Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Stryker has made the decision to remove the Rhine Cervical Disc Replacement from their product portfolio. Stryker is not aware of any safety or effectiveness concerns and this decision is not related to poor patient outcomes or known device failures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Stryker Nordic | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels. The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device performance in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes; confirm device performance in terms of safety and to collect original data to be compared to published reports of the performance of comparable motion-sparing devices, as well as clinical outcomes of fusion devices.
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels ( C3-C7). The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device performance in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes; confirm device performance in terms of safety and to collect original data to be compared to published reports of the performance of comparable motion-sparing devices, as well as clinical outcomes of fusion devices. Device- and procedure-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and secondary surgeries will be monitored throughout. AEs will be characterized by severity, seriousness and relationship to device. Investigator reports of serious adverse events and any AE trends will be reviewed by a medical monitor.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhine Cervical Disc | Device | RHINE Cervical Disc |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neck Disability Index (NDI) change from baseline | Evaluation of the change in function will be scored using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at all time points compared to baseline (pre-operative). NDI is a subject-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 5, summed to a total and multiplied by 2 to get a score from 0 to 100. A 15 point change in NDI score compared with baseline (pre-operative score) will be used as the measure for a clinically significant change. | Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months |
| Radiographic Outcomes | Anteroposterior & Lateral ( or MRI at Pre-operative ) and Flexion and Extension x-rays will be taken at all time points. An independent radiologist will review and assess all radiographs including: range of motion, translation, intervertebral height, device height, device positioning/migration, heterotopic ossification and adjacent segment degeneration. | Pre-operative, 6-12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months |
| Number of Patients with Adverse Events (AEs) | AEs will be monitored throughout the study and characterized by seriousness, severity and relationship to the device and procedure, at a minimum. | Up to 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain: Neck, Right Arm, Left Arm, Worst arm Visual analog Scale Change form Baseline | The intensity of neck pain, right arm pain and left arm pain will be evaluated using a 100 mm VAS. The scale is measured from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain). The VAS will be scored at all time points and compared to baseline (pre-operative). A change of 15 mm is considered clinically significant. | Pre-operative, 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients eligible for the study enrollment will be skeletally mature patients undergoing reconstruction of the disc from C3 to C7 following discectomy at one or two contiguous levels for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height compared to adjacent levels. Patients should have failed at least 6 weeks of non-operative treatment or demonstrated progressive signs or symptoms despite non-operative treatment prior to implantation.
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19521015 | Background | MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930. | |
| 6450426 | Background | Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011843 | Radiculopathy |
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D055009 | Spondylosis |
| D054850 | Osteophyte |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Secondary Surgeries (Surgical Interventions) | Secondary surgeries will be described and will be classified as follows:
Surgeries unrelated to the spine will not be recorded as secondary surgeries but the adverse effect leading to the surgery will be recorded on an AE form and characterized as an 'inpatient hospitalization. | Up to 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months |
| Quality of life (SF-36) | SF-36 survey will be used to calculate overall, mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component scores at all post-op time-points compared to baseline (pre-operative) | Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months |
| Functional / Economic Impact - Prolo Scale | It is a 10-point scale consisting of only 2 questions evaluating the functional and economic status of patients. Scores 9-10 are considered excellent , scores less than 4 are considered poor. | Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months |
| Neurological function | Neurological function will be assessed pre-operatively and all post-op visits, unscheduled visits to assess an Adverse Event, by evaluating:
Maintenance or improvement in neurological function for this study is defined as: No clinically significant worsening at any post-operative time point that is permanent (compared to baseline or best neurological result post-operatively) | Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months |
| Global Assessment | Subject's self-reported assessment of improvement in their neck/arm problem since treatment. Scored on a 4-pt scale (much better, better, unchanged, worse) at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months. | 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months |
| Patient satisfaction | This will be based on subject's self-reported response to whether he/she is satisfied with the outcome of his/her neck surgery, scored on a 4-pt scale (strongly agrees, agrees, disagrees, strongly disagrees) at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months. | 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months |
| Patient treatment success (PTS) | Patients should have met all the of the following criteria:
| 24 months |
| Use of NSAIDS and other pain Medications. | Will document duration of prescribed post-operative use of NSAIDS (≤2 weeks, >2 weeks), and use (frequency and potency) of medications to manage c-spine condition at each follow-up interval compared with pre-operative level of management. | Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months |
| Estimated blood loss | The amount of blood loss over the entire length of the surgery, documented on the Anesthesia Record, will be captured. | During Operation |
| Surgery time | The length of surgical procedure from the initial incision to final closure will be captured from the Anesthesia Record. | During Operation |
| Length of hospital stay | The length of hospital stay from date of admission to date of discharge will be calculated. | At discharge, estimated average of 3-6 days after surgery |
| Surgeon satisfaction with instruments and surgical technique | 4-pt scale (very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, very unsatisfied) | At discharge, estimated average of 3-6 days after surgery |
| 12045520 | Background | Hagg O, Fritzell P, Oden A, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Simplifying outcome measurement: evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00014. |
| 17108833 | Background | Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, Korge A, Mayer HM. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2802-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5. |
| 12902954 | Background | McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):384-9. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010. |
| 19434431 | Background | Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM, Aubourg L, Vila T. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):841-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6. Epub 2009 May 12. |
| 15346999 | Background | Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Sep;1(2):143-54. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0143. |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D005096 | Exostoses |
| D015576 | Hyperostosis |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |