Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Literature has shown that hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens are efficacious in patients with complicated bone metastases and have a low potential for severe treatment-related toxicities. There is a clear need for hypofractionated schedules in the complicated bone metastases population, especially when considering the overarching aim of palliative radiotherapy and the clinical features of this patient population. As well, current research examining hypofractionated approaches in bone metastases patients with impending or pathologic fractures, neuropathic pain or accompanying soft tissue masses has been markedly scarce.
In response the the already commented on, the purpose of this one armed, phase II trial is to determine the efficacy and safety profile of a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen, 16 Gy in 2 fractions with an interval of one week, for the palliation of complicated bone metastases in patients with poor performance status.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy in bone metastases | Experimental | The purpose of this one armed, phase II trial is to determine the efficacy and safety profile of a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen, 16 Gy in 2 fractions with an interval of one week, for the palliation of complicated bone metastases in patients with poor performance status. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy | Radiation | Hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen, 16 Gy in 2 fractions in complicated bone metastases in patients with poor performance status |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall pain response at the site of treatment, which will be measured at two months post-treatment. Pain response will be measured using the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints Pain Response Categories. | The general follow up will finish 1 year after each patient inclusion | 2 months after the end of the second radiotherapy fraction |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ PAL-15 and EORTC QLQ-BM22 | Quality of life assessed by these 2 questionnaries will follow composite information | General follow up will be 1 year after each patient inclusion |
| Side effects of Radiotherapy. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maurício F Silva, PhD | Medical Doctor at Radiation Oncology Unit | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISCMPA | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | 90000 | Brazil | ||
| ICESP |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Radiotherapy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Nausea and vomiting, pain flare, skin rash, esophagitis, mucositis, diarrhea, spinal cord/cauda equina compression, pathologic fracture, re-irradiation rate).
| General follow up will be 1 year after each patient inclusion |
| São Paulo |
| São Paulo |
| Brazil |
| Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| S. Maria Hospital | Terni | Italy |