DLT was defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) occurring during the first cycle for Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, Japan LIC and Phase 1b Cohort 3, or the first 2 cycles for Phase 1b Cohort 2A of treatment, and considered attributable to study intervention: Grade 4 neutropenia >7 days; febrile neutropenia; Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicities; Grade 4 rash, mucositis, or diarrhea; failure to receive at least 70% of planned doses; Grade 3 QTcF prolongation in asymptomatic participants; treatment-related AEs attributable to PF-06747775, palbociclib or both that caused palbociclib treatment delay >= 10 days or omission of at least 12 doses of the combination. Grade of AE was defined according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03.

The analysis population included participants in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, Japan LIC, Phase 1b Cohorts 2A and 3 who were eligible, received study treatment and who either experienced a DLT during the first cycle of PF-06747775 or the first 2 cycles of PF 06747775 plus palbociclib, or completed the DLT observation period.

Number of participants with confirmed OR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1. Complete response (CR) was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) was defined as Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time from Cycle 1 Day 1 to the date of the first documentation of objective progression (PD) or death due to any cause. PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

AE = any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events = death related to an AE. Treatment-emergent events = between first dose of study treatment and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. Grade 3 (Severe) events = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events = death related to an AE. Treatment-emergent events = between first dose of study treatment and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Treatment-related AEs were determined by the investigator.

The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator.

The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Laboratory values included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell count (WBC), absolute (abs) neutrophils, abs lymphocytes, abs monocytes, abs eosinophils, abs basophils, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (Alk Phos), sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, creatinine, uric acid, glucose, albumin, phosphorous or phosphate, prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), urinalysis and pregnancy test. Grades of laboratory results were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3 (Severe) events = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death.

The safety analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Number of participants meeting categorical criteria of QTcF values when PF-06747775 was given as a single agent in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, PF-06747775 200 mg QD group (only participants in Phase 2 Cohort 1 and Japan LIC were eligible for QTcF within this combined group), and in combination with palbociclib and avelumab in Phase 1b/2 Cohorts 2A, 2B and 3. Criteria for categorization of QTcF were defined as: maximum values 450 - <480 msec, 480 - <500 msec and >=500 msec.

QTcF analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 ECG assessment undertaken pre dose and 1 post dose at steady state in triplicate.

Number of participants meeting categorical criteria of QTcB values when PF-06747775 was given as a single agent in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, PF-06747775 200 mg QD group (only participants in Phase 2 Cohort 1 and Japan LIC were eligible for QTcB within this combined group), and in combination with palbociclib and avelumab in Phase 1b/2 Cohorts 2A, 2B and 3. Criteria for categorization of QTcB were defined as: maximum values 450 - <480 msec, 480 - <500 msec and >=500 msec.

QTcB analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 ECG assessment undertaken pre dose and 1 post dose at steady state in triplicate.

Number of participants in Phase 1 cohorts with confirmed and unconfirmed OR according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. PR was defined as Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Stable was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR or PD. PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Indeterminate was defined as progression not documented.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with OR based assessment of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 that must have been confirmed ≥4 weeks later. Participants who did not have an on treatment radiographic tumor assessment due to early progression, who received anti tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non responders in the assessment of ORR. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. PR was defined as Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time from Cycle 1 Day 1 to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

DOR was the time from the date of first documentation of confirmed CR or PR to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DOR (months) = [progression/death date - first date of OR + 1]/30.4. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. PR was defined as Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Stable was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR or PD. PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

OS probability was based on Kaplan-Meier method. OS was defined as the time from the start date to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.

The response analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had measurable disease and adequate baseline assessment, and at least 1 post baseline assessment during the study.

Plasma area under the curve from zero to infinite time (AUCinf) of PF-06747775 as a single agent after single dose on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts and on Day -4 lead-in period in Phase 2 Cohort 1. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of PF-06747775 as a single agent after single dose on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts and on Day -4 lead-in period in Phase 2 Cohort 1. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Half-life (t1/2) of PF-06747775 as a single agent after single dose on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts and on Day -4 lead-in period in Phase 2 Cohort 1. t1/2 was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Apparent clearance (CL/F) of PF-06747775 as a single agent after single dose on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts and on Day -4 lead-in period in Phase 2 Cohort 1. CL/F was calculated as: CL/F = dose / AUCinf. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Vz/F was defined as apparent volume of distribution. Vz/F was calculated as: Vz/F = dose / (AUCinf * kel). kel was defined as terminal phase rate constant and calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Pre-dose concentration at steady state (Ctrough) of PF-06747775 as a single agent after multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, Phase 2 Cohorts 1 and 2B. Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration during multiple dosing and observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

CL/F of PF-06747775 as a single agent after multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, Phase 2 Cohorts 1 and 2B. CL/F was calculated as: CL/F = dose / AUCtau. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Rac was calculated as: Rac = (steady state AUCtau) / (single dose AUC24). AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. AUC24 was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Steady state accumulation ratio (Rss) of PF-06747775 as a single agent after multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, Phase 2 Cohorts 1 and 2B. Rss was calculated as: Rss = (steady state AUCtau) / (single dose AUCinf). AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCinf of sildenafil dosed alone and in combination with PF-06747775 200 mg or 300 mg on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 Sildenafil sub-study. AUCinf was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax values for sildenafil were analyzed using a mixed effects model with treatment as fixed effect and participant as random effect to estimate the effect of steady state PF-06747775 on sildenafil exposure. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

CL/F of sildenafil dosed alone on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 Sildenafil sub-study. CL/F was calculated as: CL/F = dose / AUCinf. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCinf of sildenafil dosed alone and in combination with PF-06747775 200 mg or 300 mg on Day -8 lead-in period in Phase 1 Sildenafil sub-study. AUCinf was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax values for sildenafil were analyzed using a mixed effects model with treatment as fixed effect and participant as random effect to estimate the effect of steady state PF-06747775 on sildenafil exposure.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

CL/F of sildenafil dosed alone and in combination with PF-06747775 200 mg or 300 mg on Day -8 lead-in period and Cycle 1 Day 11 in Phase 1 Sildenafil sub-study. CL/F was calculated as: CL/F = dose / AUCinf. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau of PF-06747775 at the RP2D under fed and overnight fasted conditions in Phase 1 Food Effect and Rifampin DDI sub-study. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of PF-06747775 at the RP2D under fed and overnight fasted conditions in Phase 1 Food Effect and Rifampin DDI sub-study. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau of PF-06747775 at the RP2D when dosed alone and after esomeprazole/itraconazole treatment in Phase 1 Esomeprazole-Itraconazole DDI sub-study. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of PF-06747775 at RP2D when dosed alone and after esomeprazole/itraconazole treatment in Phase 1 Esomeprazole-Itraconazole DDI sub-study. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau of PF-06747775 at RP2D dosed alone and after rifampin treatment in Phase 1 Food Effect and Rifampin DDI sub-study. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of PF-06747775 at RP2D dosed alone and after rifampin treatment in Phase 1 Food Effect and Rifampin DDI sub-study. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau of PF-06747775 following multiple doses when given in combination with palbociclib on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 2A and Phase 2 Cohort 2B. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of PF-06747775 following multiple doses when given in combination with palbociclib on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 2A and Phase 2 Cohort 2B. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

CL/F of PF-06747775 following multiple doses when given in combination with palbociclib on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 2A and Phase 2 Cohort 2B. CL/F was calculated as: CL/F = dose / AUCtau. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Ctrough of PF-06747775 following multiple doses when given in combination with palbociclib on Day 15 of Cycles 1-2 and Day 1 of Cycles 2-4 in Phase 1b Cohort 2A and Phase 2 Cohort 2B. Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration during multiple dosing and observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Ctrough of PF-06747775 following multiple doses when given in combination with avelumab on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 3. Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration during multiple dosing and observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau of palbociclib following multiple doses when given in combination with PF-06747775 on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 2A and Phase 2 Cohort 2B. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of palbociclib following multiple doses when given in combination with PF-06747775 on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 2A and Phase 2 Cohort 2B. Cmax was the maximum concentration after dose administration observed directly from the data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Ctrough of palbociclib following multiple doses when given in combination with PF-06747775 on Day 15 of Cycles 1-2 and Day 1 of Cycles 2-4 in Phase 1b/2 Cohorts 2A and 2B. Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration during multiple dosing and observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Ctrough of avelumab when given in combination with PF-06747775 on Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 3. Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration during multiple dosing and observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of avelumab when given in combination with PF-06747775 on Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 3. Cmax was the end of infusion peak concentration observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Number of participants with EGFR mutations in tumor tissue in all cohorts all phases. EGFR mutation assessments in tumor tissue included the mutations statuses of exon 19 deletion (del 19), exon 21 (L858R), G719X, L861Q, S768I, exon 20 insertions and T790M.

The biomarker analysis set is defined as all participants in the safety analysis set who had at least one screening and post treatment biomarker assessment.

Number of participants with EGFR mutations in plasma in all cohorts all phases. EGFR mutation assessments in plasma included the mutations statuses of exon 19 deletion (del 19), exon 21 (L858R) and T790M.

The biomarker analysis set is defined as all participants in the safety analysis set who had at least one screening and post treatment biomarker assessment.

Number of participants with positive serum ADA of avelumab at pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Phase 1b Cohort 3.

The immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least one ADA sample collected for avelumab.

AUCinf of PF-06747775 following a 200 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -4 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 1 in Japan LIC PK cohort, and following a 100 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -7 in Japan LIC PK cohort. AUCinf was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Cmax of PF-06747775 following a 200 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -4 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 1 in Japan LIC PK cohort, and following a 100 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -7 in Japan LIC PK cohort. Cmax was the maximum concentration observed from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Vz/F of PF-06747775 following a 200 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -4 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 1 in Japan LIC PK cohort, and following a 100 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -7 in Japan LIC PK cohort. Vz/F was defined as apparent volume of distribution. Vz/F was calculated as: Vz/F = dose / (AUCinf * kel). kel was defined as terminal phase rate constant and calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

t1/2 of PF-06747775 following a 200 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -4 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 1 in Japan LIC PK cohort, and following a 100 mg single dose on Lead-in Day -7 in Japan LIC PK cohort. t1/2 was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

AUCtau of PF-06747775 following multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Japan LIC PK cohort. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCtau was calculated using Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Ctrough of PF-06747775 following multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Japan LIC PK cohort. Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration during multiple dosing and observed directly from data.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Rac of PF-06747775 following multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Japan LIC PK cohort. Rac was calculated as: Rac = (steady state AUCtau) / (single dose AUC24). AUC24 was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours following single dose. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

Rss of PF-06747775 following multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Japan RP2D cohort and Cycle 1 Day 15 in Japan PK cohort. Rss was calculated as: Rss = (steady state AUCtau) / (single dose AUCinf). AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.

CL/F of PF-06747775 following single dose on Lead-in Day -4 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort, Lead-in Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 1 in Japan LIC PK cohort, and following multiple doses on Cycle 1 Day 11 in Japan LIC RP2D cohort and on Cycle 1 Day 15 in Japan LIC PK cohort. CL/F was calculated as: CL/F = dose/AUCinf for single dose or dose/AUCtau for multiple doses. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to tau, the dosing interval, where tau = 24 hours. AUCinf was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from zero to extrapolated infinite time.

The PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had sufficient information to estimate at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest for a particular analyte.