Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Equipment and personnel discontinuity
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Athens | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objectives:
Objectives:
Methods:
Unselected population Personal characteristics: GA, BMI, age, gesta, para Gestational age of more than 37 completed weeks dated by first- and/or mid-trimester scan.
Each patient provide informed consent before the ultrasound measurements. Transperineal ultrasound imaging and digital examinations in laboring patients with a singleton fetus in cephalic/pelvic presentation. Patients examined in their labor rooms.
Admission time:
Empty bladder. Ultrasound machine with a 3.5-5MHz transducer used for the TA and TPU measurements. The probe enclosed in a latex glove covered with ultrasound gel and was then placed between the labia below the pubic symphysis/perineal.
Measured parameters:
Clinical examination (digital vaginal + Leopold) followed immediately after by the acquisition of the sonographic planes necessary to evaluate:occiput position, the long axis of the pubic symphysis, the infrapubic line, the progression angle, the distance of progession, the direction of progression, the midline angle, the head to perineum distance.
Identification and measurement of caput succedaneum (vertical+orizontal) and molding (vertical) when present.
All parameters recorded electronically for later analysis + volumes, when possible.
TPU scans performed at different times during labor,
Notation of time delivery later used to calculate the interval from scanning to delivery.
In all cases measurements are performed in concert with digital examinations (immediately after).
Intraobserver and interobserver analysis 100 women assessed by TPU examination in the study, have at least one set of two replicated scans obtained at approximately the same time. These women provide sets of scans at various times throughout labor, used to assess intraobserver variability.
In order to assess interobserver variability, a second/independent and well trained observer, blinded to the other's results,
The measurements from the ultrasound scanning are obtained offline, after the acquisition of the described planes, on the images stored on the US machine hard disk.
Thus, the managing obstetrician is blinded to the transperineal ultrasound findings. Head position obtained by ultrasound imaging is communicated in case of clinical misdiagnose because of ethical reasons.
The decision whether expectant management, vaginal extraction or Cesarean section is appropriate is made exclusively on the basis of clinical examination.
Demographic data are collected including length of the second stage of labor, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Clinical evaluation in active labor: Leopold manoeuvres, vaginal digital examination. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound evaluations of the mechanism of labor: fetal head position, progression and rotation. Investigation by questionnaire regarding the psychological impact of labor monitoring assisted by sonoraphy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound | Other | Monitoring of the mechanism of labor |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sonopartogram. Longitudinal assessment of the mechanism of labor using ultrasound parameters. | 5 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The pregnant women admitted in active labor at term were considered eligible for the study.
They are included in the study consecutively, depending on the availability of the US operators involved.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicolae Cernea, Professor | University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova | Study Chair |
| Dominic G Iliescu, Lecturer | University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova | Study Director |
| Stefania Tudorache, Lecturer | University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra University Hospital | Athens | Greece | ||||
| University Emergency County Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12388957 | Background | Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;187(4):824-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127142. | |
| 2659012 | Background | Rayburn WF, Siemers KH, Legino LJ, Nabity MR, Anderson JC, Patil KD. Dystocia in late labor: determining fetal position by clinical and ultrasonic techniques. Am J Perinatol. 1989 Jul;6(3):316-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999602. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007744 | Obstetric Labor Complications |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011248 | Pregnancy Complications |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019220 | High-Energy Shock Waves |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069453 | Ultrasonic Waves |
| D013016 | Sound |
| D011840 | Radiation, Nonionizing |
| D011827 | Radiation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Acceptability of ultrasound monitoring of labor |
| Other |
Evaluation of the acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound monitoring - the rate of uptake ultrasound protocol during labor |
|
| Patients' experience regarding intrapartum ultrasound | Other | The day after birth, consenting women are invited to take part in a questionnaire survey. Questionnaires contained no identifying information other than a code number and contains features regarding the patient's impression about the ultrasound monitoring scans during labor. The final questions concerned the willingness of having again another such protocol for labor monitoring in the future. |
|
| Craiova |
| Dolj |
| 200642 |
| Romania |
| 11531156 | Background | Kreiser D, Schiff E, Lipitz S, Kayam Z, Avraham A, Achiron R. Determination of fetal occiput position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Aug;10(4):283-6. doi: 10.1080/714904341. |
| 11896947 | Background | Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x. |
| 11896948 | Background | Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x. |
| 12530614 | Background | Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Sep;12(3):172-7. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.3.172.177. |
| 12710859 | Background | Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):59-63. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.1.59.63. |
| 22302748 | Background | Iliescu DG, Adam G, Tudorache S, Antsaklis P, Cernea N. Quantification of fetal head direction using transperineal ultrasound: an easier approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;40(5):607-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.11117. Epub 2012 Sep 24. No abstract available. |
| 24105734 | Background | Hassan WA, Eggebo T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, Lees CC. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):189-94. doi: 10.1002/uog.13212. |
| 23641509 | Background | Eggebo TM. Ultrasound is the future diagnostic tool in active labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):361-3. doi: 10.1002/uog.12417. No abstract available. |
| 13272981 | Background | FRIEDMAN EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955 Dec;6(6):567-89. doi: 10.1097/00006250-195512000-00001. No abstract available. |
| 21083864 | Background | Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011 Jan;118(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18. |
| 34493509 | Derived | Dira LM, Tudorache S, Antsaklis P, Daskalakis G, Themistoklis D, Belciug S, Stoean R, Novac M, Cara ML, Dragusin R, Florea M, Patru C, Zorila L, Nagy R, Ruican D, Iliescu DG. Sonographic Evaluation of the Mechanism of Active Labor (SonoLabor Study): observational study protocol regarding the implementation of the sonopartogram. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e047188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047188. |
| D055585 |
| Physical Phenomena |