Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Approximately 120 subjects will be comparing two soft contact lenses for one week each.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| senofilcon A/ delefilcon A/ senofilcon A | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to one two lens wear sequences. Subjects randomized to this sequence first wore the senofilcon A contact lens, then wore the delefilcon A contact lens second and then wore the senofilcon A contact lens third. |
|
| delefilcon A/senofilcon A/ delfilcon A | Active Comparator | Subjects were randomized to one two lens wear sequences. Subjects randomized to this sequence first wore the delefilcon A contact lens then wore the senofilcon A contact lens second and then wore the Control lens delefilcon A contact lens third. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| senofilcon A | Device | Subjects will wear the contact lenses in both eyes for seven days |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective Overall Comfort | Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. | 1-week Follow-up |
| Subjective Overall Vision | Subjective Overall Vision was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Vison scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. | 1-week Follow-up |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery | Alabama | 36109 | United States | |||
A total of 120 subjects were enrolled into this study. All enrolled subjects were dispensed a study lens. Of the dispensed subjects 1 was discontinued from the study and 119 subjects completed the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Senofilcon A / Delefilcon A/ Senofilcon A | Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two lens sequences, over three lens wear periods. Subjects randomized to this sequence first wore the senofilcon A contact lens, then wore the delefilcon A contact lens second and then wore the senofilcon A contact lens third. |
| FG001 | Delefilcon A / Senofilcon A / Delefilcon A | Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two lens sequences, over three lens wear periods. Subjects randomized to this sequence first wore delefilcon A contact lens, then wore the senofilcon A second and then wore the delefilcon A contact lens third. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Period 2 |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Period 3 |
|
All subjects that randomized to one of two sequences of lens wear.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Senofilcon A / Delefilcon A / Senofilcon A | All subjects that randomized to receive this sequence and were dispensed a study lens. |
| BG001 | Delefilcon A / Senofilcon A / Delefilcon A |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Subjective Overall Comfort | Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. | The Analysis population includes subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. Due to the study design the number of observations analyzed is larger than the number of participants. This is due to the fact that some subjects wore senofilcon A twice while some subjects wore delefilcon A twice (see Participant Flow). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1-week Follow-up | Observations | Observations |
|
Throughout the duration of the study- approximately 1 month.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Senofilcon A | Subjects that received the senofilcon A contact lens in at least one of the three study periods. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John R. Buch, O.D., M.S., F.A.A.O. | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. | 904-443-3500 | 1707 | JBUCH@its.jnj.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| delefilcon A | Device | Subjects will wear the contact lenses in both eyes for seven days |
|
|
| Jacksonville Beach |
| Florida |
| 32250 |
| United States |
| Longwood | Florida | 32779 | United States |
| Winter Park | Florida | 32792 | United States |
| Westerville | Ohio | 43081 | United States |
| Salem | Virginia | 24153 | United States |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
All subjects that randomized to receive this sequence and were dispensed a study lens.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Senofilcon A |
Subjects that received the senofilcon A contact lens in at least one of the three study periods. |
| OG001 | Delefilcon A | Subjects that received the delefilcon A contact lens in at least one of the three study periods. |
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Overall Vision | Subjective Overall Vision was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Vison scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. | The Analysis population includes subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. Due to the study design the number of observations analyzed is larger than the number of participants. This is due to the fact that some subjects wore senofilcon A twice while some subjects wore delefilcon A twice (see Participant Flow). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1-week Follow-up | Observations | Observations |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 120 |
| 0 |
| 120 |
| EG001 | Delefilcon A | Subjects that received the delefilcon A contact lens in at least one of the three study periods. | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 |
Not provided