Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHRC-K14-009 | Other Grant/Funding Number | DGOS/INCA | |
| 2017-A03112-51 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute, France | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Resectable esophageal or junctional cancer requires medical treatment by radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Currently, one of the most commonly used chemotherapy treatment is the FOLFOX. It is a combination of three drugs administered intravenously: fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and folinic acid. This is the standard treatment.
Another protocol of chemotherapy is widely used by certain European and American teams, due to promising results : a combination of two drugs administered intravenously: Paclitaxel and Carboplatin (CarboP-pacliT). At present, no clinical study has shown the superiority of one treatment over the other.
The objective of this Phase II study is to clarify clinical practice by comparing these two chemotherapy treatments.
There is no standard preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiation (NCRT) regimen for resectable esophageal cancer, because most if all trials failed to show any survival advantage favoring pCRT when compared to surgery only. This failure had been related to the lack of power of some trials, as well as the ability of chemoradiation to potentiate post-operative morbidity (including mortality), and therefore hampering the accrual of its own survival benefit. Hopefully, meta-analyses showed that NCRT increases survival when compared to surgery only. However, in the clinical practice, this does not make easier the choice of the best NCRT treatment. It appeared that the radiation regimen that were used in each randomized trials were heterogeneous with respect with dose, fraction, length of treatment, fields, dosimetry planning, and quality control. This applies also to chemotherapy with respect with the kind of cytotoxics that were used (including number of drugs), as well as dosage, and the number of cycles, although most of the time cytotoxics were fluorouracil and cisplatin.
Dutch colleagues recently showed that NCRT with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel increase survival, without increasing postoperative mortality. Of note, most tumors in this trial arose from the lower third of the esophagus and esogastric junction and these habitually correlate with less postoperative morbidity compared to upper third tumors. Moreover, the lung volume spared from radiation was greater in junctional tumors than in upper third cancers - a critical point in the development of radiation-induced pneumonitis and subsequent postoperative mortality. It is difficult to understand how this taxane-based chemotherapy is active, as it did not make better that fluorouracil-based regimen in non-operable patients, and as NCRT with taxanes makes radiation-induced pneumonitis more likely. The favorable impact of this NCRT may lie on its radiation regimen. A moderate total dose of radiation, smaller radial margins than in other trials and modern dosimetry with 3D-planning all improve the safety of treatment and of subsequent surgery. Finally, the favorable impact of the Dutch NCRT regimen may lies on the fact that it does not include cisplatin, a compound which has been found related to the occurrence of more sudden deaths than a non cisplatin-based regimen such as the FOLFOX combination (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, folinic acid) in the setting of definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Our aim is to evaluate the short-term benefit (complete resection rate) and safety (severe postoperative rate) of 2 preoperative regimen, (carboplatin-paclitaxel or fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-folinic acid), combined to the Dutch radiation backbone, in operable esophageal and junctional (Siewert I-II) cancer. The present trial offers the unique opportunity to compare two therapeutic strategies that have already been shown to be efficient in large randomized controlled trials offering level-1 evidence.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOLFOX | Active Comparator |
|
|
| CarboP-pacliT | Experimental |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLFOX | Drug | radiochemotherapy before surgery |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term benefit of 2 preoperative regimen: complete resection rate AND severe (grade ≥ 3) postoperative morbidity/mortality according to the Clavien-Dindo classification | Complete resection rate (R0, that is "complete removal of all tumor with microscopic examination of margins showing no tumor cells") AND severe (grade ≥ 3) postoperative morbidity/mortality according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Severe postoperative complication is defined by grade ≥III per-operative or post-operative complication occurring in the 30 days after surgery. | up to 30 days after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of completion of full treatment without modification | up to 58 days | |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of both regimen in term of overall survival | Overall survival using Kaplan-Meier method | From date of inclusion until the date of death from any cause assessed up to 36 months after the last surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| DVH (CoDose-Volume-Histogram (DVH) and postoperative respiratory morbidity | up to 30 days after the beginning of radiotherapy | |
| Comparison of both arms in terms of safety and efficacy | Evaluation of preoperative mortality (grade 5) rate according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 criteria, pre-operative morbidities according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 criteria, post-operative morbidities occurring in the 30 days after surgery with the main post-operative complication graded according to Clavien-Dindo, post-operative morbidities occurring more than 30 days after surgery graded according to NCI-CTCAE V4.0, postoperative respiratory morbidity rate according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Evaluation of overall survival and disease-free survivalusing Kaplan-Meier method, complete pathological response (ypCR) rate |
Inclusion Criteria:
Resectable and operable esophageal cancer located under the carena (beyond 25 cm from the incisors) or junctional cancer (Siewert I or II)
Invasive adenocarcinoma or squamous cell type (to stick to the population included in the CROSS trial)
Patient who present with:
ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
Patient eligible for preoperative chemoradiation with either fluorouracil- oxaliplatin-folinic acid, or Paclitaxel-carboplatin
Age ≥ 18
Peripheral neuropathy ≤ NCI-CTC grade 1
Adequate bone marrow reserve, normal renal and liver functions:
Start of treatment within 28 days after randomization
Negative pregnancy test (serum beta-HCG) performed within 1 week prior to start of study treatment in females with reproductive potential
Patient covered by government health insurance
Patient who provide a signed written informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Antoine ADENIS, MD | Centre Oscar Lambret | Principal Investigator |
| Guillaume PIESSEN, MD | University Hospital of Lille | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICO Paul Papin | Angers | France | ||||
| CHU Bordeaux |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27194176 | Derived | Messager M, Mirabel X, Tresch E, Paumier A, Vendrely V, Dahan L, Glehen O, Vasseur F, Lacornerie T, Piessen G, El Hajbi F, Robb WB, Clisant S, Kramar A, Mariette C, Adenis A. Preoperative chemoradiation with paclitaxel-carboplatin or with fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-folinic acid (FOLFOX) for resectable esophageal and junctional cancer: the PROTECT-1402, randomized phase 2 trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 May 18;16:318. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2335-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| CarboP-pacliT | Drug | radiochemotherapy before surgery |
|
|
| Evaluation of the efficacy of both regimen in term of disease-free survival | Disease-free survival using Kaplan-Meier method | From date of inclusion until the date of first documented progression whichever came first, assessed up to 36 months after the last surgery |
| Evaluation of the safety of the evaluated regimens in terms of preoperative mortality. | Preoperative mortality (grade 5) rate, according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 criteria | From registration to surgery |
| Evaluation of the safety of the evaluated regimens in terms of preoperative morbidities, postoperative morbidities, respiratory morbidities. | Pre-operative morbidities according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 criteria, post-operative morbidities occurring in the 30 days after surgery with the main post-operative complication graded according to Clavien-Dindo, post-operative morbidities occurring more than 30 days after surgery graded according to NCI-CTCAE V4.0, postoperative respiratory morbidity rate according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. | From start of treatment to end of study |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of both regimen in term of Pathological response rate | Complete pathological response (ypCR) rate | Surgery |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of both regimen in term of quality of life | Quality of life: QLQC30 and OES18 | Up to 3 years after surgery |
| From date of inclusion until the date of death from any cause assessed up to 36 months after the last surgery |
| Net treatment benefit estimation | To estimate the net treatment benefit, combining efficacy and safety endpoints, using the Generalized Pairwise Comparisons Method - GPC method (Buyse, 2010) | From date of inclusion until the date of death from any cause assessed up to 36 months after the last surgery |
| Prognostic factor and treatment effect controlling for possible confounding factors | To identify prognostic factors associated to disease-free survival, and evaluate the treatment effect controlling for possible confounding factors. Following factors will be studied: pre-therapeutic stage (II versus III), pre-therapeutic N (positive versus negative), post-surgery stage (ypT0N0 versus other), TRG (1-2 versus other) and resection (R0 versus other). | From date of inclusion until the date of first documented progression whichever came first, assessed up to 36 months after the last surgery |
| Bordeaux |
| France |
| University Hospital of Lille | Lille | 59000 | France |
| Centre Oscar Lambret | Lille | 59020 | France |
| Hôpital La Timone | Marseille | France |
| Hôpital Nord | Marseille | France |
| ICM - Val d'Aurelle | Montpellier | France |
| CH Lyon sud | Pierre-Bénite | France |
| Centre Eugène Marquis | Rennes | France |
| ICO René Gauducheau | Saint-Herblain | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004938 | Esophageal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C410216 | Folfox protocol |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D000077150 | Oxaliplatin |
| D002955 | Leucovorin |
| D016190 | Carboplatin |
| D017239 | Paclitaxel |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D005575 | Formyltetrahydrofolates |
| D013763 | Tetrahydrofolates |
| D005492 | Folic Acid |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D003067 | Coenzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
Not provided
Not provided