Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Miami | OTHER |
| University of Rochester | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The proposed research aims to address the question: Compared to the current standard of care for home-based HIV tests, in which persons conduct and interpret HIV tests without counseling, does the addition of video conferencing with a remote counselor increase health-enhancing, protective behaviors among male-male couples and facilitate linkage to care for those who test positive?
The investigators propose to address four specific aims through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to take place over a four-year period. The investigators plan to enroll and maintain a cohort of 350 men who have sex with men (MSM) couples: 175 self-reported concordant HIV-negative and 175 self-reported HIV-discordant couples. Within this sample, the proposed study will examine the impact of home-testing with video-based Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) (intervention) versus home-testing alone (control) on changes in: sexual risk-taking (e.g., UAI), formation and adherence to explicit agreements about sex, relationship functioning for the management of HIV risk, and linkage to care for newly diagnosed HIV positives among MSM couples who live throughout the US. To assess these specific changes, couples will complete online surveys at 3 time points (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Placebo Comparator | Each participant will receive an at-home test kit and will be asked to test and return results to investigator. |
|
| Intervention Arm | Active Comparator | Each participant will receive an at-home test kit and will be asked to take the test in conjunction with an online CHTC session. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC, CVCT) | Behavioral | Male couples randomized to the experimental group (Couples HIV Testing and Counseling, CHTC/CVCT) will receive HIV counseling and testing as a couple via an online, HIPPA-compliant videoconferencing service. The dyad-centered session will last less than one hour and focus on couples agreement, prevention strategies, and/or linkage to HIV care, depending on each couple's test results. Participants will complete follow-up surveys at 3 and 6 months post-testing. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Process and use of communal coping - Outcome Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure process and use of communal coping or how couples work together and make decisions together to reduce the health threat. We created three subscales to capture the full range of outcome efficacy related to these three processes of communal coping. For the first subscale, Joint Effort, we used the stem, "My partner and I believe that 'working together' versus on our own is an effective strategy;" for the second subscale, Communication, we used the stem, "Communicating with my partner is an effective strategy for;" and for the third subscale, Planning and Decision-making, we used the stem, "My partner and I making decisions together rather than separately is an effective strategy." The items for each of the three subscales were the same as the items used for the Preference for Sexual Health Outcomes scale. | 6 months |
| Process and use of communal coping - Couple Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure process and use of communal coping or how couples work together and make decisions together to reduce the health threat. Couple efficacy is defined as a couple's confidence that together they can engage in communal coping efforts. We developed three subscales in parallel to Outcome Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat Scale: Joint Effort, Communication, and Planning and Decision-making. | 6 months |
| Process and use of communal coping - Communal Coping to Reduce HIV Threat | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure process and use of communal coping or how couples work together and make decisions together to reduce the health threat. Scale: We developed three subscales in parallel to the Outcome Efficacy Scale and the Couple Efficacy Scale: Joint Effort, Communication, and Planning and Decision-making. All three subscales used the same six items from these other scales to capture the managing of reducing the health threat of HIV, but the stems were different. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Linkage to Care | We will measure linkage to care with the following outcomes as indicators per the recent recommendations of the Institute of Medicine: within 3 months of HIV diagnosis (1) attending at least one clinical care appointment, (2) having at least one CD4 test performed, and (3) having at least one viral load test performed. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Predisposing couple factors - Perceived Severity of HIV | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure predisposing couple factors one of which will be Perceived Severity of HIV scale. This construct involves the perception of the personal, psychosocial, and physical consequences of a particular health threat. We developed a total of 13 items that crossed three pertinent domains: personal, psychosocial and physical. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Male sex at birth
Male gender
18 or older
In a relationship with a male sexual partner of duration six months or longer
Negative or unknown HIV status and not having tested in the last 6 months, with a partner meeting the same criteria OR in a sero-discordant with the negative/unknown partner reporting not having tested in the past 6 months
No recent (past year) severe intimate partner violence (IPV) reported within the couple. IPV will be determined by responses to the below questions, in addition to parallel questions addressing perpetration of the specified acts:
Willingness to have HIV test kits delivered to a home address they provide
Willingness to be tested for HIV with one's male sexual partner
Willingness to be randomized to either study arm
Willingness and ability to participate in video-based counseling (must have a computer or tablet with video and audio capabilities, Internet access)
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rob Stephenson, PhD | University of Michigan School of Nursing Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Michigan Center for Sexuality & Health Disparities (SexLab) | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28559225 | Derived | Stephenson R, Freeland R, Sullivan SP, Riley E, Johnson BA, Mitchell J, McFarland D, Sullivan PS. Home-Based HIV Testing and Counseling for Male Couples (Project Nexus): A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 30;6(5):e101. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7341. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003376 | Counseling |
| C119825 | chitinase C |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008605 | Mental Health Services |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D003153 | Community Health Services |
| D006296 | Health Services |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| at-home test kit | Behavioral | Male couples in the control group will receive test kits, but will not receive any testing intervention. Once individual results are reported,participants will be contacted via phone by study staff with options for referrals to services for the reactive partner(s). Participants will complete follow-up surveys at 3 and 6 months post-testing. |
|
| Changes in Sexual Agreements |
We measure changes in sexual agreements using questions from previous studies of MSM couples' sexual agreements. Participants will be asked which of the following best describes their current sexual agreement with their main partner: "both of us cannot have sex with outside partners," "we can have sex with outside partners, without any conditions or restrictions," "we can have sex with outside partners, but with conditions or restrictions," and "we do not have an agreement." Additional items about agreements will further assess whether couples permitted (or did not permit) that certain sexual behaviors, namely UAI and oral sex, could occur with outside partners. In follow-up surveys, participants will be asked whether their agreement changed, and if so, to re-categorize their agreement type. |
| 6 months |
| Changes in Sexual Behavior | We measure changes in sexual behavior using behavioral measures adapted from the NHBS behavioral inventory and previously used with thousands of MSM by our team will collect information both on sexual behaviors with the main sex partner in the 3 months before the interview, and on sexual behaviors with all sex partners outside the relationship. For sex with the main partner, men will be asked to estimate the number of anal sex acts with the main partner, and the number of those acts that were condom-protected. For outside the relationship, we will ask a series of questions about each outside partner, including HIV status of that partner (if known), whether the sex outside the relationship was disclosed to the main partner, the number and type of sex acts with each outside partner, and the proportion of those sex acts that were protected by condoms. | 6 months |
| 6 months |
| Predisposing couple factors - Preferences for General Lifestyle | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure predisposing couple factors. One factor of interest will be Preferences for General Lifestyle scale which includes 6 outcomes including diet and nutrition and social activities. | 6 months |
| Predisposing couple factors - Preferences for General Sexual Health | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure predisposing couple factors. One factor of interest will be Preferences for Sexual Health Outcomes scale which relates to sexual health, for example, reducing your risk for HIV. | 6 months |
| Predisposing couple factors - Conflict Style | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure predisposing couple factors. One factor of interest is Conflict Style which would determine how respondents typically handle conflict in their relationships using the Conflict Style Inventory. | 6 months |
| Predisposing couple factors - Communication Style | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure predisposing couple factors. One factor of interest is Communication Style which would determine how respondents typically handle conflict in their relationships using the Conflict Style Inventory. | 6 months |
| Predisposing couple factors - Problem-solving Skills | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure predisposing couple factors. One factor of interest is Problem-solving Skills which will be measured with the adherence problem solving / readiness scale. | 6 months |
| Partner's transformation of motivation - Emotional Response | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure partner's transformation of motivation or the ability of the participants to respond (1) cognitively and (2) emotionally to the health threat. The scale for emotional response includes whether the respondent reports being fearful, nervous, or anxious about HIV. | 6 months |
| Partner's transformation of motivation - Cognitive Response | Based on Lewis's model Couple's Interdependence Theory, we will measure partner's transformation of motivation or the ability of the participants to respond (1) cognitively and (2) emotionally to the health threat. The scale for cognitive response includes whether the respondent reports understanding the risks of HIV transmission associated with being in a sero-discordant relationship, and the risks associated with outside sex partners. | 6 months |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |