Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment rates too low to continue with the study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Laryngeal dysfunction is a problem that affects many patients after laryngeal cancer therapy (surgery or radio/chemotherapy). Laryngeal dysfunction is associated with higher incidences of aspiration and respiratory tract complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Current standard of care treatment to reduce the consequences of aspiration is often a tracheostomy which has its own risks and complications. The proposed study aims to describe the performance of a new CE marked medical implant, the NewBreez, in protecting the patient's airways from aspiration.
Aspiration is associated with respiratory tract infections, reduced quality of life and increased mortality in patients. For chronic or unresolved aspiration, patients are often given a tracheostomy for safer breathing and greater protection of the airways from aspirated material. However tracheostomies are associated with risks and complications and do not give a 100% guarantee of aspiration protection to the patient. They also impact the quality of life in a negative way for many patients. The current study will evaluate the performance of a new intralaryngeal device for airway protection in a small group of patients who have chronic aspiration. The study will look at the overall performance of this device in preventing aspiration in this specific group of patients as well as determine any unforeseen risks of using this device in the identified group of patients. The outcomes will form the basis of future studies with larger groups of patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| NewBreez | The study group is composed only of patients who have already opted to receive the NewBreez device as part of their routine care from their physician. Patients who have the device implanted, and consent to be part of the 12 week observational study, will be enrolled and have standard clinical parameters measured over the 12 week period as well as complete quality of life assessments in the form of patient questionnaires. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NewBreez | Device | Intralaryngeal prosthesis to protect the airways |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline Per Patient of Number and Severity of Aspiration Events | In patient change from baseline measurement of aspiration severity and frequency of events at weeks 1,4,8,and 12 | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Reported Adverse Events | Analysis of the reported system or procedure related adverse events using standard AE reporting form | at device implantation |
| Number of Reported Adverse Events |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Reported Device Migration in the Larynx Post Implant | In patient change from baseline position of the device in the larynx of each patient assessed by endoscopy and/or other clinically appropriate methods (CT or video fluoroscopy) and recorded in migration direction and distance (cm) | 1 weeks |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment of patients will primarily be from the department of Ear, Nose and Throat at the hospitals participating in the study. Secondary recruitment could also include associated clinics that treat patients with laryngeal dysfunction and aspiration, such as swallowing therapy clinics, speech language therapy clinics, and linguistics clinics.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ursula Schroeder, Dr. med. | University of Luebeck | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | NewBreez | The study group is composed only of patients who have already opted to receive the NewBreez device as part of their routine care from their physician. Patients who have the device implanted, and consent to be part of the 12 week observational study, will be enrolled and have standard clinical parameters measured over the 12 week period as well as complete quality of life assessments in the form of patient questionnaires. NewBreez: Intralaryngeal prosthesis to protect the airways |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | NewBreez | The study group is composed only of patients who have already opted to receive the NewBreez device as part of their routine care from their physician. Patients who have the device implanted, and consent to be part of the 12 week observational study, will be enrolled and have standard clinical parameters measured over the 12 week period as well as complete quality of life assessments in the form of patient questionnaires. NewBreez: Intralaryngeal prosthesis to protect the airways |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline Per Patient of Number and Severity of Aspiration Events | In patient change from baseline measurement of aspiration severity and frequency of events at weeks 1,4,8,and 12 | First patient: Device was explanted within 48 hours after implantation - no Data could be collected Second Patient: Due to patient's non-compliance no data could be collected.Device was explanted within two weeks after implantation. | Posted | 12 weeks |
|
subject 1: 24 hours after receiving the NewBreez implant subject 2: 11 days after receiving the NewBreez implant
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | NewBreez | The study group is composed only of patients who have already opted to receive the NewBreez device as part of their routine care from their physician. Patients who have the device implanted, and consent to be part of the 12 week observational study, will be enrolled and have standard clinical parameters measured over the 12 week period as well as complete quality of life assessments in the form of patient questionnaires. NewBreez: Intralaryngeal prosthesis to protect the airways |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aspiration | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device migration | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment | device failed to remain in the intended location in the larynx |
Very low recruitment achieved over all sites and early termination of the enrolled subjects gives insufficient data for any meaningful analysis of the product performance and safety in this study.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Nicolini CEO | Protip Medical | 0033388103068 | l.nicolini@protipmedical.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007822 | Laryngeal Neoplasms |
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010039 | Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Analysis of the the rate and severity of reported system or procedure related adverse events as a measure of safety of the device in this patient population over a 12 week period
| 2 weeks |
| Number of Participants With an Increase of Greater Than 1 on the Heyse-Moore Score | In patient change from baseline score of dyspnea using Heyse-Moore (Dyspnea)score: 0 = None
| 1 weeks |
| Change From Baseline of Quality of Life (QoL) Score |
In patient QoL assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks using German standard QoL clinical questionnaire specifically for patients with swallowing dysfunction |
| 12 weeks |
| Reported Subjective Rating of Comfort of the Device in the Larynx | In patient subjective measure (repeated) of pain score (1-10) and comfort level (questionnaire) at weeks 1,4,8,12 | 12 weeks |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Reported Adverse Events | Analysis of the reported system or procedure related adverse events using standard AE reporting form | Posted | Number | adverse events | at device implantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Reported Adverse Events | Analysis of the the rate and severity of reported system or procedure related adverse events as a measure of safety of the device in this patient population over a 12 week period | Posted | Number | AE reported | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With an Increase of Greater Than 1 on the Heyse-Moore Score | In patient change from baseline score of dyspnea using Heyse-Moore (Dyspnea)score: 0 = None
| Second enrolled patient did not reach the first data point, subj. was explanted prior first measurement. | Posted | Number | participants | 1 weeks |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants With Reported Device Migration in the Larynx Post Implant | In patient change from baseline position of the device in the larynx of each patient assessed by endoscopy and/or other clinically appropriate methods (CT or video fluoroscopy) and recorded in migration direction and distance (cm) | Posted | Number | participants | 1 weeks |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Change From Baseline of Quality of Life (QoL) Score | In patient QoL assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks using German standard QoL clinical questionnaire specifically for patients with swallowing dysfunction | Not Posted | 12 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Reported Subjective Rating of Comfort of the Device in the Larynx | In patient subjective measure (repeated) of pain score (1-10) and comfort level (questionnaire) at weeks 1,4,8,12 | Not Posted | 12 weeks | Participants |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D007818 |
| Laryngeal Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |