Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Negative results were obtained in all subjects that were analyzed (n=10)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Epidural analgesia is highly effective for labor pain relief and is widely chosen by pregnant patients. However, placement of the epidural needle can be challenging in pregnant patients due to lax tissue ligaments and edema so that the traditional loss of resistance method (LOR) used to find the space may be subtle leading to retries which may delay onset of analgesia as well as increase the risk of complications. The ability to transduce a pulsatile pressure waveform from epidural needles placed in non-laboring patients correlates highly with successful placement of the epidural needle. We wish to evaluate the efficacy of obtaining a pulsatile pressure waveform with correct epidural needle placement in laboring women.
Patients requesting epidural labor analgesia will be eligible for recruitment. After written informed consent is obtained, placement of monitors and aseptic technique, the 17G epidural needle will be placed using the loss of resistance (LOR) technique to air or saline at the lumbar level chosen by the anesthesiologist. When LOR occurs, the needle will then be filled with 2 mL NaCl 0.9% from that syringe and the pressure monitoring accessory will be connected to the needle. The second investigator will then connect the high pressure tubing to the acessory without touching it, and the pressure will be zeroed at level of the needle insertion. Pressure will then be transduced and the waveform, recorded. An epidural catheter (SIMS Portex) will then be passed through the needle and advanced 5 cm beyond the tip of the epidural needle. After securing the epidural catheter in place, the patient will be placed on the lateral position. The catheter will then be filled NaCl 0.9% from a syringe and a high-pressure tubing extension leveled at the spine level will be connected to the catheter and the pressure will be transduced and recorded. Data recorded will include 2 parameters: 1) The presence or absence of a pulsatile waveform, and 2) The actual pressure read at the epidural space, in mmHg. Those readings will be obtained in 2 distinct moments: at a " rest" state, meaning during an interval between contractions, and at an "active" state, during the first contraction after the epidural catheter is placed. A test dose of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine1:200.000 will then be given to exclude potential spinal or intravascular injection. After 3 minutes, a loading dose of 10mL of 0,125% bupivacaine will be given for labor analgesia and the presence or absence of a bilateral sensorial block at T10 or higher at 30 min will be assessed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidural Pressure Waveform | Experimental | Study Population:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epidural Pressure Waveform | Procedure | When loss of resistance occurs, a high-pressure tubing extension will be connected to the needle and the pressure will be transduced and the waveform, recorded. An epidural catheter will then be passed through the needle and connected to a high-pressure tubing extension and the pressure will be transduced and recorded. A test dose of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200.000 will then be given to exclude potential spinal or intravascular injection. After 3 minutes, a loading dose of 10 mL of 0,125% bupivacaine will be given for labor analgesia and the presence or absence of a bilateral sensorial block at T10 or higher at 30 min will be assessed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural Needle Insertion Success | Presence of a pulsatile pressure waveform at the epidural needle as a good predictor of a successful epidural block 30 min after local anesthetic injection | 30 min after loading dose |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural Pressure in mmHg | Epidural pressures during uterine contractions and in-between contractions in mmHg | 5 min after epidural needle insertion |
| Epidural Waveform at the Catheter | Presence or absence of an epidural waveform measured through the epidural catheter right after insertion |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Indu Singh, MD, FRCPC | University of Western Ontario, Schulich School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Hospital- LHSC | London | Ontario | N6A 5A5 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3355735 | Background | Narang VP, Linter SP. Failure of extradural blockade in obstetrics. A new hypothesis. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Mar;60(4):402-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.4.402. | |
| 11464353 | Background | Ghia Jn, Arora Sk, Castillo M, Mukherji Sk. Confirmation of location of epidural catheters by epidural pressure waveform and computed tomography cathetergram. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):337-41. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.23932. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Immediately after epidural catheter insertion |
| 17023284 | Background | Lennox PH, Umedaly HS, Grant RP, White SA, Fitzmaurice BG, Evans KG. A pulsatile pressure waveform is a sensitive marker for confirming the location of the thoracic epidural space. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006 Oct;20(5):659-63. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.02.022. Epub 2006 May 30. |
| 25172504 | Background | Gong Y, Shi H, Wu J, Labu D, Sun J, Zhong H, Li L, Xin X, Wang L, Wu L, Ma D. Pressure waveform-guided epidural catheter placement in comparison to the loss-of-resistance conventional method. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Aug;26(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Aug 27. |
| 16301268 | Background | de Medicis E, Tetrault JP, Martin R, Robichaud R, Laroche L. A prospective comparative study of two indirect methods for confirming the localization of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1830-1833. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184130.73634.BE. |
| 7294338 | Background | Messih MN. Epidural space pressures during pregnancy. Anaesthesia. 1981 Aug;36(8):775-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb08815.x. |
| 7198872 | Background | Sivakumaran C, Ramanathan S, Chalon J, Turndorf H. Uterine contractions and the spread of local anesthetics in the epidural space. Anesth Analg. 1982 Feb;61(2):127-9. |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |