Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C in subjects with MG exacerbations.
The study consisted of a single dose course of IGIV-C treatment followed by 28-days of post-infusion assessments. The total duration of study participation for each subject was up to 28 ± 2 days. Approximately 50 subjects, ages 18 or greater, were planned to be enrolled in the study and receive a single, total dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C over 2 consecutive days (dose of 1 g/kg per day) across multiple centers in Argentina, Canada, Europe, and South Africa.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGIV-C Treatment | Experimental | In this arm, subjects with myasthenia gravis exacerbations were treated with an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C, which was administered over 2 consecutive days at a dose of 1 g/kg per day. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGIV-C | Biological | An IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered over 2 consecutive days at a dose of 1 g/kg per day. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score | Mean Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG Scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome. | From Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by QMG | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Italiano | Buenos Aires | C1181ACH | Argentina | |||
| Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | IGIV-C Treatment | An IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered in subjects with myasthenia gravis exacerbations. IGIV-C: an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered as 2 doses of 1 g/kg on two consecutive days |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 30, 2016 | Apr 9, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL Scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 2-point decrease in the MG-ADL score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG-DAL scale are 0 and 24, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome. | Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by the MG Composite | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in the MG Composite score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG Composite scale are 0 and 50, respectively, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome. | Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
| Buenos Aires |
| C1221ADC |
| Argentina |
| Hospital Cordoba | Córdoba | X5004CDT | Argentina |
| AZ St Lucas Gent | Ghent | East Flanders | 9000 | Belgium |
| UZ Leuven | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| University of Alberta Hospital | Edmonton | Alberta | T6G 2B7 | Canada |
| London Health Sciences Centre | London | Ontario | N6A 5A5 | Canada |
| University Health Network (UHN) - Toronto General Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2C4 | Canada |
| Fakultni nemocnice Brno, Neurologicka klinika | Brno | Czechia |
| Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava, Neurologická klinika | Ostrava | 70800 | Czechia |
| Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze | Prague | 12808 | Czechia |
| East Tallinn Central Hospital | Tallinn | 10138 | Estonia |
| Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer | Bron | Lyon | 69677 | France |
| Hôpital Albert Michallon | Grenoble | 38700 | France |
| Hopital Roger Salengro | Lille | 59037 | France |
| Hôpital de la Timone | Marseille | 13385 | France |
| Hôpital Hautepierre Strasbourg | Strasbourg | 67200 | France |
| CHU de Toulouse - Hôpital Purpan | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| Jahn Ferenc Del-Pesti Korhaz | Budapest | 1204 | Hungary |
| Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz | Kistarcsa | 2143 | Hungary |
| Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kórházak és Egyetemi Oktatókórház | NyÃregyháza | Hungary |
| University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine | Szeged | 4400 | Hungary |
| Zala Megyei Korhaz | Zalaegerszeg | 8900 | Hungary |
| Riga East Clinical University Hospital | Riga | LV-1038 | Latvia |
| Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne | Gdansk | Poland |
| Institutul Clinic Fundeni | Bucharest | 22328 | Romania |
| Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Targu-Mures | Târgu Mureş | RO540136 | Romania |
| State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Nizhniy Novgorod region. Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after N.A.Semashko | Nizhny Novgorod | 603126 | Russia |
| Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare. City Multi-field Hospital # 2 | Saint Petersburg | 357538 | Russia |
| State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare "Samara Regional Clinical Hospital. V.D.Seredavin | Samara | 443095 | Russia |
| Groote Schuur Hospital, | Cape Town | South Africa |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
The demographic data are from the Safety population that consisted of all 49 subjects who were infused with any amount of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | IGIV-C Treatment | An IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered in subjects with myasthenia gravis exacerbations. IGIV-C: an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered as 2 doses of 1 g/kg on two consecutive days |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | year |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score | Mean Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG Scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome. | The primary efficacy analysis of change in the score of MG symptoms as measured by the change in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 in the Evaluable population which consisted of all subjects who received the entire dose of Investigational Product (2 g/kg over 2 consecutive days) and had valid baseline and Day 14 QMG Score measurements. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | From Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by QMG | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome. | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the QMG scale in the Evaluable population is presented. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL Scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 2-point decrease in the MG-ADL score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG-DAL scale are 0 and 24, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome. | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL in the Evaluable population is presented. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by the MG Composite | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in the MG Composite score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG Composite scale are 0 and 50, respectively, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome. | The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 |
|
|
Subjects with MG exacerbations not attributable to an infection or change in medication were planned to receive 2 g/kg of IGIV-C on Day 0 (Baseline) and on Day 1 (dosed as 1 g/kg per day), followed by 28 days of post-infusion assessments. During this 30-day period, the adverse event data were collected.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | IGIV-C Treatment | An IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered in subjects with myasthenia gravis exacerbations. IGIV-C: an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered as 2 doses of 1 g/kg on two consecutive days | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | 30 | 49 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Site may publish results from the Study, after providing Sponsor thirty days' notice prior to submitting a manuscript or other materials related to the Study to any outside party. At Sponsors' request, Site will remove any Confidential Information (other than Study results), and Site will upon Sponsors' request, delay publication or presentation for a period of up to one hundred twenty days to allow Sponsor to protect its interests in any Sponsor Inventions.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhonda Griffin | Grifols Therapeutics LLC | 9193166693 | Rhonda.Griffin@grifols.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 4, 2017 | Apr 9, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Latvia |
|
| Romania |
|
| Belgium |
|
| Czechia |
|
| Poland |
|
| South Africa |
|
| France |
|
| Russia |
|
|
|
|