Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Controlled study of stereotactic, intracranial injection of SB623 cells in patients with fixed motor deficits from ischemic stroke
This is a double-blind, sham-surgery controlled study of stereotactic, intracranial injection of SB623 cells in patients with fixed motor deficits from ischemic stroke. The study will be conducted at approximately 65 sites in the United States.
Two cohorts, Group 1 (2.5 and 5 million SB623 cells combined) and Group 2 (sham placebo), will be included in this study. Subjects who are randomized into this study will receive either 2.5 million SB623 cells, 5 million SB623 cells or sham surgery at a 1:1:1 randomization ratio. Randomization will be performed via an interactive web/voice response system (IXRS), stratified by Screening mRS score (recorded in the IXRS at the clinical site).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB623 Implant (2.5M) | Experimental | 2.5 million SB623 cells |
|
| SB623 Implant (5.0M) | Experimental | 5 million SB623 cells |
|
| Sham Control | Sham Comparator | Sham surgery |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SB623 Implant (2.5M) | Biological | 2.5 million SB623 cells |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Subjects Whose Fugl-Meyer Motor Total Score (FMMS) Improved by ≥ 10 Points at Month 6 From Baseline | The FMMS is used as a clinical measure of body function impairment after stroke that assesses several dimensions of motor impairment, including range of motion in both upper and lower limbs, reflex activity, volitional movement, and co-ordination. The FMMS motor component consists of the 33-item upper extremity subscale (UE-FMMS) and the 17-item lower extremity subscale (LE-FMMS). Items were scored on a 3-point ordinal scale: 0= cannot perform; 1= partial motion; 2= full motion Individual items were then summed to determine scores for the 2 subscale scores, as well as a motor total score (total of all item scores including the 2 subscales UE-FMMS and LE-FMMS). As a result, the UE-FMMS subscale score ranged from 0 to 66 and the LE-FMMS subscale score ranged from 0 to 34. The FMMS motor total score ranged from 0 (hemiplegia) to a maximum of 100 points (normal motor performance). Responders: subjects whose FMMS motor total score improve by ≥10 points at Month 6 from Baseline | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Rankin Scale Response: The Proportion of Subjects That Improved at Least One Point on the mRS From Baseline | Responders: The subjects that improved at least one point on the mRS from Baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS): This scale is used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who had suffered a stroke. The mRS is an ordinal scale from 0 (no symptoms at all) to 5 (severe disability; requiring constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent) with a sixth category of death. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Additional Analysis (MMRM), Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FMMS) | An additional analysis using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was performed treating the change from Baseline in FMMS total score as a continuous outcome (dependent) variable. The independent variables were treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and pooled surgical site as effects, and Baseline FMMS total score and Baseline mRS score as covariates. Least-squares means (LS-mean) with SE was calculated for the change from baseline measurements. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gary Steinberg, MD, PhD | Stanford Hospital and Clinics, School of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham (Surgical/Assessment) | Birmingham | Alabama | 35233 | United States | ||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | SB623 Implant (2.5M) | 2.5 million SB623 cells SB623 Implant (2.5M): 2.5 million SB623 cells |
| FG001 | SB623 Implant (5.0M) | 5 million SB623 cells SB623 Implant (5.0M): 5 million SB623 cells |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 5, 2017 | Dec 20, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SB623 Implant (5.0M) |
| Biological |
5 million SB623 cells |
|
| Sham surgery | Procedure |
|
| 6 months |
| The Proportion of Subjects That Improved at Least 6 Points From Baseline on the ARAT Total Score at the Affected Side | Responders: The subjects that improved at least 6 points from Baseline on the ARAT total score at the affected side. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): The test was scored for left and right side separately. Performance on each item was rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3 (performed test normally in less than 5 seconds); 2 (completed test, but took abnormally long or had great difficult, with time varying from 5 to 60 seconds; 1 (performed test partially); 0 (could perform no part of the test). The ARAT is a 19-item measure divided into 4 subtests: Grasp subscale (with 6 items and a score range of 0 to 18); Grip subscale with 4 items and a score range of 0 to 12); Pinch subscale with 6 items and a score range of 0 to 18); Gross arm movement subscale (with 3 items and a score range of 0 to 9). The maximum score on the ARAT is 57 points (possible range 0 to 57) for each side. | 6 months |
| The Proportion of Subjects That Improved at Least 1 Functional Level From Baseline on Gait Velocity | Responders: The subjects that improved at least 1 functional level (eg, from < 0.4 m/s to 0.4-0.8 m/s or from 0.4-0.8 m/s to > 0.8 m/s) from Baseline on Gait Velocity. Gait Velocity was measured on a standard 10 meter walk. Two trials were tested and the average result from both was used for analysis | 6 months |
| Neurological Quality of Life Response: T-scores of the Change From Baseline in the 2 Sub-domains (Upper Extremity Function and Lower Extremity Function) | The Neurological Quality of Life (NeuroQOL) was used as a measure of change in the levels of Quality of Life, Satisfaction and Participation, secondary to improvements in the subject's upper and lower extremity motor function. NeuroQOL is summation of item scores for upper extremity (8 terms: score 8 - 40) and lower extremity (8 items: score 8 - 40) separately. The item scores are on a 1 to 5 scale (1 = unable to do; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = with some difficulty; 4 = with little difficulty; 5 = without any difficulty). The result provided here shows NeuroQOL score converted to T-score. The range for Upper extremity T-score and Lower extremity T-score are 12.8 to 53.8 and 16.5 to 58.6 respectively. | 6 Months |
| Global Rating of Perceived Change (GRPC): The Proportion of Subjects Scoring Either 7 or 6 on the Global Rating of Perceived Change by Both Subject and Clinician | Responders: Participants who scored either 7 [much better] or 6 [a little better, meaningful]) Global Rating of Perceived Change from Baseline: Subjects and Clinicians were asked about perceived changes in their motor function by comparing "how well they are doing compared to before the surgical procedure". The Subject Global Rating of Perceived Change was completed by the subject (or by the caregiver using the subject's answers). The following 7-point Likert scale was used: Score 7 (much better); Score 6 (a little better, meaningful); Score 5 (a little better, not meaningful); Score 4 (about the same); Score 3 (a little worse, not meaningful); Score 2 (a little worse, meaningful); Score 1 (much worse) | 6 Months (LOCF) |
| 6 Months |
| Proportion of Subjects Whose FMMS Motor Total Score Improve by ≥10 Points at Month 6 From Baseline (Per Protocol Population) | Responders: subjects whose FMMS motor total score improve by ≥10 points at Month 6 from Baseline | Month 6 |
| University of Alabama at Birmingham |
| Birmingham |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Xenoscience, Inc. (Assessment) | Phoenix | Arizona | 85004 | United States |
| The Research Center of Southern California (Assessment) | Carlsbad | California | 92011 | United States |
| Rancho Los Amigos National Rehab Center | Downey | California | 90242 | United States |
| Neuro-Pain Medical Center (Assessment) | Fresno | California | 93710 | United States |
| Neuro Pain Medical Center | Fresno | California | 95710 | United States |
| University of California Irvine | Irvine | California | United States |
| Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center (Assessment/Surgical) | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States |
| UCLA Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| University of California Irvine (Assessment) | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| Westview Clinical Research (Assessment) | Placentia | California | 92870 | United States |
| Providence Saint John's Health Center (Assessment) | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| Providence St. John's Health Center (Surgical) | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| Providence St. Johns Health Center | Santa Monica | California | United States |
| Stanford Health Care (Surgical/Assessment) | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| New England Institute for Clinical Research (Assessment) | Stamford | Connecticut | 06905 | United States |
| MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (Assessment) | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| University of Miami Miller School of Medicine (Assessment/Surgical) | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| University of Miami Jackson Memorial Hospital | Miami | Florida | United States |
| NeuroMedical Research Institute (Assessment) | Panama City | Florida | 32405 | United States |
| Medsol Clinical Research Center (Assessment) | Port Charlotte | Florida | 33952 | United States |
| Neurostudies, Inc. (Assessment) | Port Charlotte | Florida | 33952 | United States |
| University of South Florida (Assessment) | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Grady Memorial Hospital (Assessment) | Atlanta | Georgia | 30303 | United States |
| Emory University Hospital (Surgical) | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Center for Advanced Research and Education (Assessment) | Gainesville | Georgia | 30501 | United States |
| Northwestern Memorial Hospital (Surgical) | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| University of Chicago Medical Center (Assessment) | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| University of Chicago Medical Center (Surgical) | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | United States |
| Consultants in Neurology, Ltd. (Assessment) | Northbrook | Illinois | 60062 | United States |
| OSF Saint Francis Healthcare System (Assessment) | Peoria | Illinois | 61637 | United States |
| Indiana Medical Research, Elkhart Clinic (Assessment) | Elkhart | Indiana | 46514 | United States |
| University of Kansas Medical Center (Surgical) | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| Kansas Institute of Research (Assessment) | Overland Park | Kansas | 66211 | United States |
| University of Kentucky Hospital (Surgical) | Lexington | Kentucky | 40536 | United States |
| University of Louisville Clinical Trials Unit (Assessment) | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| NeuroMedical Clinic of Central Louisiana (Assessment) | Alexandria | Louisiana | 71301 | United States |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Surgical) | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| Wayne State University (Assessment) | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States |
| Henry Ford Health System (Assessment) | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | United States |
| Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (Assessment) | Newark | New Jersey | 07013 | United States |
| New York University Langone Medical Center (Surgical/Assessment) | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| NYU Langone Medical Center | New York | New York | United States |
| The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital (Assessment) | White Plains | New York | 10605 | United States |
| Carolinas Rehabilitation (Assessment) | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28203 | United States |
| Neurology and Neuroscience Associates, Inc. (Assessment) | Akron | Ohio | 44320 | United States |
| Neurology and Neuroscience Associates | Akron | Ohio | 44320 | United States |
| University Hospital Case Medical Center (Surgical) | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| University of Toledo Medical Center (Assessment) | Toledo | Ohio | 43614 | United States |
| Moss Rehab (Assessment) | Elkins Park | Pennsylvania | 19006 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (Assessment) | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Pennsylvania Hospital (Surgical) | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19106 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University Comprehensive Stroke Center (Assessment) | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Pennsylvania Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Surgical/Assessment)) | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Abington Neurological Associates (Assessment) | Willow Grove | Pennsylvania | 19090 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina (Surgical) | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Chattanooga Center for Neurologic Research (Assessment) | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37403 | United States |
| University of Texas Medical School | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Assessment/Surgical) | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| West Virginia University Hospitals (Assessment) | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506 | United States |
| West Virginia University | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506 | United States |
| FG002 | Sham Control | Control Group: Sham surgery |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | SB623 Implant (2.5M) | 2.5 million SB623 cells |
| BG001 | SB623 Implant (5.0M) | 5 million SB623 cells |
| BG002 | Sham Control | Control Group: Sham surgery |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Subjects Whose Fugl-Meyer Motor Total Score (FMMS) Improved by ≥ 10 Points at Month 6 From Baseline | The FMMS is used as a clinical measure of body function impairment after stroke that assesses several dimensions of motor impairment, including range of motion in both upper and lower limbs, reflex activity, volitional movement, and co-ordination. The FMMS motor component consists of the 33-item upper extremity subscale (UE-FMMS) and the 17-item lower extremity subscale (LE-FMMS). Items were scored on a 3-point ordinal scale: 0= cannot perform; 1= partial motion; 2= full motion Individual items were then summed to determine scores for the 2 subscale scores, as well as a motor total score (total of all item scores including the 2 subscales UE-FMMS and LE-FMMS). As a result, the UE-FMMS subscale score ranged from 0 to 66 and the LE-FMMS subscale score ranged from 0 to 34. The FMMS motor total score ranged from 0 (hemiplegia) to a maximum of 100 points (normal motor performance). Responders: subjects whose FMMS motor total score improve by ≥10 points at Month 6 from Baseline | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Modified Rankin Scale Response: The Proportion of Subjects That Improved at Least One Point on the mRS From Baseline | Responders: The subjects that improved at least one point on the mRS from Baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS): This scale is used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who had suffered a stroke. The mRS is an ordinal scale from 0 (no symptoms at all) to 5 (severe disability; requiring constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent) with a sixth category of death. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Proportion of Subjects That Improved at Least 6 Points From Baseline on the ARAT Total Score at the Affected Side | Responders: The subjects that improved at least 6 points from Baseline on the ARAT total score at the affected side. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): The test was scored for left and right side separately. Performance on each item was rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3 (performed test normally in less than 5 seconds); 2 (completed test, but took abnormally long or had great difficult, with time varying from 5 to 60 seconds; 1 (performed test partially); 0 (could perform no part of the test). The ARAT is a 19-item measure divided into 4 subtests: Grasp subscale (with 6 items and a score range of 0 to 18); Grip subscale with 4 items and a score range of 0 to 12); Pinch subscale with 6 items and a score range of 0 to 18); Gross arm movement subscale (with 3 items and a score range of 0 to 9). The maximum score on the ARAT is 57 points (possible range 0 to 57) for each side. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Proportion of Subjects That Improved at Least 1 Functional Level From Baseline on Gait Velocity | Responders: The subjects that improved at least 1 functional level (eg, from < 0.4 m/s to 0.4-0.8 m/s or from 0.4-0.8 m/s to > 0.8 m/s) from Baseline on Gait Velocity. Gait Velocity was measured on a standard 10 meter walk. Two trials were tested and the average result from both was used for analysis | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Neurological Quality of Life Response: T-scores of the Change From Baseline in the 2 Sub-domains (Upper Extremity Function and Lower Extremity Function) | The Neurological Quality of Life (NeuroQOL) was used as a measure of change in the levels of Quality of Life, Satisfaction and Participation, secondary to improvements in the subject's upper and lower extremity motor function. NeuroQOL is summation of item scores for upper extremity (8 terms: score 8 - 40) and lower extremity (8 items: score 8 - 40) separately. The item scores are on a 1 to 5 scale (1 = unable to do; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = with some difficulty; 4 = with little difficulty; 5 = without any difficulty). The result provided here shows NeuroQOL score converted to T-score. The range for Upper extremity T-score and Lower extremity T-score are 12.8 to 53.8 and 16.5 to 58.6 respectively. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Change in score on a scale from baseline | 6 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Global Rating of Perceived Change (GRPC): The Proportion of Subjects Scoring Either 7 or 6 on the Global Rating of Perceived Change by Both Subject and Clinician | Responders: Participants who scored either 7 [much better] or 6 [a little better, meaningful]) Global Rating of Perceived Change from Baseline: Subjects and Clinicians were asked about perceived changes in their motor function by comparing "how well they are doing compared to before the surgical procedure". The Subject Global Rating of Perceived Change was completed by the subject (or by the caregiver using the subject's answers). The following 7-point Likert scale was used: Score 7 (much better); Score 6 (a little better, meaningful); Score 5 (a little better, not meaningful); Score 4 (about the same); Score 3 (a little worse, not meaningful); Score 2 (a little worse, meaningful); Score 1 (much worse) | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 Months (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Additional Analysis (MMRM), Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FMMS) | An additional analysis using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was performed treating the change from Baseline in FMMS total score as a continuous outcome (dependent) variable. The independent variables were treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and pooled surgical site as effects, and Baseline FMMS total score and Baseline mRS score as covariates. Least-squares means (LS-mean) with SE was calculated for the change from baseline measurements. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: Included all randomized subjects who completed the surgery treatment procedure. A total of 111 subjects received treatment with SB623; 55 subjects were randomized to receive 2.5 million SB623 cells and 56 subjects to receive 5 million SB623 cells. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Change in score on a scale from baseline | 6 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Proportion of Subjects Whose FMMS Motor Total Score Improve by ≥10 Points at Month 6 From Baseline (Per Protocol Population) | Responders: subjects whose FMMS motor total score improve by ≥10 points at Month 6 from Baseline | Per Protocol (PP) Population: The PP population included all subjects in the mITT population who did not have important protocol deviations. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Month 6 |
|
|
Safety was monitored throughout the study. The adverse event reporting period for this trial began upon informed consent and ended 12 months after the administration of SB623, or at Early Termination. Also, an external Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was utilized to review safety data, including clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, and MRI brain imaging. The DSMB reviewed study data within one month of the enrollment of subjects at the 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total population.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | SB623 Implant (2.5M) | 2.5 million SB623 cells SB623 Implant (2.5M): 2.5 million SB623 cells | 0 | 55 | 15 | 55 | 52 | 55 |
| EG001 | SB623 Implant (5.0M) | 5 million SB623 cells SB623 Implant (5.0M): 5 million SB623 cells | 1 | 56 | 15 | 56 | 53 | 56 |
| EG002 | Sham Control | Control Group: Sham surgery Group | 0 | 52 | 10 | 52 | 51 | 52 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haemorrhagic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Leukocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyrexia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Asthenia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pancreas infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bronchopneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intervertebral discitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Staphylococcal osteomyelitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Subdural haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Subdural haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Crush injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Incision site complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumocephalus | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anti factor X antibody positive | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Muscle haemorrhage | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rhabdomyolysis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bladder cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Basal ganglia haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Generalised tonic-clonic seizure | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Seizure like phenomena | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye swelling | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyrexia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Procedural headache | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Incision site pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin abrasion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Swelling face | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijan Nejadnik M.D.; Chief Medical Officer | SanBio, Inc. | 650-625-2205 | Bijan.Nejadnik@sanbio.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 21, 2018 | Dec 20, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000083242 | Ischemic Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| Other |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Unknown |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
5 million SB623 cells
| OG002 | Sham Control | Sham surgery Group (Control) |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG002 | Sham Surgery | Sham surgery: Control Group |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Sham Control | Sham surgery Sham surgery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unknown |
|