Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients will be randomized to receive HEALICOIL™ REGENESORB (the study anchor) or TWINFIX Ultra HA, a similar comparative product, for use in the repair of their shoulder injury. They will be asked to complete questionnaires throughout the study and will receive an MRI, CT and multiple ultrasound images. The MRIs and radiographs will be used to assess bony ingrowth at the repair site, and the ultrasound to assess repair success rate of the rotator cuff. The clinical and radiological outcomes will be compared between the study and control groups. It is hypothesized that there will be 85% high quality ossification at anchor site for HEALICOIL REGENESORB and 49.9% high quality ossification for TWINFIX Ultra HA at 24 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEALICOIL Regenesorb | Experimental | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair |
|
| Twinfix Ultra HA | Active Comparator | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suture Anchor HEALOCOIL | Device | Rotator cuff tears will be repaired intraoperatively using suture anchors |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ossification Quality Score (Bony Ingrowth Assessed Via CT) | The ossification quality score is an ordinal measure of quality of bone reabsorption that is divided into four progressive groups. Quality score 1 reflects "little or no bone ossification", Quality score 2 reflects "Some ossification; discontinuous or with a wide lucent rim", Quality score 3 reflects "Ossification with a thin lucent rim", and Quality score 4 reflects "Good ossification; border of tract vague". For this study, Quality scores 1 and 2 will be merged (defined as low quality ossification) as will Quality scores 3 and 4 (defined as high quality ossification). The proportion of suture anchors graded as having high quality ossification versus low quality ossification will be compared between the two groups to determine if there is a significant difference between Healicoil and Twinfix anchors in regards to quality of ossification. | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a Rotator Cuff Re-tear | Repair failure rate (Defined as number of subjects with a re-tear) determined by ultrasound 6 months after surgery. | 6 months |
| Visual Analogue Pain Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stefan Tolan, MD | Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas - Greenville Health System | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas | Greenville | South Carolina | 29615 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | HEALICOIL Regenesorb | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture Anchor HEALOCOIL: Rotator cuff tears will be repaired intraoperatively using suture anchors |
| FG001 | Twinfix Ultra HA | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture anchor Twinfix Ultra HA |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | HEALICOIL Regenesorb | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture Anchor HEALOCOIL: Rotator cuff tears will be repaired intraoperatively using suture anchors |
| BG001 | Twinfix Ultra HA |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Ossification Quality Score (Bony Ingrowth Assessed Via CT) | The ossification quality score is an ordinal measure of quality of bone reabsorption that is divided into four progressive groups. Quality score 1 reflects "little or no bone ossification", Quality score 2 reflects "Some ossification; discontinuous or with a wide lucent rim", Quality score 3 reflects "Ossification with a thin lucent rim", and Quality score 4 reflects "Good ossification; border of tract vague". For this study, Quality scores 1 and 2 will be merged (defined as low quality ossification) as will Quality scores 3 and 4 (defined as high quality ossification). The proportion of suture anchors graded as having high quality ossification versus low quality ossification will be compared between the two groups to determine if there is a significant difference between Healicoil and Twinfix anchors in regards to quality of ossification. | The Ossification Quality Score will be assessed for each anchor implanted into a study subjects' shoulder. Because many subjects have more than one rotator cuff suture anchor implanted, the overall number of units analyzed will be greater than the overall number of participants analyzed. | Posted | Count of Units | Suture Anchors | 2 years | Suture Anchors | Suture Anchors |
Adverse events were collected and assessed from time of surgery to two year final study follow-up
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | HEALICOIL Regenesorb | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture Anchor HEALOCOIL: Rotator cuff tears will be repaired intraoperatively using suture anchors |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loose biceps suture anchor | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment | Loose anchored required revision surgery of the biceps. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Adams, Research Coordinator | Hawkins Foundation | 864-454-7458 | kyle.adams@hawkinsfoundation.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 16, 2016 | Apr 10, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070636 | Rotator Cuff Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012421 | Rupture |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000070599 | Shoulder Injuries |
| D013708 | Tendon Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Suture anchor Twinfix Ultra HA | Device |
|
The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) measures the patient-reported level of pain at the two-year follow-up. The scale runs from 0 to 10, with "0" indicating no pain and "10" indicating extreme pain. The lower the VAS Pain level, the better the outcome in regards to level of pain.
| 2 years |
| Function at Two Years as Measured by Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), PENN Shoulder Score (PENN), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) | Outcomes at Two Years on the following:
| 2 years |
Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair
Suture anchor Twinfix Ultra HA
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | HEALICOIL Regenesorb | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture Anchor HEALOCOIL: Rotator cuff tears will be repaired intraoperatively using suture anchors |
| OG001 | Twinfix Ultra HA | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture anchor Twinfix Ultra HA |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a Rotator Cuff Re-tear | Repair failure rate (Defined as number of subjects with a re-tear) determined by ultrasound 6 months after surgery. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Visual Analogue Pain Scale | The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) measures the patient-reported level of pain at the two-year follow-up. The scale runs from 0 to 10, with "0" indicating no pain and "10" indicating extreme pain. The lower the VAS Pain level, the better the outcome in regards to level of pain. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Function at Two Years as Measured by Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), PENN Shoulder Score (PENN), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) | Outcomes at Two Years on the following:
| Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 2 years |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| EG001 | Twinfix Ultra HA | Suture anchor for rotator cuff repair Suture anchor Twinfix Ultra HA | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 26 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PENN |
|
| EQ-5D |
|