Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Roderick MacDonald Research Fund at Baylor St. Luke's | UNKNOWN |
| Kelsey Research Foundation | OTHER |
| Texas Gulf Coast Digestive Diseases Center | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of the study is to investigate the safety of a frozen or lyophilized inoculum administered, respectively, by retention enema or capsules in patients with recurrent C. difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD).
This is a single center, randomized, parallel assignment, open label safety study conducted in subjects with RCDAD. Fifty subjects will be enrolled in the study and randomized at 1:1 ratio to receive frozen filtered intestinal bacteria via retention enema or lyophilized donor intestinal bacteria. All subjects will be followed for a total of 3 years after study completion.
Donors will be enrolled and screened at the laboratory in the Center for Infectious Diseases at University of Texas School of Public Health (UT-SPH). The donors will come from a variety of places, including the UT-SPH. At least 20 donors will be screened to recruit at least 15 qualified donors.
Recipients may self-refer but must have a physician who agrees to accept care of the patient following fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Subjects consenting to treatment at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center (BSLMC) and the UT-SPH must be willing to self-pay for the FMT in the amount of $1,500. There will be no insurance accepted. Subjects undergoing retention enema will be treated as outpatients at either at BSLMC, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, or at the Memorial Hermann in the Texas Medical Center. All subjects taking capsules with lyophilized intestinal bacteria will be seen at UT-SPH. Once the procedure is completed, the recipient's care will be returned to their physician. At least 75 recipients will be screened to recruit 50 qualified recipients.
The primary endpoint is to evaluate the safety of FMT by rectal or oral routes with secondary endpoint related to efficacy prevention of RCDAD. In order to monitor any health effects for safety, participants will be contacted pre- and 7, 14, 30 days, then monthly basis for the first 90 days after FMT and quarterly till 3 years after FMT. The following procedures will be completed: review recipient diary with the recipient to ensure that the following information is recorded correctly and a fresh stool sample will be collected from recipient, tested for C. difficile toxins and an aliquot (2mL) stored at -80C for microbiome analysis. Recipients will be contacted by phone for their diarrhea status on monthly basis till 90 days after FMT, then on quarterly basis till 3 years after FMT.
Clinical improvement is monitored by telephone/email and or E-mail up to 3 years after FMT. Minor clinical management of the subject with over the counter medication (e.g. loperamide, acetaminophen and Saccharomyces boulardii [probiotic]) will be performed in the case of mild diarrhea and abdominal pain.
All subjects will be followed up by phone the day after FMT to assess health status during week one. Study subjects will be monitored on approximately days 7, 14 and 30, monthly for the first 3 month and quarterly for 3 years after FMT, at which time the recipient diary will be reviewed with the recipient to review any adverse experience or medication taken since the medical history obtained at FMT.
Investigators should determine if any adverse experience or medication need to be further studied. Donor will be contacted and tested if it is necessary. All actions will be recorded on with medical condition, dates of adverse experience and medication taken, indication for new medication taken, and total daily dose.
Recipients should be instructed at FMT to contact the Investigator if they have any questions regarding adverse experience or the appropriateness of a medication after FMT.
The following definitions of terms are guided by the International Conference of Harmonization and US Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 312.32).
An adverse experience is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, of disease temporally associated with FMT procedure, whether or not considered related to the procedure, including, but not limited to:
Serious adverse experience is any adverse experience that:
Severity - The adverse experience will be documented on the appropriate page in the Patient Diary according to the following descriptors:
Relationship - the relationship of adverse experience to FMT will be assigned by the Investigator according to the following definitions:
Progression of underlying conditions as an adverse experience
If the progression of the underlying condition might be reasonably anticipated given the nature and severity of the underlying condition, then the progression of the underlying condition per se will not constitute an adverse experience. However, if the progression of the underlying condition is fatal, then the progression of the underlying condition should be reported as an adverse experience.
Recording and documenting adverse experience
The Investigator must completely and promptly record each new adverse experience and serious adverse experience, even if the relationship of adverse experience to the procedure is assessed by the Investigator to be "unlikely" or "not related". In addition, the investigator must document and follow serious adverse experiences that occur from the procedure through 3 years after the FMT. The Investigator should attempt, if possible, to establish a diagnosis based on the presenting signs and symptoms. If an adverse experience meets the definition of a serious adverse experience then the Investigator must also complete the serious adverse experience, and also send any supporting source documents directly to the University of Texas Health Science Center IRB as soon as the event is discovered. At each visit, after the patient has had an opportunity to mention any problems spontaneously, the Investigator (or designee) will inquire about adverse experience by asking the standard questions listed in, such as:
Investigator reporting of serious adverse experience All serious adverse experience must be reported to the University of Texas Health Science IRB using the serious adverse experience facsimile or email or by telephone/email as soon as the serious adverse experience is discovered, and within 24 hours after the Investigator recognizes or classifies the event as a serious adverse experience. A brief description of the event must be provided at the time of the initial serious adverse experience report. The initial serious adverse experience report should be followed up by additional information using the serious adverse experience within 48 hours. The reports should identify the patient by their unique patient number instead of names. The completed serious adverse experience Form will be used by the investigators in regulatory filings. The investigator is responsible for continuing to report to the University of Texas Health Science IRB any new or relevant follow-up information obtained concerning the serious adverse experience. The results of any additional assessments conducted must be also reported to the University of Texas Health Science IRB.
Notification of post-study serious adverse experience Investigators are not obligated to actively seek follow-up information for patients with adverse experience after the conclusion of the study (i.e., > 3 years after the FMT procedure). However, if the investigator becomes aware of an adverse experience that occurs after the patient completes and the adverse experience is considered by the Investigator to be at least possibly related to study procedure, the investigator must notify the University of Texas Health Science Center IRB.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frozen Microbiota | Active Comparator | Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was kept at -80C labeled with ID and expiration date which was 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema |
|
| Lyophilized Microbiota | Active Comparator | Lyophilized Microbiota_Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was starting lyophilization process within 30 minutes after completion of stool filtration. Lyophilized microbiota products were kept at 4C and were used within 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frozen Microbiota | Biological | Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema route. |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety as Assessed by Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE)s | any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of PRIM-DJ2727 whether or not considered drug related is considered as an adverse event (AE) | 6 months after the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Continue to Have Diarrhea and C. Difficile Toxin Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation From a Healthy Donor | diarrhea was defined as more than 3 episodes of loose/watery stools in 2 consecutive days | 60 days after the procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Herbert l DuPont, MD | University of Texas School of Public Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Texas Health Science Center at Housotn | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18971494 | Background | Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1932-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707500. No abstract available. | |
| 19171246 | Background | Gravel D, Gardam M, Taylor G, Miller M, Simor A, McGeer A, Hutchinson J, Moore D, Kelly S, Mulvey M; Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program. Infection control practices related to Clostridium difficile infection in acute care hospitals in Canada. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Feb;37(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.07.012. |
Not provided
Not provided
One patient who enrolled never started treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Frozen Microbiota | Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was kept at -80C labeled with ID and expiration date which was 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema Frozen Microbiota: Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema route. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 13, 2017 |
Not provided
Allocation: Randomized Endpoints: Safety, preliminary efficacy in preventing future bouts of CDAD and improvement in intestinal flora diversity Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment
Not provided
Not provided
frozen intestinal bacteria from a healthy donor given by retention enema or lyophilized intestinal bacteria given orally in capsules for therapy in subjects with recurrent C. difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD)
| Lyophilized Microbiota |
| Biological |
Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally. |
|
| 18199029 | Background | Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A, Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, Young VB. Decreased diversity of the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):435-8. doi: 10.1086/525047. |
| 2566734 | Background | Tvede M, Rask-Madsen J. Bacteriotherapy for chronic relapsing Clostridium difficile diarrhoea in six patients. Lancet. 1989 May 27;1(8648):1156-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92749-9. |
| 20048681 | Background | Khoruts A, Dicksved J, Jansson JK, Sadowsky MJ. Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 May-Jun;44(5):354-60. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181c87e02. |
| 20463588 | Background | Yoon SS, Brandt LJ. Treatment of refractory/recurrent C. difficile-associated disease by donated stool transplanted via colonoscopy: a case series of 12 patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44(8):562-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181dac035. |
| 20117243 | Background | Silverman MS, Davis I, Pillai DR. Success of self-administered home fecal transplantation for chronic Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 May;8(5):471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Feb 1. |
| 23542332 | Background | Dupont HL. Diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1216-23; quiz e73. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 28. |
| 23223589 | Background | Jiang ZD, Hoang LN, Lasco TM, Garey KW, Dupont HL. Physician attitudes toward the use of fecal transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in a metropolitan area. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;56(7):1059-60. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis1025. Epub 2012 Dec 7. No abstract available. |
| 30388112 | Derived | Jiang ZD, Jenq RR, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Alexander AA, Ke S, Iqbal T, DuPont AW, Muldrew K, Shi Y, Peterson C, Do KA, DuPont HL. Safety and preliminary efficacy of orally administered lyophilized fecal microbiota product compared with frozen product given by enema for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0205064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064. eCollection 2018. |
| FG001 | Lyophilized Microbiota | Lyophilized Microbiota_Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was starting lyophilization process within 30 minutes after completion of stool filtration. Lyophilized microbiota products were kept at 4C and were used within 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally Lyophilized Microbiota: Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Frozen Microbiota | Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was kept at -80C labeled with ID and expiration date which was 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema Frozen Microbiota: Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema route. |
| BG001 | Lyophilized Microbiota | Lyophilized Microbiota_Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was starting lyophilization process within 30 minutes after completion of stool filtration. Lyophilized microbiota products were kept at 4C and were used within 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally Lyophilized Microbiota: Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Patients with IBD comorbidity | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Safety as Assessed by Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE)s | any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of PRIM-DJ2727 whether or not considered drug related is considered as an adverse event (AE) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months after the procedure |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Continue to Have Diarrhea and C. Difficile Toxin Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation From a Healthy Donor | diarrhea was defined as more than 3 episodes of loose/watery stools in 2 consecutive days | subjects had more than 3 episodes of C. difficile infection and were treated with FMT | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 60 days after the procedure |
|
6 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Frozen Microbiota | Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was kept at -80C labeled with ID and expiration date which was 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema Frozen Microbiota: Frozen Microbiota will be delivered via enema route. | 1 | 36 | 4 | 36 | 5 | 36 |
| EG001 | Lyophilized Microbiota | Lyophilized Microbiota_Donor stool (greater than 150 grams) was collected <4 hours prior to the procedure and then mixed in a homogenizer with 750mL, 1:5 dilution sterilized 0.9% NaCl in a large sterilized suction canister until a smooth consistency was reached. The suspension was filtered using a coffee filter twice. The microbiota suspension (750mL) was starting lyophilization process within 30 minutes after completion of stool filtration. Lyophilized microbiota products were kept at 4C and were used within 6 months after preparation. Intervention - Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally Lyophilized Microbiota: Lyophilized Microbiota will be delivered orally. | 2 | 32 | 3 | 32 | 4 | 32 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brain hematoma | Nervous system disorders | patient report | Non-systematic Assessment | subject was 97 years old, fell at home and hospitalized for brain hematoma |
|
| urine track infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | bladder infection |
| |
| Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | 5 months after the procedure subject was hospitalized for COPD and emphysema |
| |
| Stoke | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | subject was hospitalized 14 days after the procedure |
| |
| pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | subject had previous history of pneumonia and was hospitalized with bilateral pneumonia 16 days after the procedure. |
| |
| Gastrointestinal related symptoms | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, fever |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gastrointestinal complaints | Gastrointestinal disorders | patient report | Non-systematic Assessment | diarrhea, bowel pattern change |
|
| headache | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| outpatient surgey for fracture | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bladder Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| breathing difficulty | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
The study would have been improved by increasing the sample size to allow us to randomize subjects to three groups. In addition, while we assume that both procedures preserved spore-forming Clostridia, no spore counts were performed in this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Herbert DuPont | University of Texas School of Public Health | 713 500 9366 | herbert.l.dupont@uth.tmc.edu |
| Mar 21, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|