Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional Radiotherapy With Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients With Bone Metastases - VERTICAL Study

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Radiotherapy With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Bone Metastases - VERTICAL Study

The purpose of the study is to investigate effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with bone metastatic disease.

Rationale: Bone metastases are a frequent distant manifestation of solid tumours, and many bone metastases are located in the spine. These patients mostly present with severe (back) pain which reduces quality of life. The primary treatment for pain management is a single-fraction low dose external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), effective in achieving pain reduction in around 60% of patients, of whom 0-23% experience complete pain response. Recently, there is growing evidence that Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) achieves a much higher pain response due to the higher dose administered. In retrospective and a few prospective case series, SBRT for spinal, and also non-spinal metastases has been demonstrated to be safe, and efficacious. However, no randomized controlled trials have been performed.

Objective: To study whether the pain response after three months in patients with osseous metastatic disease increases after SBRT in comparison to low dose EBRT.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial, the VERTICAL study, nested within the PRESENT cohort.

Study population: Eligible patients are MRI-compatible patients with radiographic evidence of bone metastases at the radiotherapy department. Fifty-five patients are recruited in both control and intervention arm.

Intervention: Patients will undergo MRI-based, cone beam CT-guided SBRT and will receive a single dose of 18 Gray (Gy) on the visible metastasis, and 8 Gy on the bony compartment containing the metastasis (e.g. the affected vertebra or pedicle).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is pain control at three months after radiotherapy. Secondary outcomes are, among others, the occurrence of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and radiation-induced myelopathy, local tumour control and evaluation of quality of life.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Radiographic evidence of bone metastases
• For spinal lesions; per lesion no more than 3 consecutive spine segments involved with one unaffected vertebral body above and below
• No more than 2 painful lesions needing treatment
• Histologic proof of malignancy
• No compression of spinal cord
• No or mild neurological signs (i.e. radiculopathy, dermatomal sensory change, and muscle strength of involved extremity is Medical Research Council (MRC) 4/5
• Medically inoperable or patient refused surgery
• Karnofsky performance score (KPS) > 50
• Numeric rating scale (NRS) > 3
• Age > 18 years
• Written informed consent
• Filling out PRESENT-questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

• Lesion in C1 or C2
• Radio-sensitive histology such as multiple myeloma, lymphoma, small cell, germ cell
• Spinal MRI cannot be completed for any reason (in according with the MRI protocol of the Department of Radiology)
• Impossible to delineate metastasis and organs at risk (OAR) due to artifacts on CT or MRI from previous surgical stabilization
• Unable to undergo SBRT treatment, according to treating doctor's opinion
• Epidural disease
• Severe, worsening or progressive neurological deficit
• Unstable lesion requiring surgical stabilization
• Patient with < 3 months life expectancy
• Previous EBRT or SBRT to same level
• Chemotherapy or systemic radionuclide delivery within 24 hours before and after SBRT