Precision Dosing Versus Conventional Dosing of Infliximab Maintenance Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study in Patients With IBD in Clinical Remission
Precision Dosing Versus Conventional Dosing of Infliximab Maintenance Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study in Patients With IBD in Clinical Remission
Infliximab (IFX) is highly effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a large proportion of patients will eventually lose response to IFX. Therefore, strategies to improve the outcome of maintenance treatment with IFX are required. Retrospective analyses suggest that adjusting IFX treatment in order to achieve IFX trough levels (TL) above a well-defined therapeutic threshold will improve the outcome of IFX treatment.
Aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of "precision dosing" IFX maintenance treatment in comparison with standard IFX maintenance treatment in IBD patients in clinical remission.
This study will be an open, randomized, controlled trial. Inclusion criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) based on endoscopy and pathology, receiving scheduled IFX therapy for ≥14 weeks, in clinical remission based on a Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) score ≤4 or a Partial Mayo (PM) score ≤2, for CD and UC, respectively. Exclusion criteria: Dilatation or resectional surgury in the past year and patients with a stoma/pouch.
Patients in the intervention arm will receive individualized treatment with variable IFX dosing AND/OR intervals guided by a Bayesian pharmacokinetic model, aiming to achieve an IFX TL of 3 µg/ml. Patients in the control group will continue to receive the same IFX treatment regimen that was given prior to inclusion without dose adaptation. In the control group, treatment adjustments will only be made in case of signs of active disease, in accordance to current routine care but these patients will be considered as failures to their treatment.
Primary endpoint: Proportion of patients with sustained clinical remission (based on HBI or PM). Secondary endpoints include: annual costs of IFX treatment per patient, total annual medical costs, side effects, (sustained) biochemical remission, adverse events, quality of life, IFX trough level and IFX antibodies (with an assay allowing presence of drug).
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation will result in additional blood sampling, since IFX serum concentration will be measured every 8 weeks. All other laboratory tests can be considered as routine care. Patients in the intervention group with IFX TLs >3 will receive treatment de-escalation (interval elongation and/or dose reduction) as indicated by the Baysian model. Current evidence indicates that an IFX TL of 3 suffices. Patients in the intervention group with TLs <3 will receive treatment escalation (interval shortening and/or dose increase). We hypothesize that this will result in a higher chance of remaining in clinical remission.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dilatation or resectional surgery because of stenotic IBD in the past year