Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15-I-0131 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Stony Brook University | OTHER |
| Mansfield Family Practice LLC | OTHER |
| Tufts Medical Center | OTHER |
| New York Medical College |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
The most common tick-borne illness in the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria that are transmitted to people by Ixodes scapularis ticks. Most cases of Lyme disease are cured by antibiotics, but some patients continue to experience symptoms despite the absence of detectable Lyme bacteria. Xenodiagnosis uses a vector to detect the presence of a disease-causing microbe. Researchers will use live, laboratory-bred ticks to see if Lyme disease bacteria can be detected in people after completing antibiotic therapy and if that is more common in people who continue to experience symptoms such as fatigue and joint pain.
Objectives:
- To see if ticks can be used to detect B. burgdorferi in people who have had Lyme disease and received antibiotic therapy and if it correlates with persistent symptoms.
Eligibility:
Design:
Lyme disease is the most common vector borne disease in the United States. Although antibiotic therapy is clinically effective in treating the symptoms of Lyme disease for most patients early in the course of disease, a significant number of patients who receive therapy report persistent symptoms. The cause of persistent symptoms after antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease is an area of great controversy. Recent studies have shown that the organism (Borrelia burgdorferi) may persist in animals after antibiotic therapy and can be detected by using the natural tick vector (Ixodes scapularis) to acquire the organism through feeding (xenodiagnosis). Whether this occurs in humans is unknown. Currently available tests for human Lyme disease do not allow determination of persistent infection after antibiotic therapy.
We performed the first study of the use of I. scapularis larva for the xenodiagnosis of B. burgdorferi infection in humans. Our pilot study showed that xenodiagnosis was well tolerated with no severe adverse events (AEs). The most common AE was mild itching at the site. In this small pilot study, xenodiagnosis for B. burgdorferi was positive in 2 participants and indeterminate in 2 participants. Further studies are needed to determine the sensitivity of xenodiagnosis in evaluating the infection status of Lyme disease patients.
In this proposal, we want to further investigate the utility of xenodiagnosis for identifying persistence of infection with B. burgdorferi in treated human Lyme disease. Our objectives include assessing the link between detection of B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis and persistence of symptoms in patients diagnosed with Lyme disease, within 1 year, post therapy; compare the rate of detection of B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis after therapy in participants with posttreatment Lyme disease symptoms; identify subject characteristics related to the likelihood of detecting B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis including: time from infection, time between infection and therapy, time from therapy; and continue to assess the safety of xenodiagnosis in humans.
The results of study have the potential to resolve this long-standing controversy in Lyme disease pathogenesis. While xenodiagnosis is unlikely to be widely used in clinical practice due to the labor intensity and speed of testing, if our study shows a linkage between positive xenodiagnostic testing and persistence of symptoms after B. burgdorferi infection, it may prove to be a useful tool for testing new strategies for treatment and for correlation with more generally applicable diagnostic markers. Understanding the pathogenesis of persistent symptoms following Lyme disease, and identifying reliable diagnostic tests for determining the success of antibiotic therapy, is critical to the medical management of these patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort #1: Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy | Active Comparator | Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
|
| Cohort #2: Patients with post-Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDs) | Active Comparator | Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
|
| Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans | Active Comparator | Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) |
|
| Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin biopsy | Procedure | Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection of Borrelia Burgdorferi in Ticks After Xenodiagnosis Procedure | Recovered ticks after feeding on research participants were tested for presence of B. burgdorferi using at least one of three procedures:
| 3-6 days post tick placement |
| Participants With Adverse Event Related to the Application of Ticks (Xenodiagnosis) | Safety of xenodiagnosis in humans was assessed by number of participants with adverse event related to the application of ticks. Adverse event was assessed using participants self-reported diary cards and clinical interview. | Up to 30-days after tick removal |
Not provided
Not provided
Criteria for the diagnosis and therapy for Lyme disease can be found at the clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
PATIENTS WITH LYME DISEASE, POST-THERAPY (N=100)
PATIENTS WITH POST-LYME DISEASE COMPLAINTS AT LEAST 12 MONTHS FROM INITIAL TREATMENT (N=40)
ACUTE EM (N=40)
LYME ARTHRITIS (N=40)
HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS (N=20)
Patients with recently diagnosed (acute) EM (within 48 hours of starting antibiotic therapy) and patients with untreated Lyme arthritis will be recruited in an attempt to increase the chances of finding a positive result by xenodiagnosis (an attempt of a positive control) While patients with acute untreated EM would be the best positive control group, it would be unethical to withhold therapy in these patients for the few days required for tick feeding, due to the risk of dissemination of the organism and possible morbidity. Patients with untreated Lyme arthritis will be recruited to establish whether xenodiagnosis can be used to identify infection in late stage Lyme patients where the bacterium is known to be present. These patients have been infected for months and will not be harmed for delaying therapy for a few days. Lyme arthritis is a late manifestation of B. burgdorferi infection, and hematogenous dissemination already occurred at this late stage. Studies have shown that the presence or absence of previous antibiotic treatment is more predictive than the duration of untreated arthritis for the success of antibiotic therapy in Lyme arthritis. Similarly, patients who just started therapy for EM may still have live Borrelia in the skin and xenodiagnosis may be able to recover the bacteria (but culture of skin biopsies from patients with EM become negative very quickly - within one dose - on antibiotic therapy).
While treatment for Lyme disease will not be offered under this protocol, it may be available via different clinical research protocols or regular medical care at the study site. If not, treatment will be prescribed by the patient's primary care. For patients with untreated early Lyme disease (erythema migrans), antibiotics can be started at the same day of tick placement. For patients with untreated Lyme arthritis, antibiotics can be started after collection of xenodiagnostic ticks (usually 4-5 days, up to 7 days). For patients with Lyme arthritis, if less than 14 ticks fed successfully and if the participant agrees, antibiotic treatment can be delayed until after the repeat procedure.
Patients with acute EM and untreated Lyme arthritis will be able to re-enroll as Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy. Therefore, in case of positive results, we will be able to compare between the procedures.
Negative control patients will include healthy volunteers from Lyme endemic areas who have never been diagnosed with Lyme disease and have a negative B. burgdorferi ELISA and C6 antibody titer.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION FROM SKIN BIOPSY PART OF THE PROTOCOL
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adriana R Marques, M.D. | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansfield Family Practice | Storrs | Connecticut | 06268 | United States | ||
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24523212 | Background | Marques A, Telford SR 3rd, Turk SP, Chung E, Williams C, Dardick K, Krause PJ, Brandeburg C, Crowder CD, Carolan HE, Eshoo MW, Shaw PA, Hu LT. Xenodiagnosis to detect Borrelia burgdorferi infection: a first-in-human study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):937-45. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit939. Epub 2014 Feb 11. | |
| 25301228 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
Of the 72 participants consented, one participant was screen failure and 71 participants started the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cohort #1: Patients With Lyme Disease, Post-therapy | Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
| FG001 | Cohort #2: Patients With Post-treatment Lyme Disease Symptoms (PTLDs) | Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
| FG002 | Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans | Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) |
| FG003 | Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis | Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) |
| FG004 | Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers | Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cohort #1: Patients With Lyme Disease, Post-therapy | Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Detection of Borrelia Burgdorferi in Ticks After Xenodiagnosis Procedure | Recovered ticks after feeding on research participants were tested for presence of B. burgdorferi using at least one of three procedures:
| Participants in cohorts 1 & 2 as pre-specified in the protocol. | Posted | Count of Units | Ticks | 3-6 days post tick placement | Ticks | Ticks |
|
Up to 30 days post tick removal
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cohort #1: Patients With Lyme Disease, Post-therapy | Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastroenteritis salmonella | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marques, Adriana | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases | +1 301 435 7668 | amarques@niaid.nih.gov |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 22, 2021 | Apr 23, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008193 | Lyme Disease |
| D064927 | Tick Bites |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016905 | Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections |
| D001424 | Bacterial Infections |
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001800 | Blood Specimen Collection |
| D020525 | Xenodiagnosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) |
|
| Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers | Active Comparator | Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control) |
|
| Blood draw | Procedure | Peripheral blood draws will be performed. |
|
| Xenodiagnosis | Device | Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant. |
|
| Bethesda |
| Maryland |
| 20892 |
| United States |
| Tufts Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| Stony Brook University (State University of New York) | Stony Brook | New York | 11794-8153 | United States |
| New York Medical College | Valhalla | New York | 10595 | United States |
| Telford SR 3rd, Hu LT, Marques A. Is there a place for xenodiagnosis in the clinic? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Nov;12(11):1307-10. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.966084. |
| 24466286 | Background | Hodzic E, Imai D, Feng S, Barthold SW. Resurgence of persisting non-cultivable Borrelia burgdorferi following antibiotic treatment in mice. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086907. eCollection 2014. |
| 31710647 | Result | Turk SP, Lumbard K, Liepshutz K, Williams C, Hu L, Dardick K, Wormser GP, Norville J, Scavarda C, McKenna D, Follmann D, Marques A. Post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms score: Developing a new tool for research. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 11;14(11):e0225012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225012. eCollection 2019. |
| 41563326 | Derived | Marques AR, Ng SP, McCarthy JE, Telford SR 3rd, Dardick K, Wormser GP, Marcos LA, Tokarz R, Williams C, Law M, Norville J, Lundt M, Petnicki-Ocwieja T, Scavarda C, McKenna D, Goethert HK, Mateja A, Follman D, Eshoo MW, Hu LT. Xenodiagnosis to search for Borrelia burgdorferi after antibiotic treatment of Lyme disease: a prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 21:ciag031. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciag031. Online ahead of print. |
| BG001 | Cohort #2: Patients With Post-treatment Lyme Disease Symptoms (PTLDs) | Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
| BG002 | Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans | Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) |
| BG003 | Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis | Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) |
| BG004 | Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers | Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control) |
| BG005 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Cohort #2: Patients With Post-treatment Lyme Disease Symptoms (PTLDs) | Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. |
|
|
| Primary | Participants With Adverse Event Related to the Application of Ticks (Xenodiagnosis) | Safety of xenodiagnosis in humans was assessed by number of participants with adverse event related to the application of ticks. Adverse event was assessed using participants self-reported diary cards and clinical interview. | All participants in who started the study | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 30-days after tick removal |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 1 |
| 40 |
| 35 |
| 40 |
| EG001 | Cohort #2: Patients With Post-treatment Lyme Disease Symptoms (PTLDs) | Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. | 0 | 20 | 3 | 20 | 19 | 20 |
| EG002 | Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans | Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG003 | Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis | Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG004 | Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers | Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control) | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Invasive lobular breast carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Photophobia | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uveitis | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Visual disturbance NOS | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application Site Discharge | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site erythema | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application Site Papule | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site pruritus | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site redness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site swelling | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site tenderness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site vesicles | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fever | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malaise | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thirst | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Allergic reaction | Immune system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insect bite NOS | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle ache | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cognitive function abnormal | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sleep disturbances | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mood alteration NOS | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sore throat | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Night sweats | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgery | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001899 | Borrelia Infections |
| D013145 | Spirochaetales Infections |
| D017282 | Tick-Borne Diseases |
| D000079426 | Vector Borne Diseases |
| D001733 | Bites and Stings |
| D011041 | Poisoning |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D011677 | Punctures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D008828 | Microbiological Techniques |
| Other application site reaction |
|