Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the comparison of two of re-expansion pulmonary physiotherapy in patients with chest tube. The study group received intermittent positive pressure intervention and the control group received incentive spirometry intervention associated with manual operation.
All the re-expansion methods increase lung volume increasing gradient of transpulmonary pressure (PL) representing the difference alveolar pressure and pleural pressure. Spontaneous deep breath increases the PL by reducing pleural pressure (active breathing exercises, breathing supporters and manual operation).
Muller resuscitator consists of a pneumatic valve feature designed to operate with medical oxygen. It is used intermittently or continuously for pulmonary re-expansion, with lower load imposed work, and increase the efficiency of gas exchange by improving volumes, lung capacity and breathing pattern, and reverse atelectasis.
However, studies show the paucity of data in the literature regarding the Muller Resuscitator in different forms and respiratory rehabilitation protocols. In addition, studies show lack of standardization of methods and resources used in respiratory therapy in patients with chest tube.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reanimator Group | Experimental | Reanimator of Muller Group (intermittent positive pressure): Patients allocated to this group received intermittent positive pressure breathing (resuscitator Muller, Engemed, Brazil), adjusting the positive pressure around 1.5 kgf / cm2, which corresponds to 15 20 cm / H2O, positive pressure was applied through a face mask (Respironics®), which was connected in a circuit extending along the Muller Resuscitator equipment applied continuously for four series 10 of the patient breaths active and with an interval of two minutes between them in Fowler 45 position |
|
| Control Group | Experimental | Control Group: In position Fowler 45, patients assigned to this group was administered as treatment lung expansion exercises using the incentive inspiratory flow (Respiron, NCS, Mexico) and concomitantly blocking contralateral to the drain maneuvers were performed, compression / decompression associated with the incentive spirometry (Respiron) consisting of 4 sets of 10 active patient breaths with an interval of two minutes between sets. Since the load of the respiratory stimulator will be zero throughout treatment (Table 1). Guidelines to the active, progressive and early mobilization. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reanimator group | Device | Resuscitator of Muller Group (intermittent positive pressure): Patients allocated to this group received intermittent positive pressure breathing (resuscitator Muller, Engemed, Brazil), adjusting the positive pressure around 1.5 kgf / cm2, which corresponds to 15 20 cm / H2O, positive pressure was applied through a face mask (Respironics®). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change Respiratory function | Ventilometry was evaluated in two stages: 1) before the intervention, 2) on the day of drain removal or discharge. The spirometer application is according to implement stable and acceptable criteria. TOBIN The measures of lung volumes forão performed with the spirometer (FERRARIS MK8 Wright ®) coupled to a nozzle. The patient was instructed to breathe quietly in the apparatus for a minute to read the minute volume (VM). During this period, it is checked the number of breaths, i.e., respiratory rate (RR) for calculating the tidal volume (VT) given by VC = VM / FR (ml). | before the intervention (pre) and after drain removal the tube (pos) for 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Saturation Oxygen | Oxygen saturation was assessed in two stages: 1) before the first intervention of the day 2) after daily intervention protocol until hospital discharge or removal of the chest tube. Patients were evaluated with breathing in ambient air (without supplemental oxygen) after 10 minutes of the procedure. The researcher used a pulse oximeter portable. | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain | by visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) was used to determine the degree of soreness daily during the hospitalization period and pre chest drainage and after the intervention. | 30 days |
| Hospitalization stay |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contraindications breathing equipment use positive pressure
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Paula R Dos Anjos, mestranda | Contact | 35 92015986 | pauladosanjos@yahoo.com.br | |
| Luiz C Martins, Doutor | Contact | 19 | luizpneumo@uol.com.br |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ana Paula R Dos Anjos, mestranda | University of Campinas, Brazil | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital santa Casa de Passos | Recruiting | Passos | Minas Gerais | 37900512 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15767562 | Background | Rahman NM, Chapman SJ, Davies RJ. Pleural effusion: a structured approach to care. Br Med Bull. 2005 Mar 14;72:31-47. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldh040. Print 2004. | |
| 20696692 | Background | Hooper C, Lee YC, Maskell N; BTS Pleural Guideline Group. Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii4-17. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136978. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Control | Device | Control Group: In position Fowler 45, patients assigned to this group was administered as treatment lung expansion exercises using the incentive inspiratory flow (Respiron, NCS, Mexico) and concomitantly blocking contralateral to the drain maneuvers were performed, compression / decompression associated with the incentive spirometry (Respiron) consisting of 4 sets of 10 active patient breaths with an interval of two minutes between sets. Since the load of the respiratory stimulator will be zero throughout treatment. Guidelines to the active, progressive and early mobilization. |
|
the number of days in the hospital after chest drainage to discharge should be recorded for each patient. All patients were followed during hospitalization.
| 30 days |
| Time length chest drain | The length of the chest drain was checked until hospital discharge. The drain removal criterion was filed by the medical team of the hospital thoracic surgery. Debt drain in ml was collected by nursing professionals who were blinded study. | 30 days |
| dyspnea | It was determined by the Borg scale, in two stages, before and after intervention in both groups. | 30 days |
| Hospital da Clínicas de campinas | Not yet recruiting | Campinas | São Paulo | 13083-888 | Brazil |
|
| 16623208 | Background | Porcel JM, Light RW. Diagnostic approach to pleural effusion in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Apr 1;73(7):1211-20. |
| 23909181 | Background | Woodrow P. Intrapleural chest drainage. Nurs Stand. 2013 Jun 5-11;27(40):49-56; quiz 58. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.06.27.40.49.e7373. |
| 23651575 | Background | Kao JH, Kao HK, Chen YW, Yu WK, Pan SW, Wang JH, Lien TC, Ho LI, Kou YR. Impact and predictors of prolonged chest tube duration in mechanically ventilated patients with acquired pneumothorax. Respir Care. 2013 Dec;58(12):2093-100. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02273. Epub 2013 May 7. |
| 11474953 | Background | Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Almgren SO, Tenling A. Chest physiotherapy after coronary artery bypass graft surgery--a comparison of three different deep breathing techniques. J Rehabil Med. 2001 Mar;33(2):79-84. doi: 10.1080/165019701750098920. |
| 17167013 | Background | Pasquina P, Tramer MR, Granier JM, Walder B. Respiratory physiotherapy to prevent pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1887-99. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1887. |
| 2009796 | Background | Hall JC, Tarala RA, Hall JL, Mander J. A multivariate analysis of the risk of pulmonary complications after laparotomy. Chest. 1991 Apr;99(4):923-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.99.4.923. |
| 16612452 | Background | Muller AP, Olandoski M, Macedo R, Costantini C, Guarita-Souza LC. [Comparative study between intermittent (Muller Reanimator) and continuous positive airway pressure in the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass grafting]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006 Mar;86(3):232-9. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006000300012. Epub 2006 Mar 30. Portuguese. |
| 21357311 | Background | Ludwig C, Angenendt S, Martins R, Mayer V, Stoelben E. Intermittent positive-pressure breathing after lung surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2011 Feb;19(1):10-3. doi: 10.1177/0218492310394664. |
| 1321525 | Background | Catterall WA, Striessnig J. Receptor sites for Ca2+ channel antagonists. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992 Jun;13(6):256-62. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90079-l. |
| 20363847 | Background | Holanda MA, Fortaleza SC, Alves-de-Almeida M, Winkeler GF, Reis RC, Felix JH, Lima JW, Pereira ED. Continuous positive airway pressure effects on regional lung aeration in patients with COPD: a high-resolution CT scan study. Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2):305-14. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2850. Epub 2010 Apr 2. |