Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-001942-28 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for ulcerative colitis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etrasimod Low Dose | Experimental | Oral, low dose, daily for 12 Weeks |
|
| Etrasimod High Dose | Experimental | Oral, high dose, daily for 12 weeks |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Oral, placebo, daily for 12 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etrasimod | Drug |
|
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Adapted Mayo Score (MCS) at Week 12 | The adapted MCS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and findings of endoscopy), each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The adapted MCS was calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores, and the overall score values ranged from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 | For determination of the endoscopic subscore of the MCS, a flexible proctosigmoidoscopy, performed with a videoendoscope following a cleansing prep (oral or rectal cathartic) was performed at screening (within 10 days prior to administration of the first dose of study drug) and the Week 12 visit. This efficacy procedure assessed endoscopic mucosal appearance. The results were rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. Endoscopic improvement was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (using findings of flexible proctosigmoidoscopy) of ≤1 point. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Trichotomous Composite Score of Clinical Remission and Clinical Response at Week 12 | The trichotomous composite score of clinical remission and clinical response at Week 12 is an ordinal categorical endpoint with 3 categories (score ranging 0 to 2: score 2 for achieving both clinical remission and clinical response; 1 for only achieving clinical response, and 0 for achieving neither). Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arena CT.gov Administrator | Arena Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena 1119 | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States | ||
| Arena 1133 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39778975 | Derived | Vermeire S, Rubin DT, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Dubinsky MC, Regueiro M, Irving PM, Goetsch M, Lazin K, Gu G, Wu J, Modesto I, McDonnell A, Guo X, Green J, Dalam AB, Yarur AJ. Cardiovascular events observed among patients in the etrasimod clinical programme: an integrated safety analysis of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 8;12(1):e001516. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001516. | |
| 39526078 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
During the screening period (Days -28 to -1), participants were evaluated for study entry based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening procedures to evaluate participant eligibility for the study were to be conducted within 28 days prior to study drug administration on Day 1.
The study included a screening period (up to 28 days), a double-blind induction treatment period (12 weeks), and a possible follow-up visit (2 weeks after the last study visit). The target population consisted of male or female participants aged between 18 and 80 years (inclusive), with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Etrasimod 1 mg | Etrasimod 1 mg was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. The study drug was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
| FG001 | Etrasimod 2 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 3, 2017 | Feb 12, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Drug |
|
| Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in 2-component MCS at Week 12 | The 2-component MCS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 2 subscores (rectal bleeding and findings on endoscopy), each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The 2-component MCS was calculated as the sum of the 2 subscores, and the overall score value ranged from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score (TMS) at Week 12 | The TMS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 4 subscores [stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of endoscopy (flexible proctosigmoidoscopy), and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score], each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The TMS was calculated as the sum of the 4 subscores, and the overall score values ranged from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12 | A participant was considered to have achieved clinical remission if he/she had: 1) an endoscopy score using flexible proctosigmoidoscopy of 0 or 1 (excluding friability), 2) a rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1, and 3) a stool frequency score of 0 or 1 with a decrease of ≥1 point from baseline. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12 | A participant was considered to have achieved clinical response if he/she met the criteria of clinical remission defined above, or met criteria of clinical response. Clinical response was defined as a decrease in the adapted MCS of ≥ 2 points and a decrease of ≥ 30% with either a decrease of rectal bleeding of ≥ 1 or rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. | Week 12 |
| Dothan |
| Alabama |
| 36305 |
| United States |
| Arena 1143 | Thousand Oaks | California | 91360 | United States |
| Arena 1107 | Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| Arena 1138 | Miami | Florida | 33134 | United States |
| Arena 1123 | Naples | Florida | 34102 | United States |
| Arena 1141 | Orlando | Florida | 32825 | United States |
| Arena 1106 | Port Orange | Florida | 32127 | United States |
| Arena 1137 | Sweetwater | Florida | 33172 | United States |
| Arena 1131 | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Arena 1139 | Hoffman Estates | Illinois | 60169 | United States |
| Arena 1127 | Urbana | Illinois | 61801 | United States |
| Arena 1142 | Traverse City | Michigan | 49686 | United States |
| Arena 1111 | Troy | Michigan | 48098 | United States |
| Arena 1109 | Great Neck | New York | 11021 | United States |
| Arena 1114 | Rochester | New York | 14642 | United States |
| Arena 1118 | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27612 | United States |
| Arena 1112 | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45267 | United States |
| Arena 1117 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15219 | United States |
| Arena 1105 | Germantown | Tennessee | 38138 | United States |
| Arena 1102 | Hermitage | Tennessee | 37076 | United States |
| Arena 1136 | DeSoto | Texas | 75115 | United States |
| Arena 1121 | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Arena 1116 | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| Arena 1103 | Ogden | Utah | 84405 | United States |
| Arena 1130 | Richmond | Virginia | 23298 | United States |
| Arena 1128 | Roanoke | Virginia | 24014 | United States |
| Arena 1115 | Seattle | Washington | 98101 | United States |
| Arena 1101 | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| Arena 1108 | Wauwatosa | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Arena 1604 | Kingswood | 2747 | Australia |
| Arena 1605 | Randwick | 2031 | Australia |
| Arena 1607 | Subiaco | 6008 | Australia |
| Arena 1490 | Vienna | 1090 | Austria |
| Arena 1472 | Edegem | 2650 | Belgium |
| Arena 1464 | Kortrijk | 8500 | Belgium |
| Arena 1473 | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| Arena 1421 | Rousse | 7002 | Bulgaria |
| Arena 1409 | Sofia | 1407 | Bulgaria |
| Arena 1410 | Sofia | 1407 | Bulgaria |
| Arena 1417 | Sofia | 1407 | Bulgaria |
| Arena 1407 | Sofia | 1797 | Bulgaria |
| Arena 1425 | Varna | 9010 | Bulgaria |
| Arena 1202 | Winnipeg | Manitoba | R3A 1R9 | Canada |
| Arena 1210 | Bridgewater | Nova Scotia | B4V 3N2 | Canada |
| Arena 1208 | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | P3E 1H5 | Canada |
| Arena 1209 | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | P3E 6C3 | Canada |
| Arena 1206 | London | Ontario | N6A 4G5 | Canada |
| Arena 1204 | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 1X5 | Canada |
| Arena 1455 | Prague | 140 59 | Czechia |
| Arena 1443 | Amiens | 80054 | France |
| Arena 1418 | Clichy | 92110 | France |
| Arena 1437 | Lille | 59037 | France |
| Arena 1476 | Paris | 75010 | France |
| Arena 1480 | Pierre-Bénite | 693110 | France |
| Arena 1423 | Saint-Etienne | 42055 | France |
| Arena 1457 | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | 54511 | France |
| Arena 1479 | Hamburg | 20249 | Germany |
| Arena 1422 | Hamburg | Germany |
| Arena 1470 | Hanover | 30625 | Germany |
| Arena 1446 | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
| Arena 1489 | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
| Arena 1497 | Oldenburg | 26123 | Germany |
| Arena 1444 | Ulm | 89073 | Germany |
| Arena 1478 | Békéscsaba | 5600 | Hungary |
| Arena 1471 | Budapest | 1062 | Hungary |
| Arena 1492 | Budapest | 1062 | Hungary |
| Arena 1431 | Budapest | 1076 | Hungary |
| Arena 1505 | Debrecen | 4025 | Hungary |
| Arena 1474 | Debrecen | 4032 | Hungary |
| Arena 1477 | Szombathely | 9700 | Hungary |
| Arena 1705 | Beersheba | 84101 | Israel |
| Arena 1702 | Haifa | 31096 | Israel |
| Arena 1706 | Holon | 58100 | Israel |
| Arena 1704 | Jerusalem | 91031 | Israel |
| Arena 1703 | Petah Tikva | 49100 | Israel |
| Arena 1462 | Riga | 1002 | Latvia |
| Arena 1475 | Riga | 1006 | Latvia |
| Arena 1484 | Vilnius | 8661 | Lithuania |
| Arena 1601 | Christchurch | 8011 | New Zealand |
| Arena 1439 | Bydgoszcz | 85-681 | Poland |
| Arena 1486 | Elblag | 03-580 | Poland |
| Arena 1495 | Kielce | 25-364 | Poland |
| Arena 1451 | Krakow | 31-009 | Poland |
| Arena 1438 | Lodz | 90-302 | Poland |
| Arena 1458 | Poznan | 61-485 | Poland |
| Arena 1428 | Rzeszów | 35-068 | Poland |
| Arena 1456 | Sopot | 81-756 | Poland |
| Arena 1494 | Wroclaw | 54-144 | Poland |
| Arena 1441 | Bucharest | 050098 | Romania |
| Arena 1491 | Bucharest | 10719 | Romania |
| Arena 1406 | Bucharest | Romania |
| Arena 1436 | Iași | 700506 | Romania |
| Arena 1420 | Oradea | 410159 | Romania |
| Arena 1405 | Timișoara | 300002 | Romania |
| Arena 1493 | Timișoara | 300736 | Romania |
| Arena 1440 | Kazan' | 420029 | Russia |
| Arena 1500 | Krasnoyarsk | 660022 | Russia |
| Arena 1504 | Novosibirsk | 630091 | Russia |
| Arena 1419 | Rostov-on-Don | 197022 | Russia |
| Arena 1452 | Ryazan | 197022 | Russia |
| Arena 1498 | Saint Petersburg | 191015 | Russia |
| Arena 1467 | Saint Petersburg | 195257 | Russia |
| Arena 1448 | Saint Petersburg | 344007 | Russia |
| Arena 1447 | Saint Petersburg | 603126 | Russia |
| Arena 1465 | Samara | 111539 | Russia |
| Arena 1613 | Busan | 49241 | South Korea |
| Arena 1614 | Daegu | 42415 | South Korea |
| Arena 1610 | Incheon | 21565 | South Korea |
| Arena 1612 | Seoul | 05505 | South Korea |
| Arena 1611 | Seoul | 06519 | South Korea |
| Arena 1608 | Suwon | 16247 | South Korea |
| Arena 1615 | Wŏnju | 26426 | South Korea |
| Arena 1403 | Barcelona | 08022 | Spain |
| Arena 1460 | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Arena 1481 | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| Arena 1430 | Pontevedra | 36071 | Spain |
| Arena 1432 | Santiago de Compostela | 15706 | Spain |
| Arena 1469 | Seville | 41007 | Spain |
| Arena 1424 | Chernivtsi | 3110 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1445 | Ivano-Frankivsk | 07601 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1454 | Kharkiv | 6100 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1459 | Kharkiv | 61039 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1466 | Kiev | 01030 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1408 | Kyiv | 01030 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1502 | Kyiv | 01133 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1506 | Kyiv | 02091 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1414 | Odesa | 65025 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1433 | Uzhhorod | 88000 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1416 | Vinnytsia | 21018 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1501 | Vinnytsia | 21029 | Ukraine |
| Arena 1302 | London | E1 1BB | United Kingdom |
| Arena 1304 | Torquay | TQ2 7AA | United Kingdom |
| Arena 1303 | Wolverhampton | WV10 0QP | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Lees CW, Torres J, Leung Y, Vermeire S, Fellmann M, Modesto I, McDonnell A, Lazin K, Keating M, Goetsch M, Wu J, Loftus EV Jr. Non-serious adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving etrasimod: an analysis of the phase II OASIS and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 clinical trials. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 7;17:17562848241293643. doi: 10.1177/17562848241293643. eCollection 2024. |
| 38245818 | Derived | Yarur AJ, Chiorean MV, Panes J, Jairath V, Zhang J, Rabbat CJ, Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Achievement of Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histological Outcomes in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Etrasimod, and Association with Faecal Calprotectin and C-reactive Protein: Results From the Phase 2 OASIS Trial. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Jun 3;18(6):885-894. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae007. |
| 31711921 | Derived | Sandborn WJ, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Zhang J, Chiorean M, Vermeire S, Lee SD, Kuhbacher T, Yacyshyn B, Cabell CH, Naik SU, Klassen P, Panes J. Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Feb;158(3):550-561. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.035. Epub 2019 Nov 9. |
Etrasimod 2 mg was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. The study drug was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
| FG002 | Placebo | Placebo was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. Placebo was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The analysis was performed using the safety population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Etrasimod 1 mg | Etrasimod 1 mg was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. The study drug was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
| BG001 | Etrasimod 2 mg | Etrasimod 2 mg was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. The study drug was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
| BG002 | Placebo | Placebo was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. Placebo was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| ||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Number | Subjects |
| |||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| ||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| ||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| ||||||||||
| Adapted Mayo Score (MCS) | The adapted MCS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and findings of endoscopy), each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The adapted MCS was calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores, and the overall score values ranged from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. | The analysis was performed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One subject had missing data at baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
| ||||||||
| The 2-component MCS | The 2-component MCS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 2 subscores (rectal bleeding and findings on endoscopy), each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The 2-component MCS was calculated as the sum of the 2 subscores, and the overall score value ranged from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One subject had missing data at baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
| ||||||||
| Total Mayo Score (TMS) | The TMS consisted of 4 subscores [stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of endoscopy (flexible proctosigmoidoscopy), and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score], each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The TMS was calculated as the sum of the 4 subscores, and the overall score values ranged from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One subject had missing data at baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Adapted Mayo Score (MCS) at Week 12 | The adapted MCS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and findings of endoscopy), each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The adapted MCS was calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores, and the overall score values ranged from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | The analysis was performed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 90% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 | For determination of the endoscopic subscore of the MCS, a flexible proctosigmoidoscopy, performed with a videoendoscope following a cleansing prep (oral or rectal cathartic) was performed at screening (within 10 days prior to administration of the first dose of study drug) and the Week 12 visit. This efficacy procedure assessed endoscopic mucosal appearance. The results were rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. Endoscopic improvement was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (using findings of flexible proctosigmoidoscopy) of ≤1 point. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 2-component MCS at Week 12 | The 2-component MCS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 2 subscores (rectal bleeding and findings on endoscopy), each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The 2-component MCS was calculated as the sum of the 2 subscores, and the overall score value ranged from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 90% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score (TMS) at Week 12 | The TMS was used to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. It consisted of 4 subscores [stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of endoscopy (flexible proctosigmoidoscopy), and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score], each of which was rated on a scale from 0 to 3, indicating normal to severe. The TMS was calculated as the sum of the 4 subscores, and the overall score values ranged from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 90% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Trichotomous Composite Score of Clinical Remission and Clinical Response at Week 12 | The trichotomous composite score of clinical remission and clinical response at Week 12 is an ordinal categorical endpoint with 3 categories (score ranging 0 to 2: score 2 for achieving both clinical remission and clinical response; 1 for only achieving clinical response, and 0 for achieving neither). Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12 | A participant was considered to have achieved clinical remission if he/she had: 1) an endoscopy score using flexible proctosigmoidoscopy of 0 or 1 (excluding friability), 2) a rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1, and 3) a stool frequency score of 0 or 1 with a decrease of ≥1 point from baseline. Multiple imputation method was used to handle missing data. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12 | A participant was considered to have achieved clinical response if he/she met the criteria of clinical remission defined above, or met criteria of clinical response. Clinical response was defined as a decrease in the adapted MCS of ≥ 2 points and a decrease of ≥ 30% with either a decrease of rectal bleeding of ≥ 1 or rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. | The analysis was performed using the ITT population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
Up to approximately 16 weeks i.e. from the time of administration of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug.
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) were collected during the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Etrasimod 1 mg | Etrasimod 1 mg was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. The study drug was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. | 0 | 52 | 3 | 52 | 11 | 52 |
| EG001 | Etrasimod 2 mg | Etrasimod 2 mg was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. The study drug was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 11 | 50 |
| EG002 | Placebo | Placebo was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. Placebo was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. | 0 | 54 | 6 | 54 | 9 | 54 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena CT.gov Administrator | Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +1 855-218-9153 | ct.gov@arenapharm.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 27, 2018 | Feb 12, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003093 | Colitis, Ulcerative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003092 | Colitis |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000656249 | etrasimod |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| From 65-80 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | The analysis compared the adapted MCS change from baseline between treatment groups using a 1-sided test at the 0.05 level of significance. | = 0.1457 | The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model that incorporated treatment, current oral corticosteroid use, prior exposure to TNFα antagonists, and baseline value as covariate. | Difference in least square mean | -0.43 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.41 | 2-Sided | 90 | -1.11 | 0.24 | Estimated least square mean difference in etrasimod 1 mg from placebo | Superiority |
| OG002 | Placebo | Placebo was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. Placebo was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
|
|
|
Placebo was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. Placebo was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
|
|
|
| Placebo |
Placebo was administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, administered with approximately 240 mL (8 ounces) of water. Placebo was to be taken on an empty stomach after an overnight fast of approximately 8 hours. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|