This is a consumer rated measure that assesses the level of goal related hope a consumer possesses. This version is a 6 item measure, with each item rated on a 4 point scale (range 1-4, with 1 being "Definitely False" and 4 being "Definitely True"). A summary score is calculated by summing all 6 items. Higher scores represent better outcomes (i.e. higher goal related hope). These summary scores were then averages to calculate a mean score for our sample.

This is a consumer rated assessment of adaptive coping skills. This is derived from the 28 item, full scale. The scale uses a 1-4 Likert scale, indicating the frequency of using different coping strategies. There are 14 subscales, each calculated by summing 2 items. The range on each subscale is 2 - 8. The 14 subscales are further combined into 2 larger scales - maladaptive and adaptive coping. Adaptive coping is calculated by averaging the responses from 8 out of the 14 subscales. Higher scores indicate better outcomes (i.e. higher use of adaptive coping strategies).

This is a consumer rated scale assessing medication adherence. This is a 10 item scale with each question rated as "yes" or "no". A yes is assigned a value of 1. The scale ranges from 0 (no "yes" responses) to 10 (all "yes" responses endorsed). The total number of "yes" responses is totaled to create a summary score. The mean score is calculated based on averaging the summary scores for the entire consumer sample. Higher scores mean better outcomes for medication adherence.

This meThis measure is a consumer rated substance abuse screener consisting of 6 "yes" or "no" questions. A response of "yes" is assigned a value of 1. The total number of "yes" responses are summed and a score of greater than 4 indicates likelihood of substance abuse. Higher scores mean worse outcomes for this scale (i.e. the higher the score, the greater the likelihood of substance abuse issues).

This is a consumer rated assessment of adaptive coping skills. This is derived from the 28 item, full scale. The scale uses a 1-4 Likert scale, indicating the frequency of using different coping strategies. There are 14 subscales, each calculated by summing 2 items. The range on each subscale is 2 - 8. The 14 subscales are further combined into 2 larger scales - maladaptive and adaptive coping. Maladaptive coping is calculated by averaging the responses from 6 out of the 14 subscales. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e. higher use of maladaptive coping strategies).

Total of all reporting groups

Every attempt was made to collect this information from all participants, however this data was missing in some instances. Data was collected via self-report, and thus if the question was omitted by the participant the data was not available for analyses.

Every attempt was made to collect this information from all participants, however this data was missing in some instances. Data was collected via self-report, and thus if the question was omitted by the participant the data was not available for analyses.

This measure is designed to assess consumer-rated illness self management skills. This scale is based on a 15 items, each rated on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher numbers of this scale represent better outcomes. A mean score of all 15 items is provided as the primary outcome score for this scale.

This is a consumer rated scale indicated working alliance between consumer and clinician. The scale has 12 items, rated on a 7 point Likert style scale (ranging from 1-7). The total score provided a mean score of all 12 items. Better working alliance is indicated by a higher score.

This scale is a consumer rated assessment of perceived social support systems. There are 12 items each rated on a 7 point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). A mean score is calculated from all 12 items. Higher scores represent better outcomes (i.e. higher levels of perceived social support).

This is a consumer rated measure that assesses the level of goal related hope a consumer possesses. This version is a 6 item measure, with each item rated on a 4 point scale (range 1-4, with 1 being "Definitely False" and 4 being "Definitely True"). A summary score is calculated by summing all 6 items. Higher scores represent better outcomes (i.e. higher goal related hope). These summary scores were then averages to calculate a mean score for our sample.

This is a consumer rated scale assessing medication adherence. This is a 10 item scale with each question rated as "yes" or "no". A yes is assigned a value of 1. The scale ranges from 0 (no "yes" responses) to 10 (all "yes" responses endorsed). The total number of "yes" responses is totaled to create a summary score. The mean score is calculated based on averaging the summary scores for the entire consumer sample. Higher scores mean better outcomes for medication adherence.

This measure is a consumer rated substance abuse screener consisting of 6 "yes" or "no" questions. A response of "yes" is assigned a value of 1. The total number of "yes" responses are summed and a score of greater than 4 indicates likelihood of substance abuse. Higher scores mean worse outcomes for this scale (i.e. the higher the score, the greater the likelihood of substance abuse issues).

This is a consumer rated assessment of adaptive coping skills. This is derived from the 28 item, full scale. The scale uses a 1-4 Likert scale, indicating the frequency of using different coping strategies. There are 14 subscales, each calculated by summing 2 items. The range on each subscale is 2 - 8. The 14 subscales are further combined into 2 larger scales - maladaptive and adaptive coping. Adaptive coping is calculated by averaging the responses from 8 out of the 14 subscales. Higher scores indicate better outcomes (i.e. higher use of adaptive coping strategies).

This is a consumer rated assessment of adaptive coping skills. This is derived from the 28 item, full scale. The scale uses a 1-4 Likert scale, indicating the frequency of using different coping strategies. There are 14 subscales, each calculated by summing 2 items. The range on each subscale is 2 - 8. The 14 subscales are further combined into 2 larger scales - maladaptive and adaptive coping. Maladaptive coping is calculated by averaging the responses from 6 out of the 14 subscales. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e. higher use of maladaptive coping strategies).

Clinician competency rating scale was used to assess clinician competence in providing IMR. This data was used to test the theory that IMR competency would impact consumers' ability to engage in illness self management practices as rated by the Illness Management and Recovery Scale. This scale is rated by trained observers, and the scale contains 16 items, rated on a 1 - 5 point scale. A 5 indicates higher competency and fidelity to the IMR treatment model. A mean score is calculated across all 16 items. Higher scores indicate higher clinician competence in providing IMR.

This is a consumer rated scale indicated working alliance between consumer and clinician. The scale has 12 items, rated on a 7 point Likert style scale (ranging from 1-7). The total score provided a mean score of all 12 items. Better working alliance is indicated by a higher score.

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

This scale is a consumer rated assessment of perceived social support systems. There are 12 items each rated on a 7 point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). A mean score is calculated from all 12 items. Higher scores represent better outcomes (i.e. higher levels of perceived social support).

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

This is a consumer rated measure that assesses the level of goal related hope a consumer possesses. This version is a 6 item measure, with each item rated on a 4 point scale (range 1-4, with 1 being "Definitely False" and 4 being "Definitely True"). A summary score is calculated by summing all 6 items. Higher scores represent better outcomes (i.e. higher goal related hope). These summary scores were then averages to calculate a mean score for our sample.

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

This is a consumer rated assessment of adaptive coping skills. This is derived from the 28 item, full scale. The scale uses a 1-4 Likert scale, indicating the frequency of using different coping strategies. There are 14 subscales, each calculated by summing 2 items. The range on each subscale is 2 - 8. The 14 subscales are further combined into 2 larger scales - maladaptive and adaptive coping. Adaptive coping is calculated by averaging the responses from 8 out of the 14 subscales. Higher scores indicate better outcomes (i.e. higher use of adaptive coping strategies).

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

This is a consumer rated scale assessing medication adherence. This is a 10 item scale with each question rated as "yes" or "no". A yes is assigned a value of 1. The scale ranges from 0 (no "yes" responses) to 10 (all "yes" responses endorsed). The total number of "yes" responses is totaled to create a summary score. The mean score is calculated based on averaging the summary scores for the entire consumer sample. Higher scores mean better outcomes for medication adherence.

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

This meThis measure is a consumer rated substance abuse screener consisting of 6 "yes" or "no" questions. A response of "yes" is assigned a value of 1. The total number of "yes" responses are summed and a score of greater than 4 indicates likelihood of substance abuse. Higher scores mean worse outcomes for this scale (i.e. the higher the score, the greater the likelihood of substance abuse issues).

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

This is a consumer rated assessment of adaptive coping skills. This is derived from the 28 item, full scale. The scale uses a 1-4 Likert scale, indicating the frequency of using different coping strategies. There are 14 subscales, each calculated by summing 2 items. The range on each subscale is 2 - 8. The 14 subscales are further combined into 2 larger scales - maladaptive and adaptive coping. Maladaptive coping is calculated by averaging the responses from 6 out of the 14 subscales. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e. higher use of maladaptive coping strategies).

Every effort was made to collect post-intervention follow up data for participants. In some instances, participants were unable to provide this information (i.e. hospitalized, unable to attend data collection session, unwilling). As all outcome measures were consumer self-rated, if the consumer was unavailable data is missing for that participant.

Clinician participants who are providing Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) intervention.