Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to compare the effect of the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique vs. the conventional lightwand intubation technique on the cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with the simulated cervical immobilization.
In clinical practice, the investigators have occasionally experienced some difficulties in the lightwand intubation in patients with cervical spine instability because manual in-line stabilization during intubation hinders free movements of the lightwand such as advancement, withdrawal, and scooping in the oral cavity. For this reason, jaw thrust is often used to secure enough space for free movements of the lightwand in the oral cavity in the traditional lightwand intubation technique. A recent study showed that laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation provided more successful intubation on the first attempt and less scooping movement than the traditional lightwand intubation by facilitating free movements of the lightwand in the oral cavity in patients with cervical immobilization during intubation for cervical spine surgery. In the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique, the direct laryngoscope may provide sufficient space for free movements of the lightwand in the oral cavity without jaw thrust, which can result in cervical spine movement. However, the effect of the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique on cervical spine motion is not investigated yet.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation - traditional lightwand intubation |
|
| Group B | Experimental | traditional lightwand intubation - laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation | Device | laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| maximum cervical spine motion | maximum angles measured at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, C2-C5 segments. | during tracheal intubation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| intubation time | during tracheal intubation | |
| number of intubation trial | during tracheal intubation | |
| sore throat, pain score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD | Contact | 82-2-2072-2466 | hppark@snu.ac.kr | |
| Tae Kyong Kim, MD | Contact | 82-2- 2072-2469 | ktkktk@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD | Seoul National University of Hospital | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16116013 | Background | Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):910-915. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166975.38649.27. | |
| 10702469 | Background | Davis L, Cook-Sather SD, Schreiner MS. Lighted stylet tracheal intubation: a review. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):745-56. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00044. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| traditional lightwand intubation | Device | traditional lightwand intubation |
|
| after extubation ~ postoperative day 1 |
| 28244946 | Derived | Kim TK, Son JD, Seo H, Lee YS, Bae J, Park HP. A Randomized Crossover Study Comparing Cervical Spine Motion During Intubation Between Two Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: Laryngoscope-Assisted Versus Conventional Lightwand Intubation. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):485-490. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001813. |