Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDT with blue light and topical Levulan in the treatment of actinic cheilitis.
The study will consist of a screening visit, up to three scheduled treatments, and two scheduled office visits. There can be a three-day window period for each scheduled visit in order to accommodate the subject's schedule and unforeseen scheduling conflicts.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDT | Experimental | PDT with aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (HCl) and blue light to the affected area of the lips every six weeks for up to three treatments |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride | Drug |
|
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a Change in Clearance From Baseline | Clearance will be estimated clinically as minimal (0%-25%), mild (26%-50%), moderate (51%-75%), good (76%-99%), or complete (100%). Results will also be evaluated by comparing photographs before and immediately after treatments, and 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment. | Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average Change in Participant Reported Pain | Subject reported pain before, during and after blue light illumination was documented using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The maximum change in pain is 10 for each occurrence (pain before compared to during treatment and pain during compared to after treatment). This is multiplied by the number of subjects and then divided by the number of treatments to generate the range. The summation of the change between subject reported pain prior to compared to during blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. The summation of the change between subject reported pain during compared to after blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael S Chapman, MD | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03766 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22714758 | Background | Ribeiro CF, Souza FH, Jordao JM, Haendchen LC, Mesquita L, Schmitt JV, Faucz LL. Photodynamic therapy in actinic cheilitis: clinical and anatomopathological evaluation of 19 patients. An Bras Dermatol. 2012 May-Jun;87(3):418-23. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962012000300011. | |
| 22052302 | Background | Zaiac M, Clement A. Treatment of actinic cheilitis by photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid and blue light activation. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Nov;10(11):1240-5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Twenty four patients were screened to participate, but only 20 entered into the study (3 men and 1 woman screen failed). This was an open label proof of concept study and our goal was to enroll a total of 20 patients, which we achieved.
Twenty four patients were screened to participate. Three men and one woman did not meet criteria to participate in the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Photodynamic Therapy With Blue Light | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (HCl) and blue light to the affected area of the lips every six weeks up to three treatments. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Twenty four patients were screened, but only 20 were included in the study and proceeded to the baseline assessment. Nine men and 11 women RECEIVED AT LEAST ONE TREATMENT.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Photodynamic Therapy With Blue Light | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (HCl) and blue light to the affected area of the lips every six weeks up to three treatments. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With a Change in Clearance From Baseline | Clearance will be estimated clinically as minimal (0%-25%), mild (26%-50%), moderate (51%-75%), good (76%-99%), or complete (100%). Results will also be evaluated by comparing photographs before and immediately after treatments, and 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment. | Twenty patients were enrolled into the study. Please see baseline characteristics to understand the patient demographic. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36) |
|
Visits 2 (Baseline), Visits 3 (week 6), and Visit 4 (week 12), Visit 5 (week 24), Visit 6 (week 36)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Photodynamic Therapy With Blue Light | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (HCl) and blue light to the affected area of the lips every six weeks up to three treatments |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding esophageal ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Bleeding esophageal ulcer requiring inpatient hospitalization during the study treatment. This was deemed unrelated to the study treatment. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URI | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michael Shane Chapman Section Chief of Dermatology | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | 603-650-3106 | Michael.Shane.Chapman@hitchcock.org |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 14, 2014 | Aug 7, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C535669 | Actinic cheilitis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000622 | Aminolevulinic Acid |
| D010778 | Photochemotherapy |
| D000095743 | Blue Light |
| C008848 | 1-phenyl-3,3-dimethyltriazene |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007982 | Levulinic Acids |
| D007651 | Keto Acids |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Photodynamic therapy with blue light |
| Procedure |
|
|
| Baseline to Week 36 |
| Average Change in Local Skin Reactions to Blue Light Treatment | Assessments of swelling, erythema, and flaking/scaling were conducted after each treatment and two days post-treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The average change in swelling, erythema and flaking/scaling after each treatment and two days post treatment were divided by the 50 total treatments to obtain the average value. | Baseline to Week 36 |
| The Number of Participants Who Developed a Local Skin Reaction to Blue Light Treatment: Vesiculation/Pustulation, Erosion/Ulceration, Crusting and Hyperpigmentation | Assessments of vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration, and crusting were conducted immediately after each blue light treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The presence or absence of hyperpigmentation in the treatment area was also documented after each treatment visit. The total number of participants who developed a local skin reaction is documented. | Baseline to Week 36 |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Evaluation of any reported local or systemic events outside the treatment area and other than those specified under local skin reactions or PDT reactions. | Baseline to Week 36 |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Income | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Average Change in Participant Reported Pain | Subject reported pain before, during and after blue light illumination was documented using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The maximum change in pain is 10 for each occurrence (pain before compared to during treatment and pain during compared to after treatment). This is multiplied by the number of subjects and then divided by the number of treatments to generate the range. The summation of the change between subject reported pain prior to compared to during blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. The summation of the change between subject reported pain during compared to after blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. | Twenty participants completed 50 treatments and the change in local skin reaction (pre-treatment, during treatment and post-treatment) was evaluated at each visit. Number of Patients by Number of Treatments received: One Treatment: 4 Two Treatments :2 Three Treatments:14 | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | Baseline to Week 36 | Treatment visits | Treatment visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Average Change in Local Skin Reactions to Blue Light Treatment | Assessments of swelling, erythema, and flaking/scaling were conducted after each treatment and two days post-treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The average change in swelling, erythema and flaking/scaling after each treatment and two days post treatment were divided by the 50 total treatments to obtain the average value. | Twenty participants completed 50 treatments and the change in local skin reaction (pre-treatment, during treatment and post-treatment) was evaluated at each visit. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | Baseline to Week 36 | Treatment visits | Treatment visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Number of Participants Who Developed a Local Skin Reaction to Blue Light Treatment: Vesiculation/Pustulation, Erosion/Ulceration, Crusting and Hyperpigmentation | Assessments of vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration, and crusting were conducted immediately after each blue light treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The presence or absence of hyperpigmentation in the treatment area was also documented after each treatment visit. The total number of participants who developed a local skin reaction is documented. | Twenty participants completed 50 treatments and the change in local skin reaction (pre-treatment, during treatment and post-treatment) was evaluated at each visit. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to Week 36 | Treatment visits | Treatment visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Evaluation of any reported local or systemic events outside the treatment area and other than those specified under local skin reactions or PDT reactions. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline to Week 36 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 1 |
| 20 |
| 3 |
| 20 |
|
| Swelling of right hand | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Patient underwent mohs surgery on the right hand. This adverse event was not related to the study treatment. |
|
| Red spots | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D000596 |
| Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D003131 | Combined Modality Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D010789 | Phototherapy |
| D008027 | Light |
| D060733 | Electromagnetic Radiation |
| D055590 | Electromagnetic Phenomena |
| D060328 | Magnetic Phenomena |
| D055585 | Physical Phenomena |
| D055620 | Optical Phenomena |
| D011827 | Radiation |
| D011840 | Radiation, Nonionizing |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Hyperpigmentation |
|
| Measurements |
|---|
|
| Bleeding esophageal ulcer |
|