Nasal High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Reduce Post-extubation pCO2 in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Nasal High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Reduce Post-extubation pCO2 in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: a Randomized Controlled Trial
To investigate whether nasal high frequency oscillation ventilation (nHFOV) immediately after extubation reduces the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) at 72 hours after extubation in comparison with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in very low birth weight infants (VLBWs).
Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing nHFOV vs nCPAP immediately after extubation of VLBW infants.
Intervention and treatment protocol as described for the two study arms.
Definition of treatment failure (infant meets at least one criterion):
Sample size:
Assuming a variability of the paCO2 as previously reported for difficult-to-wean preterm infants in our unit (Czernik C, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012) and a treatment failure rate of 22% within 72 hours after extubation, we calculated a sample size of 34 patients in each study arm to detect a difference in the paCO2 of 7 mmHg, using a two-sided significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.8.
Randomization:
Sequence generation by an independent statistician and a study nurse. Block randomization using at least two different block sizes. Allocation concealment using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes.
Data monitoring:
By an independent statistician.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: