Augmented Medial Rectus Muscle Recession Versus Medial Rectus Recession With Posterior Scleral Fixation in Partially Accommodative Esotropia
Augmented Medial Rectus Muscle Recession Versus Medial Rectus Recession With Posterior Scleral Fixation in Partially Accommodative Esotropia
Prospective randomized interventional comparative study
A prospective controlled interventional study will be performed on patients with partially accommodative esotropia. An informed consent for the surgery will be obtained from all patients. All patients' guardians will receive a thorough explanation of the study design and aims, and sign a written informed consent.
An estimation of sample size was performed considering a study power of 0.8 with an alpha error of 0.05 aiming to detect a difference of 5 Δ in the postoperative angle disparity between the 2 groups, assuming a postoperative standard deviation of 6 Δ 9. Based on this estimation, a total of 24 eyes were found to be adequate in each group, and considering a 25% dropout during the follow-up, recruitment of 30 study subjects in each group will be targeted
All patients will receive a full ophthalmological assessment including history taking, measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination, as well as a dilated fundus examination.
In addition, all patients will have a detailed motor examination during the initial evaluation and at each follow-up period. The angle of misalignment will be measured by the prism and alternating cover tests for both distance and near with and without glasses. The angle of horizontal misalignment will also be measured in side gazes and in straight up and down gazes. Measurement of the angle of deviation in up and down gazes will be done by tilting the head, approximately 25 degrees down and up respectively, with the patient fixing on a distance target. The difference between the angles of horizontal misalignment in up and down gazes will be used to calculate the amount of pattern strabismus if present.
The ductions and versions in all cardinal directions of gaze will be analyzed before surgery and thereafter during the postoperative follow up visits. Underaction will be measured on a 4-point scale ranging from -1 to -4. Similarly overaction will be measured on a 4-point scale ranging from +1 to +4.
In all patients cycloplegic refraction will be performed using cyclopentolate 1% eye drops instilled 3 times 10 minutes apart with the last time 30 minutes before refraction. Patients with hypermetropia with a spherical equivalent >= +1.5 D will then prescribed the full cycloplegic refraction and then re-evaluated with spectacles one month later. Patients who appear to have a partially accommodative esotropia defined as residual esotropia >8 PD for distance with spectacles will have repeat refraction using atropine 1% drops 3 times a days for 3 days before refraction.
After ensuring that full cycloplegic refraction was prescribed, patients will then evaluated with glasses to identify those with partially accommodative esotropia without convergence excess. Patients will be included in the study if the residual distance angle with cycloplegic prescription was > 15PD. Patients with convergence excess esotropia, defined as the angle of deviation with glasses for near exceeding that for distance by 15 PD or more will be excluded from the study.
Amblyopia, defined as a difference of 0.3 logMAR in verbal children (3 lines on the standard logMAR visual acuity chart) or a strong unilateral fixation preference using an accommodative target in infants and preverbal children will be treated before surgery following the standard clinical practice using part-time occlusion and in concordance with the PEDIG guidelines.
The smallest angle of deviation will be defined as the corrected angle for distance. The largest angle is defined as the angle for near measured without correction. The angle disparity is defined as the difference between the largest and smallest angles.
Patients were randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups. In one group bilateral augmented MR muscle recession will be performed (augmented group). In the other group bilateral MR muscle recession combined with posterior scleral fixation sutures will be performed (Faden group).
The surgeries were performed using the same surgical technique. In both groups the medial rectus muscle will be exposed and hooked through a limbal approach. The muscle will then secured with 6-0 polyglactin sutures.
In the augmented group, the medial rectus muscles will be recessed using standard tables with the surgical dose targeting the average of the largest and smallest angles.
In the Faden group, medial rectus muscle recession will be performed as described above with the surgical dose targeting the smallest pre-operative angle. The muscle will then be fixated to the sclera using 6/0 polyester sutures placed in a mattress like with the anterior and the posterior sutures passing through both the edge of muscle and the sclera 12 mm and 14 mm from the muscle insertion, respectively.
Patients will be followed up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. The distance and near angles of deviation, with and without glasses, and the angle disparity were measured at each follow up visit and the ductions and versions will be assessed in all patients.
Patients will be considered to have successful outcome if both the distance and near angles with spectacles were less than 8 PD esotropia/phoria. Patients who develop any exophoria/tropia, or in whom hyperopic correction needed to be reduced for treatment of a consecutive exotropia will be considered to be unsuccessful. In addition, patients will be further subdivided into 2 groups according to the preoperative angle disparity into those with angle disparity 20 PD or less and those with angle disparity more than 20 PD. The success rate in each subgroup was calculated.
For categorical variables (e.g., gender), percent distribution will be used. For continuous variables (e.g. age, angle of deviation), mean, range and standard deviation will be used. Comparisons between the two groups were done using t-test for independent samples for continuous variables and chi square test for categorical variables. Statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: