Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Population Health Research Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Proven treatments exist that improve quality of life and reduce the risk of repeat heart attacks or death amongst persons who have already had one heart attack. These treatments include medications and supervised cardiac rehabilitation programs. Unfortunately, research shows that many people who have had a heart attack do not stick with these treatments and therefore cannot benefit. This quality improvement research program seeks to understand the impact of interventions that could be readily implemented at scale by entire health systems or organizations wishing to improve adherence to proven treatments. Specifically, the trial will test whether providing Ontario-based patients (and their health professionals) with repeated educational reminders delivered via post and phone will help improve the use of medications or attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. During the project, the types of patients who are most responsive will be identified as will the most cost-effective strategy for delivering reminders. The trial team are partnering in this project with health system decision makers who have an interest in using the results to create standard operating procedures that could benefit patients across the province.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background: In patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary disease, guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation services and the long-term use of cardiac medications to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Adherence to these recommendations substantially reduces morbidity and mortality post-MI. However, for a variety of patient, provider, and system-level reasons, adherence to cardiac medications declines to approximately 50% by 12 months. Likewise, only 30-40% of patients participate in cardiac rehabilitation. Thus, interventions to increase secondary prevention treatment adherence are urgently needed.
The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario (CCN) holds a registry of all patients in the province who have a coronary angiography. The registry has been used to identify gaps in care and to plan health system strategies for high-risk patients. More recently, a pilot trial was conducted in Hamilton by the trial team using data in the registry to send recurrent postal reminders regarding the importance of treatment adherence to patients, their pharmacists, and family physicians. A similar program is underway in Ottawa using automated phone calls with interactive voice response and nurse follow up. These interventions both have the potential to address known determinants of adherence. The CCN, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Health Quality Ontario, and other stakeholders across Ontario are interested in evaluating the comparative effectiveness and costs of these interventions.
Research Questions: The research objectives were formed by the decision makers' need to evaluate whether and in what format to sustain and/or scale-up post-MI educational reminder interventions:
i. Can educational reminders delivered via post and/or using interactive voice response with personalized telephone follow up improve secondary prevention treatment adherence post-MI?
ii. How do different approaches to improve adherence to these recommendations compare in terms of clinical effectiveness and costs?
iii. Which subgroups are more/less likely to respond to reminders?
Research Approach: This is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. Patients in cardiac centres throughout Ontario who undergo a coronary angiography will be provided a letter of information explaining the study appended to the standard CCN letter of information. CCN will identify eligible patients (those with substantial coronary artery disease who survive their initial hospitalization post-MI) and provide the patient list back to the cardiac centre. A representative at the centre will securely send this list to the Population Health Research Institute in Hamilton. Patients will be randomized by the Population Health Research Institute team to one of three arms:
Patient self-report and administrative data will be used to assess outcomes 12 months post-MI. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The primary outcome is adherence to guideline-recommended treatments. Secondary outcomes include health services utilization (including outpatient visits to interventional cardiology), recurrent cardiovascular events, and mortality. During the trial, a theory-informed process questionnaire will be administered to a random sub-sample. An economic evaluation will be conducted from the perspective of the public health care payer.
Implications: This project has the potential to lead to improvements in care for patients at high cardiovascular risk as well as provide generalizable insights regarding how to optimize interventions to improve adherence. Further, it has the potential to inform how other health databases could be used to improve health system performance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No Intervention | Usual care (no intervention) | |
| Usual care + letters | Experimental | Usual care plus a series of postal educational reminders (including information for patients to share with clinicians) |
|
| Usual care + letters + automated calls | Experimental | Usual care plus a series of postal educational reminders (including information for patients to share with clinicians), plus automated reminder interactive voice response phone calls to identify patients at being at risk for non-adherence and a trained lay health worker to provide additional support and navigation for such patients via telephone. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual care + letters | Behavioral | A series of five postal educational reminders sent on behalf of each hospital's interventional cardiology team to the patient approximately 4, 8, 20, 32, and 44 weeks post-MI procedure, with an insert for the family physician and pharmacist at approximately 4 and 8 weeks post-MI procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Medication adherence | Number of cardiac medication classes with no missed tablets in last week (ordinal) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Cardiac rehabilitation completion | Patient attended at least one of the rehabilitation components and formal re-assessment at the conclusion of the program (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac rehabilitation attendance | Participation, defined as attending at least one exercise session following enrolment assessment (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Quality of life |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Noah Ivers | Women's College Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| John-David Schwalm | Population Health Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Madhu Natarajan | Population Health Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Jeremy Grimshaw | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21159479 | Background | El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, AlMahmeed W, Sulaiman K, AlNabti A, Singh R, Al Suwaidi J. Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicenter registry. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Dec 14. | |
| 35596020 | Derived | McCleary N, Ivers NM, Schwalm JD, Witteman HO, Taljaard M, Desveaux L, Bouck Z, Grace SL, Grimshaw JM, Presseau J. Impacts of two behavior change interventions on determinants of medication adherence: process evaluation applying the health action process approach and habit theory alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2022 Oct;45(5):659-673. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00327-0. Epub 2022 May 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009203 | Myocardial Infarction |
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Usual care + letters + automated calls | Behavioral | A series of five postal educational reminders as per the usual care + letters arm plus interactive voice response phone calls to the patient delivered approximately 2 weeks after the letters, as well as personalized telephone follow up by trained lay health workers for patients identified by the interactive voice response system as non-adherent. The automated algorithm is designed to identify patients who are non-adherent and who may benefit from personalized educational phone call and/or system navigation support by the lay health worker. Lay health workers will not provide clinical advice. |
|
Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 [patient report]
| 12 months post-MI |
| Treatment discussion | Adherence to both medication and exercise discussed with providers in last three months (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Smoking status | Point-prevalence, smoking any cigarettes in last three months (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication persistence | Active prescription for ALL recommended medications (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication persistence | Active prescription for EACH recommended medication (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | No missed tablets in last week for ANY recommended medication (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | No missed tablets in last month for any recommended medication (dichotomous)[patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | No missed tablets in last month for ANY recommended medication (dichotomous) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | Number of missed tablets in last week for EACH recommended medication (continuous, 0 to 28) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | Number of missed tablets in last month for each recommended medication (continuous, 0 to 28) [patient report] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | Medication possession ratio > 80% for ALL recommended medications in those 65+ (dichotomous) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | Medication possession ratio > 80% for EACH of the recommended medications in those 65+ (dichotomous) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | Mean medication possession ratio for ALL recommended medications in those 65+ (continuous, 0 to 100) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Medication adherence | Mean medication possession ratio for EACH recommended medication in those 65+ (continuous, 0 to 100) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Cardiovascular event | Coronary bypass surgery or stent or repeat MI (dichotomous) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Mortality | Death during follow-up [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Health utilization | Outpatient visits (count) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Health utilization | Emergency Room visits not leading to admission (count) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| Health utilization | Hospitalizations (count) [administrative data] | 12 months post-MI |
| 32883724 | Derived | Desveaux L, Saragosa M, Russell K, McCleary N, Presseau J, Witteman HO, Schwalm JD, Ivers NM. How and why a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence post-MI worked for some (and could work better for others): an outcome-driven qualitative process evaluation. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e036750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036750. |
| 32522811 | Derived | Ivers NM, Schwalm JD, Bouck Z, McCready T, Taljaard M, Grace SL, Cunningham J, Bosiak B, Presseau J, Witteman HO, Suskin N, Wijeysundera HC, Atzema C, Bhatia RS, Natarajan M, Grimshaw JM. Interventions supporting long term adherence and decreasing cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction (ISLAND): pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020 Jun 10;369:m1731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1731. |
| D007238 |
| Infarction |
| D007511 | Ischemia |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009336 | Necrosis |