The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, nab-paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced disease progression at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatment. In the maintenance phase, participants received best supportive care.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.

The induction phase of the study consisted of four or six cycles; atezolizumab and carboplatin were administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Nab-Paclitaxel was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. The Day 1 order of drug administration was as follows: atezolizumab, then nab-paclitaxel, then carboplatin. Participants who experienced no further clinical benefit at any time during the induction phase discontinued all study treatments. In the absence of the above criteria, after the 4- or 6-cycle induction phase, participants began maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was continued as long as there was clinical benefit to the participant.