Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the VisAbility Micro Insert System for the improvement of near visual acuity in presbyopic patients.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the VisAbility Implant System (VIS) for the improvement of near visual acuity in presbyopic patients. This is a prospective clinical study that enrolled a total of 360 subjects ranging in age between 45 and 60 years of age at 13 clinical sites. Subjects were implanted with the VisAbility Implant model SGP-046 in the primary eye and then in the fellow eye no sooner than 14 days later. Subjects were examined at one day, one week and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively.
The study also included a 60 subject randomized controlled sub-study at 3 investigation sites. Sub-study subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a surgery group or a control group. Subjects randomized to the surgery group underwent surgery and were followed for 24 months in the same manner as the larger non-randomized surgical group. Subjects randomized to the control group were observed for 6 months, and were then eligible to undergo surgery after completion of this 6-month observation period.
The primary endpoint is the achievement of distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) of Snellen equivalent 20/40 or better (at 40 cm) and at least 10 letters (ETDRS) improvement in DCNVA in the primary eye.
This endpoint is evaluated against two objectives, a) 75% or more of primary eyes achieve the effectiveness endpoint at 12 months postoperative and b) the percentage of primary eyes achieving the effectiveness endpoint at 6 months postoperative (6-month responder rate) is higher than the percentage in the randomized control group.
Safety data analyses were performed and separate summaries are provided for primary and all eyes. Descriptive statistics on the following attributes are provided for; BCDVA, IOP, Slit lamp findings, Fundus exam findings, and Adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implantation-Non-Randomized | Experimental | Subjects are not participants in the randomized sub-study. VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eye(s) after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. |
|
| Implantation-Randomized | Experimental | Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study. Subjects were randomized to the Immediate Treatment group. VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eyes. Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. |
|
| Deferred Implantation-Randomized | No Intervention | Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized to the Deferred Treatment group are observed for 6 months. Upon completion of the observation follow-up, subjects can opt to have VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eye(s) and become part of the overall study experimental group. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VisAbility Micro Insert | Device | Subjects are implanted with the VisAbility Micro Insert (Model SGP-046) and followed for 24 months. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Primary Eyes With Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) to 20/40 or Better and Gain of At Least 10 Letters. | Measurement of the Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at 40 centimeters achieving 20/40 or better and Gain of At Least 10 Letters at 24 months for the primary eye. | From date of baseline measurement until the date of study withdrawal or study completion, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Primary Eyes With DCNVA 20/40 of Better and Gain of 10 Letters More at 6 Months for the Randomized Substudy | The randomized surgery group is defined as successful if the percentage of primary eyes achieving Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at 40 centimeters of 20/40 of Better and Gain of 10 Letters more at 6 months postoperative (i.e. 6-month responder rate) is higher than the percentage in the randomized control group. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Selene Burke, O.D. | V.P. Clinical Affairs | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Vision | Orange | California | 92868 | United States | ||
| Gordon Weiss Vision Institute |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Once determined eligible and informed consent was obtained, both eyes were enrolled in the study. Per protocol, primary outcome analysis must be performed on the primary eye only and the primary eye is therefore the unit of analysis. Fellow eyes were followed for safety outcomes and summarized separately.
The prospective, multicenter clinical trial of the VisAbility micro insert was conducted at 13 clinical sites. All recruitment evaluations were performed at the Principal Investigator's sites and subjects were screened for eligibility. If inclusion/exclusion criteria were met, informed consent was obtained and the subject was enrolled in the study.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Implantation-Non-Randomzied | Subjects are not participants in the randomized sub-study. VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eye(s) after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. VisAbility Micro Insert: Subjects are implanted with the VisAbility Micro Insert (Model SGP-046) and followed for 24 months. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation (Deferred Implantation) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 3, 2015 |
Not provided
A non-randomized arm was run in parallel with a randomized sub-study consisting of 2 arms; Immediate Treatment and Deferred Treatment. Upon completion of the 6 month observation period, the Deferred Treatment group then crosses over upon implantation to become part of the overall study group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| From date of randomization until the date of study withdrawal or sub-study completion at 6 months, whichever came first. |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92122 |
| United States |
| Aloha Laser Vision | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96814 | United States |
| The Midwest Center for Sight | Des Plaines | Illinois | 60016 | United States |
| Eye Surgeons Of Indiana PC | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46256 | United States |
| Eye Care Institute | Louisville | Kentucky | 40206 | United States |
| Chu Vision Institute | Bloomington | Minnesota | 55420 | United States |
| South Shore Eye Care LLP | Wantagh | New York | 11793 | United States |
| South Shore Eye Care, LLP | Wantagh | New York | 11793 | United States |
| Physicians Protocol | Greensboro | North Carolina | 27401 | United States |
| Comprehensive EyeCare of Central Ohio | Westerville | Ohio | 43082 | United States |
| Bucci Laser Vision | Wilkes-Barre | Pennsylvania | 18702 | United States |
| Key Whitman Eye Center | Dallas | Texas | 75242 | United States |
| Braverman-Terry-Oei Eye Associates | San Antonio | Texas | 78212 | United States |
| Implantation-Randomized |
Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study. Subjects were randomized to the Immediate Treatment group. VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eyes. Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. VisAbility Micro Insert: Subjects are implanted with the VisAbility Micro Insert (Model SGP-046) and followed for 24 months. |
| FG002 | Deferred Implantion-Randomized | Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized to the Deferred Treatment group are observed for 6 months. Upon completion of the observation follow-up, subjects can opt to have VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eye(s) and become part of the overall study experimental group. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Implantation- Nonrandomized & Randomized |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Implantation-Non-Randomized | Subjects are not participants in the randomized sub-study. VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eye(s) after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. VisAbility Micro Insert: Subjects are implanted with the VisAbility Micro Insert (Model SGP-046) and followed for 24 months. |
| BG001 | Implantation-Randomized | Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study. Subjects were randomized to the Immediate Treatment group. VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eyes. Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. VisAbility Micro Insert: Subjects are implanted with the VisAbility Micro Insert (Model SGP-046) and followed for 24 months. |
| BG002 | Deferred Implantion-Randomized | Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized to the Deferred Treatment group are observed for 6 months. Upon completion of the observation follow-up, subjects can opt to have VisAbility micro inserts surgically implanted in the eye(s) and become part of the overall study experimental group. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| DCNVA 20/40 or Better (at baseline) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Primary Eyes With Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) to 20/40 or Better and Gain of At Least 10 Letters. | Measurement of the Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at 40 centimeters achieving 20/40 or better and Gain of At Least 10 Letters at 24 months for the primary eye. | Explanted primary eyes were analyzed as failures. Data for primary eyes that missed the 24 month visit, were lost to follow-up, or withdrew consent prior to the 24 month visit were not imputed. Per protocol, primary outcome analysis must be performed on the primary eye only. Fellow eye data is used for safety outcomes and summarized separately. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From date of baseline measurement until the date of study withdrawal or study completion, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years. |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Primary Eyes With DCNVA 20/40 of Better and Gain of 10 Letters More at 6 Months for the Randomized Substudy | The randomized surgery group is defined as successful if the percentage of primary eyes achieving Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at 40 centimeters of 20/40 of Better and Gain of 10 Letters more at 6 months postoperative (i.e. 6-month responder rate) is higher than the percentage in the randomized control group. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From date of randomization until the date of study withdrawal or sub-study completion at 6 months, whichever came first. |
|
Adverse event reporting continued through 24 months.
An Adverse Event ("AE") is any untoward sign, symptom or disease observed during the course of the study regardless of the suspected cause. Conditions or diseases that are pre-existing or chronic but stable are not Adverse Events. Changes in pre-existing or chronic conditions or diseases that are consistent with natural disease progression are not Adverse Events.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | VisAbility Micro Insert Implantation - Single Arm | For post-implant safety analysis, the Implantation-Non Randomized, Implantation-Randomized, and Deferred Implantation-Randomized arms were combined into (one) safety cohort (306 subjects + 26 subjects + 28 subjects, respectively), per protocol. All 360 implanted subjects that received the VisAbility Micro Insert implantation were followed for 24 months and were not analyzed separately. I.e. Subjects who participated in the randomized sub-study crossed over into a single (safety) arm at the time of implantation. For safety analysis and adverse event reporting, all implanted subjects were considered one cohort as there was no difference in treatment nor follow-up after VisAbility Micro Insert implantation. | 0 | 360 | 4 | 360 | 170 | 360 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serious Ocular Adverse Events | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment | Any Serious Ocular Adverse Events |
|
| Serious Non-Ocular Adverse Events | General disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment | Any Serious Non-Ocular Adverse Events |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Acuity | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lid | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cornea/Conjunctiva | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iris/Pupil | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anterior Chamber | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lens | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sclera (Intraoperative Events) | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intraocular Pressure | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fundus/Posterior Pole | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Secondary Surgical Intervention | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Allergic Reactions to Medications | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Other | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The Sponsor encourages publication and presentation of the safety and effectiveness results upon completion of the study. Per the established agreement, the Principal Investigators will work with the Sponsor, in good faith, to ensure all confidential and proprietary information is redacted.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Regulatory & Quality | Refocus Group, Inc. | 214-368-0200 | 431 | lstewart@refocus-group.com |
| Oct 15, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011305 | Presbyopia |
| D009216 | Myopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|