Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim is to test whether rtfMRI-based neurofeedback training on anterior insula impacts pain empathy.
In the present study, investigators plan to use the real-time fMRI neurofeedback to train healthy subjects to learn volitional control over their own anterior insula (AI) activity. Then the effect of AI regulation will assessed by examining subjects' empathic responses and functional connectivity changes. Subjects were separated into two groups randomly. While the experimental group received specific neurofeedback from their own AI, the control group received sham NF from an unspecific region.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| neurofeedback training | Experimental | Neurofeedback training group receives neurofeedback from their own anterior insula. |
|
| sham control | Sham Comparator | Sham control group receives sham neurofeedback from a large control brain region. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| real-time fMRI neurofeedback training running on Turbo Brain voyager (TBV) 3.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands) | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neural Activity of Anterior Insula During Neorofeedback Training | Neural activity was analyzed using standard fMRI analysis procedure that examine neural activity during training of anterior insula regulation. The measures include BOLD signal analysis (reflecting neural activity strengths) as well as functional connectivity analysis (that examine the interaction between different brain regions). | three days. |
| Pain Empathy Rating Scores | Subjects were required to rate their empathic feeling towards painful pictures on a Likert Scale ranging from 1-9 (1 = not at all and 9 = very painful). The effects of training on the empathy for pain were analyzed comparing the feedback group with the controls group. For each subject differences were calculated between pictures that were preceded by a training compared to a no-training block. Within the context of the present design we expected that training-induced increases in anterior insula activity should lead to higher pain empathy ratings in the training group as compared to the control group. | three days. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Keith Kendrick, Dr. | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Neurofeedback Training | Neurofeedback training group receives neurofeedback from their own anterior insula. real-time fMRI neurofeedback training running on Turbo Brain voyager (TBV) 3.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands) |
| FG001 | Sham Control |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sham control group receives sham neurofeedback from a large control brain region. real-time fMRI neurofeedback training running on Turbo Brain voyager (TBV) 3.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands) |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Neurofeedback Training | Neurofeedback training group receives neurofeedback from their own anterior insula. real-time fMRI neurofeedback training running on Turbo Brain voyager (TBV) 3.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands) |
| BG001 | Sham Control | Sham control group receives sham neurofeedback from a large control brain region. real-time fMRI neurofeedback training running on Turbo Brain voyager (TBV) 3.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands) |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Neural Activity of Anterior Insula During Neorofeedback Training | Neural activity was analyzed using standard fMRI analysis procedure that examine neural activity during training of anterior insula regulation. The measures include BOLD signal analysis (reflecting neural activity strengths) as well as functional connectivity analysis (that examine the interaction between different brain regions). | From the initial population of 37 participants 5 had to be excluded because of high head movement during fMRI acquisition. This is a standard procedure in fMRI studies given that the analysis is very susceptible to movement artifacts. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | percentage of BOLD signal change | three days. |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Pain Empathy Rating Scores | Subjects were required to rate their empathic feeling towards painful pictures on a Likert Scale ranging from 1-9 (1 = not at all and 9 = very painful). The effects of training on the empathy for pain were analyzed comparing the feedback group with the controls group. For each subject differences were calculated between pictures that were preceded by a training compared to a no-training block. Within the context of the present design we expected that training-induced increases in anterior insula activity should lead to higher pain empathy ratings in the training group as compared to the control group. | From the initial population of 37 participants 5 had to be excluded because of high head movement during fMRI acquisition. This is a standard procedure in fMRI studies given that the analysis is very susceptible to movement artifacts. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | three days. |
|
three days - subjects were required to come back to the lab after two days.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Neurofeedback Training | Subjects in this group received fMRI-based feedback from their insula activity | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | ||
| EG001 | Sham Control | Subjects in this group received fMRI-based feedback from a unspecific control region | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Keith Kendrick | UESTC | +86028-61830811 | k.kendrick.uestc@gmail.com |
| Male |
|
|
|