Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The role of measuring translesional pressure gradients(TLG) in peripheral arterial disease lesions below the iliac artery is unclear. In a previous study the investigators demonstrated that a pressure wire can be effectively used to measure gradients in the femoropopliteal (FP) arterial bed showing good correlation between TLGs recorded with exercise ankle brachial index and walking impairment scores. However there is a no evidence that effectively modifying the gradient or having a high residual gradient after revascularization or just with medical therapy correlates with worse clinical outcomes.
This is a prospective, single center, observational clinical study to evaluate whether measurement of mean residual TLG at the time of angiography and/or immediately after endovascular revascularization are associated with clinically important outcomes in patients with claudication symptoms.
Prior to angiography they will be asked to complete an ankle brachial index evaluation, baseline six minute walk test and walking impairment questionnaire. Arterial access should be obtained in the contralateral common femoral artery to the symptomatic limb if feasible. Angiographic images are to be obtained, interpreted and clinical decisions regarding endovascular treatment are to be made per treating physician's discretion prior to obtaining translesional pressure gradients. In patients whose angiogram does not meet exclusion criteria and do not have a chronic total occlusion (CTO) a baseline TLG will be obtained. A 0.014" pressure wire/catheter to measure pressure will be inserted. After baseline calibration in the superficial femoral artery, the wire will be inserted past the narrowest lesion into the popliteal vessel. Intra-arterial adenosine 100-200 mcg will be given for hyperemia and measurements are to be recorded. If an intervention is planned, repeat measurements are to be obtained at the end of the procedure. If no intervention is planned this will be the residual or final TLG recorded. If baseline measurement are unable to obtained due to a CTO then only a post intervention residual TLG will be obtained and included in analysis. The operator will be blinded to the pre and post TLG measurements by turning the display monitor away from the procedure table and towards the recorder situated in the procedure room when measurements are being obtained.
Patients will follow up within two weeks post angiography for routine scheduled follow up and will obtain repeat ABI, WIQ, and six minute walk if they underwent revascularization. Treating physicians and study coordinators collecting these test measurements will be blinded to TLG measurements but not to angiography and treatment. Patients will again be evaluated at 6 months follow up with repeat ABI, WIQ and six minute walk.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| final TLG </=11 mmHg | includes all patients who have a final mean translesional gradient measurement (TLG) < 11 mmHg regardless if revascularization is done or not. |
| |
| final TLG > 11 mmHg | includes all patients who have a final mean translesional gradient measurement (TLG) > 11 mmHg regardless if revascularization is done or not. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| translesional gradient measurement | Procedure | Patients will be stratified into two groups based on the final mean translesional pressure gradient obtained in the femoropopliteal arterial bed after revascularization or just after angiography if no revascularization is done. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in six minute walk distance in meters at 6 months | Compare change in six minute walk distance at 2 weeks post angiography +/- revascularization to distance walked at 6 months +/- 15 days between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or \ | 6 months +/- 15 days after enrollment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change Walking Impairment Questionairre (WIQ)Score at 6 months | Compare change in WIQ scores from within 2 weeks post angiography +/- revascularization to WIQ score at 6 months +/- 15 days between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or \ |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary analysis evaluating correlation between change in 6 minute walk distance at 6 month and residual translesional gradients. | evaluate for linear correlation between change in six minute walk from baseline to 6 months to mean translesional gradient | 6 months |
| Secondary analysis evaluating correlation in change in WIQ score at 6 month and residual translesional gradients. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with claudication symptoms and femoropopliteal disease referred for peripheral angiography and possible revascularization.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA North Texas Health Care System | Dallas | Texas | 75216 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24753020 | Background | Klein AJ, Pinto DS, Gray BH, Jaff MR, White CJ, Drachman DE; Peripheral Vascular Disease Committee for the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. SCAI expert consensus statement for femoral-popliteal arterial intervention appropriate use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):529-38. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25504. Epub 2014 Jun 12. | |
| 21891804 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| D007383 | Intermittent Claudication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 months +/- 15 days after enrollment |
| Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 6 months | Change in ABI between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or \ | 6months +/- 15 days after enrollment |
| Change in six minute walk distance from baseline to within 2 weeks post revascularization | Change in six minute walk from baseline measurement in those patients that undergo revascularization to six minute walk distance checked within 2 weeks after revascularization. | baseline pre revascularization to two weeks post measurement |
| Change in WIQ score from baseline to within 2 weeks post revascularization | Change in WIQ score from baseline measurement in those patients that undergo revascularization to six minute walk distance checked within 2 weeks after revascularization. | baseline pre revascularization to two weeks post measurement |
| Need for repeat revascularization or amputation as assessed by rates of need in repeat revascularization or amputation | compare rates of need in repeat revascularization or amputation between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or \ | six months |
evaluate for linear correlation between change in WIQ from baseline to 6 months to mean translesional gradient |
| 6 months |
| Walker C. What is the role of translesional pressure gradient measurement in peripheral intervention? J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Sep;23(9):357. No abstract available. |
| 8043361 | Background | Archie JP Jr. Analysis and comparison of pressure gradients and ratios for predicting iliac stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994 May;8(3):271-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02018175. |
| 21891803 | Background | Banerjee S, Badhey N, Lichtenwalter C, Varghese C, Brilakis ES. Relationship of walking impairment and ankle-brachial index assessments with peripheral arterial translesional pressure gradients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Sep;23(9):352-6. |
| 17300406 | Background | Garcia LA, Carrozza JP Jr. Physiologic evaluation of translesion pressure gradients in peripheral arteries: comparison of pressure wire and catheter-derived measurements. J Interv Cardiol. 2007 Feb;20(1):63-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00213.x. |
| 17084261 | Background | De Bruyne B, Manoharan G, Pijls NH, Verhamme K, Madaric J, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Heyndrickx GR. Assessment of renal artery stenosis severity by pressure gradient measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 7;48(9):1851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.074. Epub 2006 Oct 17. |
| 12719196 | Background | Belch JJ, Topol EJ, Agnelli G, Bertrand M, Califf RM, Clement DL, Creager MA, Easton JD, Gavin JR 3rd, Greenland P, Hankey G, Hanrath P, Hirsch AT, Meyer J, Smith SC, Sullivan F, Weber MA; Prevention of Atherothrombotic Disease Network. Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):884-92. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.884. No abstract available. |
| 8816537 | Background | Tetteroo E, van Engelen AD, Spithoven JH, Tielbeek AV, van der Graaf Y, Mali WP. Stent placement after iliac angioplasty: comparison of hemodynamic and angiographic criteria. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):155-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816537. |
| D002318 |
| Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |