Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Diagnostic accuracy of PET/magnetic resonance and PET/CT will be compared concerning primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis (TNM) staging and therapeutic influence. Workflow scenarios will be evaluated to create imaging protocols which are time efficient and diagnostically accurate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with correct TNM staging defined with PET/magnetic resonance versus PET/CT | 12 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of minutes needed per PET/magnetic resonance protocol compared to PET/CT | 12 month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with a proven or suspected oncological disease referred for a clinically indicated PET/CT with of without contrast media.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Veit-Haibach, MD | University of Zurich | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Zurich, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology | Zurich | Canton of Zurich | 8091 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28914600 | Derived | Sekine T, Delso G, Zeimpekis KG, de Galiza Barbosa F, Ter Voert EEGW, Huellner M, Veit-Haibach P. Reduction of 18F-FDG Dose in Clinical PET/MR Imaging by Using Silicon Photomultiplier Detectors. Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):249-259. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162305. Epub 2017 Sep 14. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided