Prospective Observational Study, Impact of Plasma Levels of Colistin in Patients With Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infection
Prospective Observational Study, Impact of Plasma Levels of Colistin in Patients With Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infection
This study purposed to examine the adequate range of therapeutic concentration for Korean people by observing curative effects, side effects, blood concentration, etc. in treating CRAB-infected patients with colistin.
Acinetobacter baumanii usually causes pneumonia and sepsis, and is susceptible to antibiotics such as ampicillin/sulbactam and carbapenem, but it easily becomes tolerant and there are few other drugs usable. Particularly in Korean patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), the percentage of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is increasing recently.
Colistin (polymyxin E) is antibiotic of polymyxin line used to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, and it produces bactericidal action by destroying bacterial cell membrane. Colistin was antibiotic isolated from Bacillius polymyxa subspecies colistinus first in Japan in 1949, and has long been used in clinic since 1959, but its use through intravenous infusion decreased in the 1970s due to acute kidney injury and neurotoxicity. Recently, however, it is being used more frequently for hospital infection by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria and, as a result, various studies are being conducted on colistin.
Colistin consists of over 30 different polymyxin compounds including colistin A (polymyxin E1) and colistin B (polymyxin E2), and colistimethate sodium (CMS) and colistin sulfate are used. In Korea, it is usually administered intravenously in the form of CMS, which is an inactive precursor. In the body, CMS is metabolized into various metabolites including colistin or is discharged through urine. In contrast, active metabolite colistin is hardly discharged through urine, and is removed through non-renal elimination, but the accurate extracorporeal elimination mechanism is still unknown. CMS reaches the peak serum concentration in 10 minutes from intravenous administration, and its half-life is 2.2 hours while the half-life of colistin 18.5 hours.
With regard to the bactericidal activity of colistin, the unbound area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) is important, and adequate exposure to the drug has been known to be important for curative effect, but it is still controversial what the optimal dose and interval are. Although the drug has been used long, the accurate measuring of colistin blood concentration became possible only in the mid 2000s and, therefore, pharmacokinetic research on the drug has been conducted relatively recently and there is increasing interest in the validity of established uses, adequate uses, therapeutic drug monitoring, etc. Two of the established uses of the drug are intravenous administration of 2.5~5mg/kg/day divided into 2~4 times to patients with normal renal function, adjusting the dose and interval of administration according to renal function (package insert), and the administration of loading dose followed by 2~3 times of administration depending on renal function. The major side effects of colistin are nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, and according to a recent study, the incidence of nephrotoxicity caused by colistin was 30~60%. Renal insufficiency is more frequent when vancomycin is used together in VAP. Renal insufficiency is known to be reversible, but some cases require dialysis. Known risk factors of renal insufficiency include cumulative CMS dose, combined use of drugs inducing renal insufficiency, female, and age.
There have been ex vivo studies for assessing the bactericidal effect of colistin for exploring its adequate uses and case studies for evaluating the risk factors of nephrotoxicity, one of the major side effects yet there are still controversial issues related to the drug. Furthermore, as most of these studies were conducted with Western subjects, their results are hardly applicable to Koreans as they are. Thus, this study purposed to examine the adequate range of therapeutic concentration for Korean people.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: