Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRX_2016_01 | Other Identifier | Ethicon Endosurgery (Industry Sponsor) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LINX device in patients who have previously undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity and have chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study will monitor safety and changes in reflux symptoms.
The objective of this study is to confirm safety and efficacy after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in subjects indicated for LINX is similar to the outcomes that formed the basis for the LINX Premarket Approval to support modification of the current labeling. Presently, there is a precautionary statement that safety and effectiveness of the LINX has not been established for prior esophageal or gastric surgery or endoscopic intervention.
Patients with GERD that have undergone a LSG procedure have limited surgical treatment options if they are looking for an alternative to continuous acid suppression therapy (i.e. proton pump inhibitors or equivalent). One procedure, fundoplication, is extremely difficult to perform as LSG patients have a limited amount of fundus tissue remaining after sleeve surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be chosen as a conversion procedure but is more invasive with the potential for serious complications. LINX may be considered as an alternative and less invasive option that may potentially have few complications compared to RYGB.
The study is an observational, multicenter, single-arm study with prospective enrollment. Based on the observational status of the study, no formal statistical hypothesis tests will be conducted. Up to 30 patients meeting the eligibility requirements will be implanted with LINX and followed through 12-months after implant. Up to twelve (12) clinical sites will enroll subjects. Safety evaluations will be ongoing throughout the duration of the study, starting at the implant procedure. Efficacy endpoints will be evaluated at the 12-month visit.
Safety will be evaluated based on the rate of serious device and procedure related adverse events (AEs). Safety will also be evaluated by endoscopy to assess the mucosa and x-rays to verify device location at 12 months post implant. Efficacy will be measured at 12 months (compared to baseline) by examining 3 variables: normalization of total distal acid exposure or at least a 50% reduction, at least a 50% reduction in total GERD-HRQL scores and at least a 50% reduction in average daily PPI dosage.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single arm study | Other | Previous LSG patient will be treated with the LINX device and serve as their own control |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINX device | Device | The LINX device is a permanent implant placed at the area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and is designed to augment a weak LES and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Total Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)- Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Score Compared to Baseline (Off GERD Medications) at the 12-month Follow-up | Percentage of participants reporting >=50% reduction in total GERD-HRQL score compared to baseline (off GERD Medications) at the 12-month follow-up were reported. The GERD-HRQL score consisted of 10 questions, where participants were required to answer each question on a scale of 0 to 5 (0: no symptoms; 1: symptoms noticeable but not bothersome; 2: symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day; 3: symptoms bothersome every day; 4: symptoms affect daily activity; 5: symptoms are incapacitating, unable to do activities). The total score was derived by simply adding the individual score of each question. The total score ranged from 0 to 50 where a higher score indicated more severe disease. The best possible total GERD-HRQL score was 0 (asymptomatic in all questions) and the worst possible score was 50 (incapacitated in all questions). | Up to 12 Months |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Normalization of Total Distal Acid Exposure Time or at Least a 50% Reduction in Total Distal Acid Exposure Time Compared to Baseline at the 12-month Follow-up | Percentage of participants reporting normalization of total distal acid exposure time or at least a 50% reduction in total distal acid at the 12-month follow-up were reported. The testing was performed by a reflux sensing implantable capsule (for example, Bravo) or via a trans-nasal catheter. Success of the LINX device in decreasing abnormal levels of gastric acid in the esophagus was defined as normalization of distal acid exposure time (pH less than [<] 4 for greater than or equal to [>=] 4.5% of monitoring time) or at least 50% reduction in distal acid exposure time compared to baseline. | Up to 12 months |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting >=50% Reduction in Average Daily Protocol Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Dosage Compared to Baseline at the 12-month Follow-up | Percentage of participants reporting >=50% reduction in average daily protocol pump inhibitors (PPIs) dosage compared to baseline at the 12-month follow-up were reported. |
Not provided
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Subjects included in the study must meet all the following criteria:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Subjects should be excluded from the study based on the following criteria:
The procedure is an emergency procedure.
Suspected or known allergies to titanium, stainless steel, nickel, or ferrous materials.
Presence of ˃3 cm hiatal hernia as determined by endoscopy or barium esophagram.
Subject had any major complications related to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy that may interfere with, or increase the risks of the LINX procedure (such as, but not limited to, leaks from the gastric remnant and infection at the sleeve gastrectomy)
Plans to surgically revise the gastric pouch (either known preoperatively or decided intraoperatively)
Currently being treated with another investigational drug or investigational device.
Suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer or prior gastric or esophageal surgery or endoscopic intervention for GERD (with the exception of sleeve gastrectomy).
Distal amplitude <35 mmHg or <70% peristaltic sequences (if using Conventional Manometry). -or- If using High Resolution Manometry (exclude for any of the following):
Presence of esophagitis - Grade C or D (LA Classification).
BMI >35.
Symptoms of dysphagia more than once per week within the last 3 months.
Diagnosed with Scleroderma.
Diagnosed with an esophageal motility disorder such as but not limited to achalasia, nutcracker esophagus, or diffuse esophageal spasm or hypertensive LES.
Subject has a history of or known esophageal stricture or gross esophageal anatomic abnormalities (Schatzki's ring, obstructive lesions, etc.)
Subject has esophageal or gastric varices
History of/or known Barrett's esophagus. Note: The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus requires both endoscopic and histologic evidence of metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopically, there must be columnar epithelium within the esophagus. Histologically, the epithelium must be metaplastic, as defined by the presence of goblet cells.by
Subject cannot understand trial requirements or is unable to comply with follow-up schedule
Pregnant or nursing, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study.
Any reason which the Investigator believes may cause the subject to be non-compliant with or unable to meet the protocol requirements.
Subject has an electrical implant or metallic, abdominal implants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| William J. Petraiuolo, MD | Ethicon Endo-Surgery | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwest Allied Bariatric & Foregut Surgery | Tucson | Arizona | 85741 | United States | ||
| Mercy Health Northwest Arkansas |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | LINX Device | Participants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who previously underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were treated with the LINX Reflux Management System, a laparoscopic, fundic-sparing anti-reflux device designed to augment a weak lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 25, 2018 | Jun 8, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Up to 12 months |
| Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events After LINX Placement Out to 12 Months | Number of participants experiencing serious device and/or procedure related adverse events after LINX placement out to 12 months were reported. SAE is any AE that results in: requires subject hospitalization greater than (>) 24 hours; is life-threatening or results in death; requires prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in fetal distress, fetal death, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect; requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage of body function or structure; other serious important medical events that do not fit in the other outcomes and may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes. | Up to 12 months |
| Rogers |
| Arkansas |
| 72758 |
| United States |
| Keck Medical Center of USC | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery | Englewood | Colorado | 80113 | United States |
| RWJBH Univ. Hospital Somerset/Advanced Surgical and Bariatrics of NJ, PA | Somerset | New Jersey | 08873 | United States |
| Buffalo General Medical Center | Buffalo | New York | 14203 | United States |
| Adirondack Surgical Group | Saranac Lake | New York | 12983 | United States |
| East Carolina University | Greenville | North Carolina | 27834 | United States |
| University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Coastal Carolina Bariatric & Surgical Center | Summerville | South Carolina | 29485 | United States |
| Panhandle Weight Loss Center | Amarillo | Texas | 79106 | United States |
| Gunderson Health System | La Crosse | Wisconsin | 54601 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | LINX Device | Participants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who previously underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were treated with the LINX Reflux Management System, a laparoscopic, fundic-sparing anti-reflux device designed to augment a weak lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Total Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)- Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Score Compared to Baseline (Off GERD Medications) at the 12-month Follow-up | Percentage of participants reporting >=50% reduction in total GERD-HRQL score compared to baseline (off GERD Medications) at the 12-month follow-up were reported. The GERD-HRQL score consisted of 10 questions, where participants were required to answer each question on a scale of 0 to 5 (0: no symptoms; 1: symptoms noticeable but not bothersome; 2: symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day; 3: symptoms bothersome every day; 4: symptoms affect daily activity; 5: symptoms are incapacitating, unable to do activities). The total score was derived by simply adding the individual score of each question. The total score ranged from 0 to 50 where a higher score indicated more severe disease. The best possible total GERD-HRQL score was 0 (asymptomatic in all questions) and the worst possible score was 50 (incapacitated in all questions). | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of participants who met all eligibility criteria, provided informed consent, completed baseline assessments, and underwent a LINX procedure. Here, 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) included all participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Up to 12 Months |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Normalization of Total Distal Acid Exposure Time or at Least a 50% Reduction in Total Distal Acid Exposure Time Compared to Baseline at the 12-month Follow-up | Percentage of participants reporting normalization of total distal acid exposure time or at least a 50% reduction in total distal acid at the 12-month follow-up were reported. The testing was performed by a reflux sensing implantable capsule (for example, Bravo) or via a trans-nasal catheter. Success of the LINX device in decreasing abnormal levels of gastric acid in the esophagus was defined as normalization of distal acid exposure time (pH less than [<] 4 for greater than or equal to [>=] 4.5% of monitoring time) or at least 50% reduction in distal acid exposure time compared to baseline. | The FAS consisted of participants who met all eligibility criteria, provided informed consent, completed baseline assessments, and underwent a LINX procedure. Here, 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) included all participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Up to 12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Reporting >=50% Reduction in Average Daily Protocol Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Dosage Compared to Baseline at the 12-month Follow-up | Percentage of participants reporting >=50% reduction in average daily protocol pump inhibitors (PPIs) dosage compared to baseline at the 12-month follow-up were reported. | The FAS consisted of participants who met all eligibility criteria, provided informed consent, completed baseline assessments, and underwent a LINX procedure. Here, 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) included all participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Up to 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events After LINX Placement Out to 12 Months | Number of participants experiencing serious device and/or procedure related adverse events after LINX placement out to 12 months were reported. SAE is any AE that results in: requires subject hospitalization greater than (>) 24 hours; is life-threatening or results in death; requires prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in fetal distress, fetal death, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect; requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage of body function or structure; other serious important medical events that do not fit in the other outcomes and may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes. | The FAS consisted of participants who met all eligibility criteria, provided informed consent, completed baseline assessments, and underwent a LINX procedure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 12 months |
|
Up to 12 months
Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of participants who met all eligibility criteria, provided informed consent, completed baseline assessments, and underwent a LINX procedure.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | LINX Device | Participants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who previously underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were treated with the LINX Reflux Management System, a laparoscopic, fundic-sparing anti-reflux device designed to augment a weak lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms. | 0 | 30 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 30 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Esophageal spasm | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Epigastric pain and bloating | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Esophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Face tingling and pain | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Foam pooling in throat | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypersensitivity to Dermabond | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post-Op Atelectasis & pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting, pain in chest and nausea | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Neither the complete nor any part of the results of the study carried out under this protocol, nor any of the information provided by the Sponsor for the purposes of performing the study, will be published or passed on to any third party without the written consent of Sponsor. Any Investigator involved with this study is obligated to provide the Sponsor with complete test results and all data derived from the study.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Medical Director | Torax Medical, Inc | 844-434-4210 | ClinicalTrialDisclosure@its.jnj.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 15, 2021 | Jun 8, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005764 | Gastroesophageal Reflux |
| D009765 | Obesity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015154 | Esophageal Motility Disorders |
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D001835 | Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|