Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2015-00011 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| RU021407I | Other Identifier | Academic and Community Cancer Research United | |
| P30CA015083 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized phase II trial studies how well lower-dose compared to standard dose regorafenib works in treating patients with colorectal cancer that has spread from the primary site (place where it started) to other places in the body and does not respond to treatment. Regorafenib may stop the growth of colorectal cancer by blocking the growth of new blood vessels necessary for tumor growth and by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether lower-dose or standard dose regorafenib is more effective in treating patients with colorectal cancer. Clobetasol propionate is a steroid cream that is commonly used to treat a variety of skin conditions and may help prevent hand-foot skin reactions in patients receiving regorafenib.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate the proportion of patients who complete 2 cycles of protocol treatment and initiate cycle 3 in arm A (pooled arm A1 and A2) and arm B (pooled arm B1 and B2).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate outcome measures for efficacy in each arm including progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS).
II. Compare between arms the cumulative dose and dose intensity received within the first two cycles.
III. Evaluate the proportion of patients in each arm that exhibit grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) and/or fatigue, and make comparisons between regorafenib dosing strategies and pre-emptive versus (vs.) reactive strategies to address PPES.
IV. Compare quality of life (QOL) between treatment arms (regorafenib dosing strategies and preemptive vs. reactive PPES strategies) as measured by the Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS)14, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA) questionnaires.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate and compare trough minimum concentration (Cmin) pharmacokinetics (PK) during the first 2 treatment cycles for regorafenib and active metabolites M2, M5 between the low dose (dose escalation) and the standard dose cohorts, and correlate with toxicity profile.
II. Evaluate the correlation between PK parameters and tumor response/stable disease after the first two cycles.
III. Evaluate the correlation between PK parameters and PFS and OS. IV. Evaluate if trough (Cmin) concentrations are associated with patient-specific factors (such as ? but not limited to ? age and concomitant medications).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.
ARM A1: Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO once daily (QD) on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate given topically twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks, beginning on day 1 of regorafenib.
ARM A2: Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO as in Arm A1 and reactive clobetasol propionate given topically BID beginning on day 1 per physician discretion upon occurrence of PPES grade >= 1.
ARM B1: Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO QD on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A1.
ARM B2: Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO as in Arm B1 and reactive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A2.
In all arms, courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 2-6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A1 (lower-dose regorafenib, pre-emptive clobetasol) | Experimental | Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO QD on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate given topically BID for 12 weeks, beginning on day 1 of regorafenib. |
|
| Arm A2 (lower-dose regorafenib, reactive clobetasol) | Experimental | Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO as in Arm A1 and reactive clobetasol propionate given topically BID beginning on day 1 per physician discretion upon occurrence of PPES grade >= 1. |
|
| Arm B1 (standard dose regorafenib, pre-emptive clobetasol) | Experimental | Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO QD on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A1. |
|
| Arm B2 (standard dose regorafenib, reactive clobetasol) | Experimental | Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO as in Arm B1 and reactive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A2. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clobetasol Propionate | Drug | Given topically |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3 | Fisher exact test will be used to detect a difference course 3 between arms (starting low dose [pooled arm A1 and A2] versus [vs.] standard dose [pooled arm B1 and B2]). The proportion of patients who complete 2 courses of protocol treatment and initiate course 3 will be computed by arm with its 95% confidence interval using exact method. | At 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments. | Time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters of Regorafenib Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry | After quantitation, the average trough concentration, calculated from all available data, will be calculated. This average trough concentration will be correlated with toxicity and efficacy endpoints. Further descriptive characteristics of the pharmacokinetics will also be calculated, an example includes (but is not limited to) within-patient variability in the trough concentrations pharmacokinetic parameters will also be calculated, both overall and within courses, as a ratio of the maximum:minimum value. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Histological or cytological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum
Advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer with no curative options available and progression on previous standard therapy, including an EGFR inhibitor if KRAS wild-type
Measurable or non-measurable disease
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1
Life expectancy of >= 3 months
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1500/mm^3 (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Platelet count > 100,000/mm^3 (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Hemoglobin > 9.0 g/dL (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate amino-transferase (AST) =< 2.5 x ULN (=< 5 x ULN for subjects with liver involvement of their cancer) (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Serum creatinine =< 1.5 x ULN (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
International normalized ratio (INR)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT) =< 1.5 x ULN (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Alkaline phosphatase limit =< 2.5 x ULN (=< 5 x ULN for patients with liver involvement of their cancer) (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
Negative serum pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to randomization, for women of childbearing potential only; note: post-menopausal women (defined as no menses for at least 1 year) and surgically sterilized women are not required to undergo a pregnancy test; the definition of adequate contraception will be based on the judgment of the investigator
Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
Provide informed written consent
Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study)
Willing to provide blood samples for correlative research and banking purposes
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior treatment with regorafenib
Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury =< 28 days prior to randomization
Congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2
Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest), new-onset angina (begun within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction less than 6 months prior to randomization
Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy; Note: pace makers, beta blockers, or digoxin are permitted
Uncontrolled hypertension; (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure > 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management)
History of or current pheochromocytoma
Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism =< 6 months prior to randomization
Ongoing infection > grade 2 National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Known history of chronic hepatitis B or C
Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication
Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the patient is > 6 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks of randomization and is clinically stable with respect to the tumor at the time of randomization; note: patient must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper (chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies)
History of organ allograft (including corneal transplant)
Evidence or history of bleeding diathesis or any hemorrhage or bleeding event > CTCAE grade 3 =< 4 weeks prior to randomization
Non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
Renal failure requiring hematological (hemo-) or peritoneal dialysis
Dehydration CTCAE (version 4.0) grade >= 1
Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient?s participation in the study or evaluation of the study results
Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or excipients in the formulation
Interstitial lung disease with ongoing signs and symptoms at the time of informed consent
Persistent proteinuria of Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or higher (>= 3.5 g/24 hours [hrs])
Patients unable to swallow oral medications
Any malabsorption condition
Unresolved toxicity greater than CTCAE (version 4.0) grade 1 attributed to any prior therapy/procedure excluding alopecia and oxaliplatin induced neurotoxicity =< grade 2
Albumin levels < 2.5 g/dl
Any of the following:
Pregnant women
Nursing women
Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
Immunocompromised patients and patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and currently receiving antiretroviral therapy; NOTE: patients known to be HIV positive, but without clinical evidence of an immunocompromised state, are eligible for this trial
Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm
Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from colorectal cancer within 3 years prior to randomization EXCEPT for curatively treated cervical cancer in situ, non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumors (Ta [non-invasive tumor], Tis [carcinoma in situ] and T1 [tumor invades lamina propria]); note: all cancer treatments for cancers that were distinct in a primary site other than colorectal must be completed at least 3 years prior to randomization (i.e., signature date of the informed consent form)
Pleural effusion or ascites that causes respiratory compromise (>= CTCAE version 4.0 grade 2 dyspnea)
Concurrent anti-cancer therapy =< 4 weeks from registration (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, or tumor embolization)
Current use of clobetasol propionate
Use of any herbal remedy (e.g. St. John?s wort [Hypericum perforatum])
Patients unable to ambulate or who have amputations or paralysis of any extremity
History of contact dermatitis to clobetasol propionate or similarly fluorinated steroids or other steroids with the propionate ester
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tanios Bekaii-Saab | Academic and Community Cancer Research United | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic Hospital | Phoenix | Arizona | 85054 | United States | ||
| Mayo Clinic in Arizona |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31262657 | Derived | Bekaii-Saab TS, Ou FS, Ahn DH, Boland PM, Ciombor KK, Heying EN, Dockter TJ, Jacobs NL, Pasche BC, Cleary JM, Meyers JP, Desnoyers RJ, McCune JS, Pedersen K, Barzi A, Chiorean EG, Sloan J, Lacouture ME, Lenz HJ, Grothey A. Regorafenib dose-optimisation in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (ReDOS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Aug;20(8):1070-1082. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30272-4. Epub 2019 Jun 28. | |
| 28712102 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 16, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Pharmacological Study | Other | Correlative studies |
|
| Quality-of-Life Assessment | Other | Ancillary studies |
|
|
| Regorafenib | Drug | Given PO |
|
|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments. | Time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed up to 2 years |
| Time to Progression (TTP) | TTP is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments. | Time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed up to 2 years |
| Cumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles | Will be summarized with descriptive statistics and compared between regorafenib arms (A vs. B). | Up to 8 weeks |
| Dose Intensity of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles as Measured by the Percentage of Planned Dose Received | Dose intensity of regorafenib received by patients in the first two cycles as measured by the percentage (%) of planned dose received | Up to 8 weeks |
| Proportion of Patients Overall and Within Each Arm Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS) | Will be computed with 95% confidence intervals. | 2 years |
| Quality of Life (QOL) (According to the HFS14 Total Score) | Patients will be descriptively compared between treatment arms and between HFS treatment strategies (pre-emptive vs. reactive) according to self-reported outcomes given on the HFS14 questionnaire. Results from the course 1 and 2 HSF14 questionnaires will also be summarized descriptively as they relate to the pre-emptive versus reactive palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) strategies. Total HFS-14 score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and adjusting to 100 by applying a rule of three. Total scores have a range of 2-100, with the higher the score, the greater the QoL impairment. | 8 weeks |
| Changes in QOL (According to the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment [LASA] Questionnaire) | Changes in QOL (according to the LASA questionnaire as measured by the overall QOL question) from baseline will be compared between the treatment arms using the Kruskal-Wallis test. | Baseline to 8 weeks |
| Baseline, prior to treatment, days 7, 14, and 21 prior to treatment (course 1), and days 1 and 21 prior to treatment (course 2) |
| Scottsdale |
| Arizona |
| 85259 |
| United States |
| USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| Illinois CancerCare-Peoria | Peoria | Illinois | 61615 | United States |
| Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium | South Bend | Indiana | 46628 | United States |
| Siouxland Regional Cancer Center | Sioux City | Iowa | 51101 | United States |
| Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium | Saint Louis Park | Minnesota | 55416 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium | Omaha | Nebraska | 68106 | United States |
| University of Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York | 14263 | United States |
| Hematology Oncology Associates of Central New York-East Syracuse | East Syracuse | New York | 13057 | United States |
| Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Toledo Clinic Cancer Centers-Toledo | Toledo | Ohio | 43623 | United States |
| Geisinger Medical Center | Danville | Pennsylvania | 17822 | United States |
| Wellmont Medical Associates Oncology and Hematology-Kingsport | Kingsport | Tennessee | 37660 | United States |
| University of Washington Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| Saint Vincent Hospital Cancer Center Green Bay | Green Bay | Wisconsin | 54301 | United States |
| Marshfield Clinic | Marshfield | Wisconsin | 54449 | United States |
| Weinberg BA, Hartley ML, Salem ME. Precision Medicine in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Relevant Carcinogenic Pathways and Targets-PART 2: Approaches Beyond First-Line Therapy, and Novel Biologic Agents Under Investigation. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Jul 15;31(7):573-80. |
| FG001 | Arm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
| FG002 | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| FG003 | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| BG001 | Arm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
| BG002 | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| BG003 | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| ECOG Performance Status | Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS Scale: 0)Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1)Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2)Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3)Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4)Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3 | Fisher exact test will be used to detect a difference course 3 between arms (starting low dose [pooled arm A1 and A2] versus [vs.] standard dose [pooled arm B1 and B2]). The proportion of patients who complete 2 courses of protocol treatment and initiate course 3 will be computed by arm with its 95% confidence interval using exact method. | The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of patients | At 8 weeks |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments. | The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)). | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed up to 2 years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Progression (TTP) | TTP is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments. | The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)). | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed up to 2 years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Cumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles | Will be summarized with descriptive statistics and compared between regorafenib arms (A vs. B). | The data for the pre-emptive & reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies ((Arms A1 + A2) versus (Arms B1 + B2)). There are patients off-protocol treatment during cycle 1; therefore, we do not have cycle 2 dosing information for those patients who are off-protocol treatment during cycle 1. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/day | Up to 8 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Dose Intensity of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles as Measured by the Percentage of Planned Dose Received | Dose intensity of regorafenib received by patients in the first two cycles as measured by the percentage (%) of planned dose received | The data for the pre-emptive & reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies ((Arms A1 + A2) versus (Arms B1 + B2)). | Posted | Median | Standard Deviation | percentage of planned dose received | Up to 8 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Overall and Within Each Arm Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS) | Will be computed with 95% confidence intervals. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | 2 years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Quality of Life (QOL) (According to the HFS14 Total Score) | Patients will be descriptively compared between treatment arms and between HFS treatment strategies (pre-emptive vs. reactive) according to self-reported outcomes given on the HFS14 questionnaire. Results from the course 1 and 2 HSF14 questionnaires will also be summarized descriptively as they relate to the pre-emptive versus reactive palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) strategies. Total HFS-14 score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and adjusting to 100 by applying a rule of three. Total scores have a range of 2-100, with the higher the score, the greater the QoL impairment. | Only patients that completed a post-baseline HFS14 assessment were included in analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 8 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Changes in QOL (According to the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment [LASA] Questionnaire) | Changes in QOL (according to the LASA questionnaire as measured by the overall QOL question) from baseline will be compared between the treatment arms using the Kruskal-Wallis test. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LASA overall score change from baseline | Baseline to 8 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters of Regorafenib Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry | After quantitation, the average trough concentration, calculated from all available data, will be calculated. This average trough concentration will be correlated with toxicity and efficacy endpoints. Further descriptive characteristics of the pharmacokinetics will also be calculated, an example includes (but is not limited to) within-patient variability in the trough concentrations pharmacokinetic parameters will also be calculated, both overall and within courses, as a ratio of the maximum:minimum value. | Not Posted | Baseline, prior to treatment, days 7, 14, and 21 prior to treatment (course 1), and days 1 and 21 prior to treatment (course 2) | Participants |
Adverse events were assessed during the active monitoring phase (weekly during Cycles 1 and 2, then every 4 weeks until progression); up to 2 years. The total study duration (accrual and follow-up) is expected to be approximately 2 years.
Each CTCAE term is a representation of a specific event used for medical documentation & analysis & is a single MedDRA Lowest Level Term (LLT). All graded AEs are reported for non-cancel patients. Serious AE (SAE) reports may include any secondary serious or non-serious events considered related to the primary event (the reason for filing an expedited report); collectively, these events are referred to as Expedited AEs, & appear in the SAE table.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). | 0 | 28 | 4 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| EG001 | Arm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). | 3 | 26 | 10 | 26 | 24 | 26 |
| EG002 | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). | 3 | 33 | 10 | 33 | 31 | 33 |
| EG003 | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). | 2 | 30 | 10 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death NOS | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations - Other, specify | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| INR increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigations - Other, specify | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) - Other, specify | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischemic attacks | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusion | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Adult respiratory distress syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash maculo-papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thromboembolic event | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders - Other, specify | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Watering eyes | Eye disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal disorders - Other, specify | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucositis oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomach pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Edema limbs | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fever | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General disorders and administration site conditions - Other, specify | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatobiliary disorders - Other, specify | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigations - Other, specify | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight loss | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypermagnesemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophosphatemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders - Other, specify | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other, specify | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myositis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cognitive disturbance | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paresthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral motor neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychiatric disorders - Other, specify | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary frequency | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atelectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiccups | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hoarseness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleuritic pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Productive cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nail discoloration | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain of skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash maculo-papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other, specify | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hot flashes | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thromboembolic event | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 12 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanios Bekaii-Saab, M.D. | Mayo Clinic Arizona | 507/266-0800 | Bekaii-Saab.Tanios@mayo.edu |
| May 16, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003110 | Colonic Neoplasms |
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002990 | Clobetasol |
| C559147 | regorafenib |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001623 | Betamethasone |
| D013259 | Steroids, Fluorinated |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| OG003 | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
|
|
In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy).
| OG002 | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| OG003 | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
|
|
| OG002 | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). |
| OG003 | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
|
|
|