Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of the study is to compare electrocardiograms using ambulatory holter monitor with dry electrodes in a harness versus using an ambulatory holter with standard sticky electrodes (Red Dot) on monitored patients within the hospital. Patients will be simultaneously be hooked up to two ambulatory Holter monitors for the period of time to be not less than one hour. One holter will use standard electrodes in a standard electrode distribution. The second holter will use dry electrodes in a derived.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with Electrocardiograms | Any patient within the hospital either for procedure or for admission will be screened. Patients will be simultaneously be hooked up to two ambulatory Holter monitors for the period of time to be not less than one hour. One holter will use standard electrodes in a standard electrode distribution. The second holter will use dry electrodes in a derived; data will be collected for 1-6 hours. After the data is collected the Holters will be removed and the data will be downloaded into the reading software to be scanned. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrocardiogram holter | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arrythmia | quality of data obtained between harness and holter. Subjective evaluation: -Quality of the data will be rated on a 0 - 10 scale with 0 being unreadable and 10 being excellent | 15 minutes |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients within the hospital either for a procedure or for admission
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Cummings, MD | The University of Toledo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Toledo, Health Science Campus | Toledo | Ohio | 43606 | United States |
Not provided
recruitment was done in the hospital setting with patients that were admitted. start of enrollment was 3/26/2013-3/9/15.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patients With Electrocardiograms | Any patient within the hospital either for procedure or for admission will be screened. Patients will be simultaneously be hooked up to two ambulatory Holter monitors for the period of time to be not less than one hour. One holter will use standard electrodes in a standard electrode distribution. The second holter will use dry electrodes in a derived; data will be collected for 1-6 hours. After the data is collected the Holters will be removed and the data will be downloaded into the reading software to be scanned. Electrocardiogram holter |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Patients With Electrocardiograms | Any patient within the hospital either for procedure or for admission will be screened. Patients will be simultaneously be hooked up to two ambulatory Holter monitors for the period of time to be not less than one hour. One holter will use standard electrodes in a standard electrode distribution. The second holter will use dry electrodes in a derived; data will be collected for 1-6 hours. After the data is collected the Holters will be removed and the data will be downloaded into the reading software to be scanned. Electrocardiogram holter |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Arrythmia | quality of data obtained between harness and holter. Subjective evaluation: -Quality of the data will be rated on a 0 - 10 scale with 0 being unreadable and 10 being excellent | there were 13 females and 7 males, mean age of 74.65 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Quality rating | 15 minutes |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Patients With Electrocardiograms | Any patient within the hospital either for procedure or for admission will be screened. Patients will be simultaneously be hooked up to two ambulatory Holter monitors for the period of time to be not less than one hour. One holter will use standard electrodes in a standard electrode distribution. The second holter will use dry electrodes in a derived; data will be collected for 1-6 hours. After the data is collected the Holters will be removed and the data will be downloaded into the reading software to be scanned. Electrocardiogram holter |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saima Karim, DO | The University of Toledo | 419-383-3697 | Saima.Karim@utoledo.edu |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided