Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical objective of the study is to compare the analgesic effect, toxicity and pathologic effect in the tumors of two radiotherapy schedules used for patients suffering from painful vertebral haemangiomas
Hemangiomas are frequent vertebral lesions (12% of the whole human population) but only 1% displays any clinical symptoms . The most common symptom is local pain, usually non responding for non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. Radiation therapy usually does not result calcification or the tumor regression, but significantly reduces the pain intensity or eliminates it. Currently, the most common RT schedule is conventional radiotherapy using fraction dose (fd) of 2 Gy delivered to the total dose (TD) varying from36 Gy to 40 Gy. The results in pain reduction achieved after larger total doses are better that led us to use radioablative techniques. This procedure is associated with a probability of better analgesic effect and the good local effect (calcification and / or regression of laesion) with high safety of radiation delivery using tracking based cybernetic microradiosurgery (CyberKnife).
The comparison of two modalities of radiation therapy (conventional [fd 2 Gy, TD 36 Gy] and hypofractionated [fd 5 Gy, TD 25 Gy]) used for treatment of painful vertebral hemangioma patients will be performed in the phase III randomized study.
80 patients will be enrolled in this study. All patients will be planned (RT) on the base of CT/MRI fusion.
Patients will be controlled 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after treatment completion and, next every each 6 months. Pain relief, analgesics uptake, local effect (MRI and Technetium - 99m-labelled RBC(red blood cell) scintigraphy) and eventual toxicity will be checked during follow-up (FU).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cybernetic microradiosurgery | Experimental | Hypofractionated microradiosurgery using Cyber Knife to the vertebral hemangioma to the total dose of 25 Gy in 5.0 Gy per fraction, 2 or 3 days a week over the period of 2 weeks, |
|
| Conventional radiotherapy | Active Comparator | Conventionally fractionated external beam conformal radiotherapy to the vertebral hemangioma to the total dose of 36 Gy in 2.0 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week over the period of 3,5 weeks, |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cybernetic microradiosurgery | Radiation | Cybernetic microradiosurgery (6MV) using tracking to TD 25Gy given in five fraction (5Gy p fr) two or three days a week, during 2 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Analgetic effect | rate of pain relief | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Identification of radiologic prognostic and predictal factors of response to external beam radiotherapy (radiosurgery compared to conventional) | 2 years | |
| Identification of biochemical and physical prognostic factors of response to external beam radiotherapy (radiosurgery compared to conventional) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leszek Miszczyk, MD, PhD | Contact | 0048322788001 | leszek@io.gliwice.pl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Leszek Miszczyk, MD, PhD | Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch | Recruiting | Gliwice | Wybrzeze AK 15 | 44-100 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9490090 | Background | Sakata K, Hareyama M, Oouchi A, Sido M, Nagakura H, Tamakawa M, Akiba H, Morita K. Radiotherapy of vertebral hemangiomas. Acta Oncol. 1997;36(7):719-24. doi: 10.3109/02841869709001344. | |
| 14191260 | Background | BARTKOWIAK E, BEDNARCZYK J. [CAVERNOUS ANGIOMA OF THE SPINE COMPLICATED BY COMPRESSION VERTEBRAL FRACTURE]. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 1964;29:393-6. No abstract available. Polish. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional radiotherapy | Radiation | Conventionally fractionated linac based external beam radiation therapy - EBRT, (conformal or dynamic) to the TD of 36 Gy, in 2.0 Gy per fraction 5 days a week over the period of 3.5 weeks) |
|
| 2 years |
| 8905767 | Background | Bremnes RM, Hauge HN, Sagsveen R. Radiotherapy in the treatment of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1996 Nov;39(5):1054-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199611000-00039. |
| 19699592 | Background | Heyd R, Seegenschmiedt MH, Rades D, Winkler C, Eich HT, Bruns F, Gosheger G, Willich N, Micke O; German Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy for Benign Diseases. Radiotherapy for symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: results of a multicenter study and literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.055. Epub 2009 Aug 21. |
| 2261405 | Background | Asthana AK, Tandon SC, Pant GC, Srivastava A, Pradhan S. Radiation therapy for symptomatic vertebral haemangioma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1990 May;2(3):159-62. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80151-7. |
| 10481773 | Background | Brackrock S, Krull A, Schwarz R, Alberti W. [Results of radiotherapy for vertebral hemangioma]. Strahlenther Onkol. 1999 Aug;175(8):405-8. doi: 10.1007/s000660050029. German. |
| 3972655 | Background | Faria SL, Schlupp WR, Chiminazzo H Jr. Radiotherapy in the treatment of vertebral hemangiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Feb;11(2):387-90. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90162-2. |
| 11327544 | Background | Miszczyk L, Ficek K, Trela K, Spindel J. The efficacy of radiotherapy for vertebral hemangiomas. Neoplasma. 2001;48(1):82-4. |
| 2630926 | Background | Pavlovitch JM, Nguyen JP, Djindjian M, Mazeron JJ, Piedbois P, Le Bourgeois JP. [Radiotherapy of vertebral hemangioma with neurologic complications]. Neurochirurgie. 1989;35(5):296-8, 305-8. French. |
| 12504051 | Background | Rades D, Bajrovic A, Alberti W, Rudat V. Is there a dose-effect relationship for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral hemangioma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jan 1;55(1):178-81. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03734-3. |
| 1869466 | Background | Schild SE, Buskirk SJ, Frick LM, Cupps RE. Radiotherapy for large symptomatic hemangiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Aug;21(3):729-35. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90693-x. |
| 8992637 | Background | Winkler C, Dornfeld S, Baumann M, Christen N, Herrmann T, Eberhardt HJ. [The efficacy of radiotherapy in vertebral hemangiomas]. Strahlenther Onkol. 1996 Dec;172(12):681-4. German. |
| 2988274 | Background | Yang ZY, Zhang LJ, Chen ZX, Hu HY. Hemangioma of the vertebral column. A report on twenty-three patients with special reference to functional recovery after radiation therapy. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985 Mar-Apr;24(2):129-32. doi: 10.3109/02841868509134375. |
| 21640516 | Background | Miszczyk L, Tukiendorf A. Radiotherapy of painful vertebral hemangiomas: the single center retrospective analysis of 137 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):e173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.028. Epub 2011 Jun 2. |
| 15669812 | Background | Gerszten PC, Ozhasoglu C, Burton SA, Vogel WJ, Atkins BA, Kalnicki S, Welch WC. CyberKnife frameless single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for benign tumors of the spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 May 15;14(5):e16. doi: 10.3171/foc.2003.14.5.17. |
| 17994789 | Background | Sahgal A, Chou D, Ames C, Ma L, Lamborn K, Huang K, Chuang C, Aiken A, Petti P, Weinstein P, Larson D. Image-guided robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for benign spinal tumors: theUniversity of California San Francisco preliminary experience. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Dec;6(6):595-604. doi: 10.1177/153303460700600602. |