Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Outpatient services in Germany are less controlled by external quality assurance programs. Comprehensive outcome data for benchmarking or health-care decision-making are missing e.g. for day case surgery. A quality-of-life instrument specific to hernia repair with mesh has been recently proposed (Carolinas Comfort Scale, CCS) .This study evaluates the integration of CSS as part of a multicentre quality assurance scheme for day-case (outpatient) surgery.b.The Study Group on "Quality assurance in ambulatory hernia surgery" has developed and standardized Operation technique for 3D Implants. As a consequence, any deviation must be documented by the standard. The extension to other centers according to a standardized protocol took place (shadowing to learn the operational standards, training in documentation, Minimum quantity 30 interventions per year, etc.).
Rationale
Objective
a. Since this approach has proven successful in the first register phase in every respect, it is now to be continued for another two years in order to develop the basis to establish this concept as widespread (outpatient) standard. The central question will be investigated of whether the outstanding results of register phase 1 will also occur in a wide and distributed application to more centers. If this can be proved, the conditions based on worldwide unique scientific data (methodology and follow-up rates, see below) are created to establish the standard surgical procedure with central integration of 3D meshes (UPP UHS) as gold standard against the Lichtenstein method in the outpatient sector.
Design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHS, UPP, Comfort Plug | Device | only Repairs with 3D Devices (UPP,UHS,Comfort Plug) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life | Evaluation with Carolina Comfort Scale | 4-12-52 weeks after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Complications | clinical examination | 4-12 weeks after surgery |
| pain after Surgery | clinical examination, questionnaire, VAS |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 ys.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All consecutive Patients with inguinal Hernia, Age >18 ys., Mesh Augmentation with Ultra Pro Hernia System, Ultra pro Plug or Ultra pro comfort Plug
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas Koch, MD, FACS | Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Ralph Lorenz, MD | Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18387468 | Background | Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Feb 1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006552 | Hernia, Inguinal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046449 | Hernia, Abdominal |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 4-12-52 weeks after surgery |
| Recurrence | clinical examination | 4-12-52 weeks after surgery |