could potentially produce skewed or statistically irrelevant data. | Posted | Up to approximately 2 years (from start of treatment until death) |
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of SD | Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of SD was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100. | ITT Population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Apparent Half-Life (t1/2) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment using a receptor-binding, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the apparent t1/2 by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the time elapsed for pertuzumab concentrations to decrease by 50%. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days. | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Cmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL). | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mcg/mL | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The time of maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Tmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in days. | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Median | Full Range | days | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine AUC to the last measurable observation (AUClast) and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) by non-compartmental analysis. The derived values were averaged among all participants and expressed in days by micrograms per milliliter (days*mcg/mL). | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis, and the number of participants analyzed (n) is presented here. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days*mcg/mL | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Systemic Clearance (CL) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine CL by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the rate at which pertuzumab was removed from the body. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters per day (mL/day). | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL/day | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the Vss by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the theoretical volume at which the total amount of pertuzumab would be uniformly distributed to produce the desired concentration. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters (mL). | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Pertuzumab | Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the MRT by non-compartmental analysis. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days. | ITT Population. Participants with missing PK data were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Experiencing a Drop in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) to a Value of Less Than 50% | Echocardiography was performed to determine LVEF, defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle as a percentage of end-diastolic volume. Theoretically, LVEF may range from 0 to 100%. The number of participants experiencing a drop in LVEF greater than or equal to (≥) 10 or 15 percentage points to a final LVEF of less than (<) 50% is reported here. | Safety Population. | Posted | Number | participants | Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; at the end of Cycles 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16; and up to 7 weeks following the last infusion) |
|
|
|
| 10 |
| 41 |
| 36 |
| 41 |
| EG001 | Pertuzumab 1050 mg | Participants did not receive a loading dose, but received pertuzumab 1050 mg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. | 8 | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Large intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ejection fraction decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ejection fraction decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Mucosal inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes simplex | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oesophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Irritable bowel syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (7.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |