Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Kaiser Permanente | OTHER |
| HealthPartners Institute | OTHER |
| The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | OTHER |
| University of Alabama at Birmingham |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will determine whether clinicians who use a diagnostic device treat suspicious occlusal carious lesions (SOCL) surgically more often, with the same frequency, or less frequently, than dentists not relying on a diagnostic device. The study will also determine -- among those SOCLs that are opened -- whether the proportion of lesions that extend into the dentin when dentists are using a diagnostic device is more than, the same, or less than when no device is used.
The overall objectives of this study is to assess the contributions of diagnostic devices in clinicians' decision-making processes surrounding suspicious occlusal carious lesions (SOCL), an assessment that has not yet been attempted, despite the growing popularity of these devices. SOCLs can be defined as occlusal surface areas where visual, tactile, and radiographic signs are insufficient to definitively diagnose caries but where some of these signs are present.This study examines the use of two diagnostic devices on dental practitioners' identification and treatment of SOCLs.
During a four-week pre-intervention period, 90 clinicians will collect and record descriptive and treatment information for the SOCLs they identify. Clinicians will then be randomized into one of 3 study arms: no diagnostic device, DIAGNOdent®, and Spectra®, and will collect and record similar information as the pre-intervention period for another six weeks, enrolling an additional 20 SOCLs. They will also complete diagnostic vignettes at the beginning and end of the study, as well as a post-study questionnaire on the utility of the devices, if assigned to a device arm. Analyses will examine differences in proportion of SOCLs treated surgically in the groups with and without the diagnostic device; and, for those treated surgically, differences in the proportions of SOCLs with extension into dentin. Differences in pre- and post-study responses on the vignettes will suggest which components of the decision-making process involved in SOCL identification and management have been modified by use of the diagnostic devices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Device Clinicians | No Intervention | The clinicians will not receive any additional training. | |
| Spectra Device Clinicians | Experimental | The clinicians in the Spectra Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of clinicians familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. |
|
| DIAGNOdent Device Practitioners | Experimental | The clinicians in the DIAGNOdent Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of clinicians familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spectra Device | Device | Spectra Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Lesions That Received Invasive Treatment and the Number of Lesions Receiving Invasive Treatment That Extended Into Dentin | There was one lesion/patient. | Pre-intervention and post-intervention (one day visit) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Clinicians in Likelihood of Surgically Treating Lesions in Online Vignettes That Display Two Levels of Five Cues (Color, Surface Smoothness, Surface Luster, Caries Risk, and Device Reading (if Applicable) in Post-intervention | Clinicians' likelihood of treating surgical lesions depicted with brown verses black, smooth verses rough, shiny verses matte, in patients with high verses low caries risk, by post-intervention phases. The outcome measure will be to see what cues were used or treatment decisions in the post-intervention phase. Please note that more than one cue could be chosen, so values may add up to more than 100 percent. Participants in the no device group did not receive a device reading cue. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Practitioner: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:
Practice: If a practitioner is in a practice where they share an operatory (including a hygiene chair) only 1 dentist can be recruited from that practice.
Patient: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual with a SOCL must meet all of the following criteria:
Tooth: In order to be eligible to be included in this study, a tooth with a SOCL must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gregg H Gilbert, DDS, MBA | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Study Director |
| Sonia K Makhija, DDS, MPH | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States | ||
| University of Florida |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| National Dental Practice-Based Research Network | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study had a pre-intervention phase, 108 clinicians (HS trained, consented, and met eligibility criterion) and 1500 patients enrolled. 85 clinicians met the enrollment threshold and were randomized.1500 patients were in the post-intervention phase.The pre- and post patients were not the same so the number analyzed for each group varies.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | No Device Practitioners | The practitioners will not receive any additional training. |
| FG001 | Spectra Device Practitioners | The practitioners in the Spectra Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of practitioners familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. Spectra Device: Spectra Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment. |
| FG002 | DIAGNOdent Device Practitioners | The practitioners in the DIAGNOdent Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of practitioners familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. DIAGNOdent: DIAGNOdent Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment. |
| FG003 | Pre-intervention Patients no Device | The patients in the pre-intervention group were not the same as the one in the post-intervention group. The clinicians were the same. |
| FG004 | Pre-randomization Patients Spectra | The patients in the pre-intervention group were not the same as the one in the post-intervention group. The clinicians were the same. |
| FG005 | Pre-randomization Patients DIANGOdent | The patients in the pre-intervention group were not the same as the one in the post-intervention group. The clinicians were the same. |
| FG006 | Post-randomization Patients no Device | The patients in the pre-intervention group were not the same as the one in the post-intervention group. The clinicians were the same. |
| FG007 | Post-randomization Patients Spectra | The patients in the pre-intervention group were not the same as the one in the post-intervention group. The clinicians were the same. |
| FG008 | Post-randomization Patients DIAGNOdent | The patients in the pre-intervention group were not the same as the one in the post-intervention group. The clinicians were the same. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
These were the patients in each arm for the pre-intervention and post-intervention. The pre-intervention patients were placed in their group that the clinician was ultimately randomized to. Clinicians were the same pre and post.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | No Device Patients Pre-intervention | All pre-and post-intervention patients were different, which is why the numbers don't match. We place the pre-intervention patients into the arm their clinican was ultimately assigned to. |
| BG001 | Spectra Device Patients Pre-intervention |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | The pre-intervention phase had 1500 patients and the post-intervention had 1500 patients. The pre-intervention patients are not the same as the patients in post-intervention. The clinicians were the same in both phases. Age was not reported for clinicians, only year of graduation. The race collected on the clinician was different as well. I have reported on the information we have collected. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Lesions That Received Invasive Treatment and the Number of Lesions Receiving Invasive Treatment That Extended Into Dentin | There was one lesion/patient. | Only the patients who received invasive treatment were analyzed for extension into dentin.Not all columns add up to the total N due to missing values. | Posted | Number | lesions | Pre-intervention and post-intervention (one day visit) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | No Device Clinicians | The practitioners will not receive any additional training. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Sonia Makhija | National Dental PBRN | 2059965298 | smakhija@uab.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of Florida | OTHER |
| University of Rochester | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| DIAGNOdent | Device | DIAGNOdent Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment. |
|
| Post-intervention (dentists completed the vignettes one time) |
| Number of Clinicians in Likelihood of Surgically Treating Lesions in Online Vignettes That Display Two Levels of Four Cues (Color, Surface Smoothness, Surface Luster, and Caries Risk) in Pre-intervention | Clinicians' likelihood of treating surgical lesions depicted with brown verses black, smooth verses rough, shiny verses matte, in patients with high verses low caries risk, by post-intervention phases. The outcome measure will be to see what cues were used or treatment decisions in the pre-intervention phase. Please note that more than one cue could be chosen, so values may add to more than 100 percent of participants. | Pre-intervention (dentists completed the vignettes one time) |
| Gainesville |
| Florida |
| 32610 |
| United States |
| HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55445 | United States |
| University of Rochester | Rochester | New York | 14620 | United States |
| Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research | Portland | Oregon | 97227-1110 | United States |
| University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
All pre-and post-intervention patients were different, which is why the numbers don't match. We place the pre-intervention patients into the arm their clinican was ultimately assigned to. |
| BG002 | DIAGNOdent Device Patients Pre-intervention | All pre-and post-intervention patients were different, which is why the numbers don't match. We place the pre-intervention patients into the arm their clinican was ultimately assigned to. |
| BG003 | No Device Clinicians | They received no device at randomization |
| BG004 | Spectra Clinicians | The practitioners in the Spectra Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of practitioners familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. |
| BG005 | DIAGNOdent Clinicians | The practitioners in the DIAGNOdent Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of practitioners familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. |
| BG006 | No Device Patients Post-intervention |
| BG007 | Spectra Device Patients Post-intervention |
| BG008 | DIAGNOdent Device Patients Post-intervention |
| BG009 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | The pre-intervention patients were different than the post-intervention patients. Clinicians were the same. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Patients at the pre-intervention stage are not the same patients as post-randomization, which is why the numbers are different in both phases. Clinicians were the same. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | The patients at pre-intervention are not the same patients at post-intervention. We just placed them in the eventual categories. The clinicians were the same. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | patients and clinicians |
|
| Number of Patients and Clinicians | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG002 | Spectra Patients Post-intervention | The patients in the pre-intervention stage are not the same as the post-intervention stage |
| OG003 | DIAGNOdent Patients Post-intervention | The patients in the pre-intervention stage are not the same as the post-intervention stage |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Clinicians in Likelihood of Surgically Treating Lesions in Online Vignettes That Display Two Levels of Five Cues (Color, Surface Smoothness, Surface Luster, Caries Risk, and Device Reading (if Applicable) in Post-intervention | Clinicians' likelihood of treating surgical lesions depicted with brown verses black, smooth verses rough, shiny verses matte, in patients with high verses low caries risk, by post-intervention phases. The outcome measure will be to see what cues were used or treatment decisions in the post-intervention phase. Please note that more than one cue could be chosen, so values may add up to more than 100 percent. Participants in the no device group did not receive a device reading cue. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Post-intervention (dentists completed the vignettes one time) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Clinicians in Likelihood of Surgically Treating Lesions in Online Vignettes That Display Two Levels of Four Cues (Color, Surface Smoothness, Surface Luster, and Caries Risk) in Pre-intervention | Clinicians' likelihood of treating surgical lesions depicted with brown verses black, smooth verses rough, shiny verses matte, in patients with high verses low caries risk, by post-intervention phases. The outcome measure will be to see what cues were used or treatment decisions in the pre-intervention phase. Please note that more than one cue could be chosen, so values may add to more than 100 percent of participants. | Pre-intervention the dentists were not randomized and had no device training and all dentists were combined | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Pre-intervention (dentists completed the vignettes one time) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 28 |
| 0 |
| 28 |
| 0 |
| 28 |
| EG001 | Spectra Device Clinicians | The practitioners in the Spectra Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of practitioners familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. Spectra Device: Spectra Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment. | 0 | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| EG002 | DIAGNOdent Device Clinicians | The practitioners in the DIAGNOdent Device Arm will be trained to the device according to the manufacturers' usual care for training. The training will consist of viewing the manufacturer's instructions for the device. Training will also consist of practitioners familiarizing themselves with the device through unsupervised clinical use with patients. DIAGNOdent: DIAGNOdent Caries detection device is used for study data collection recording the results of the dental examination and recording results of dental treatment. | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| EG003 | No Device Patients (Pre-intervention and Post-intervention) | The total number of patients in these two phases is 1000 and 0/1000 were affected. These were 2 different sets of patients. | 0 | 1,000 | 0 | 1,000 | 0 | 1,000 |
| EG004 | Spectra Patients (Pre-intervention and Post-intervention) | The total number of patients in these two phases is 918 and 0/918 were affected. These were 2 different sets of patients. | 0 | 918 | 0 | 918 | 0 | 918 |
| EG005 | DIAGNOdent Patients (Pre-intervention and Post-intervention) | The total number of patients in these two phases is 1057 and 0/1057 were affected. These were 2 different sets of patients. | 0 | 1,057 | 0 | 1,057 | 0 | 1,057 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Risk |
|
| Feel of the lesion |
|
| Device reading |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Feel of the lesion |
|