Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7RC4AG039072-02 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
| Tufts Medical Center | OTHER |
| Harvard University | OTHER |
| Johns Hopkins University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about medication nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. In one randomization arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.
Poor adherence with prescription medications is ubiquitous, regardless of the disease, medication, patient population, or country studied. It is also expensive - annual costs of poor adherence in the United States were recently estimated at $290 billion. This problem has two components: diagnosis and treatment. Regarding diagnosis, doctors' assessments of patients' adherence are inaccurate, and doctors often do not discuss adherence problems with their patients. This makes it attractive to use pharmacy claims to identify nonadherence. While diagnostic data is necessary to solve the non-adherence problem, it is not sufficient. Once diagnosed, doctors must take action to treat nonadherence. Research shows that simply giving doctors claims data about nonadherence is ineffective, probably because it is not clear what action to take, and because the costs in time and energy of taking action are too great. What is currently lacking is a practical way to effectively integrate this diagnostic information and treatment expertise into work flows in primary care doctors' offices, and an effective method of inducing doctors to act on it. Behavioral economics suggests that barriers to doctors' action may be overcome in a cost effective way by altering the architecture of choices doctors face.
The long term goal of this research is to develop systems that effectively connect pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), primary care doctors, clinical pharmacists, and patients in ways that improve medication adherence and patients' health outcomes. The overall objective of this application, which is the next step toward attainment of the investigators long term goal, is to conduct a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Taking advantage of the principle of intelligent choice architecture from behavioral economics, in one arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators central hypothesis, which is strongly supported by work in other fields, is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.
This study is a collaboration between researchers at Brown University, Tufts University, Harvard University, and Johns Hopkins University; Express Scripts; a large regional commercial insurer; and a network of primary care doctors in Eastern Massachusetts. The team is led by Dr. Ira Wilson, an experienced adherence researcher, and includes behavioral and health economists, and a statistician experienced in adherence issues. The investigators will accomplish the investigators overall objectives by pursuing the following Specific Aims:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Default patient default doctor | Experimental | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call |
|
| Information patient default doctor | Experimental | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
|
| Control patient default doctor | No Intervention | Control - no intervention | |
| Choice patient choice doctor | Experimental | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call |
|
| Information patient choice doctor | Experimental | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call | Behavioral |
| ||
| Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Probability of Resolution of Nonadherence Within 30 Days | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which these patients have filled a prescription by 30 days. Outcome is 1 if the patient fills the prescription by 30 days (considered resolution of nonadherence); otherwise it is 0. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of nonadherence (NAE) events resolved within 30 days across all patients in each particular arm. | Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months. |
| Duration of Nonadherence Event | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the duration of nonadherence event (the length of time the patient took to refill a prescription if the refill had been late), in days. | Participants were followed over a total of 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Probability of Physician Viewing Nonadherence Event Information | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which physicians viewed nonadherence event information. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE event notices viewed by the physician across all patients in each particular arm. |
Not provided
Physician Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criterion:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ira B Wilson, MD, MSc | Brown University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University | Providence | Rhode Island | 02913 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31835278 | Derived | McConnell M, Rogers W, Simeonova E, Wilson IB. Architecting Process of Care: A randomized controlled study evaluating the impact of providing nonadherence information and pharmacist assistance to physicians. Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb;55(1):136-145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13243. Epub 2019 Dec 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Both patients and doctors were enrolled in the study. Separate Periods represent the sequential nature of the study design: Period 1 includes physicians only. Only those patients with a nonadherence event were randomized to a control or intervention arm, so the number consented at launch (2,606) is higher than the number included in the study results (1,474). Patients were removed if insurance coverage expired or if their enrolled physician withdrew.
Physician recruitment with signed consent forms was in-person. 91 physicians were consented and enrolled at launch. All eligible patients were automatically enrolled, and mailed an opt-out card to be returned if participation was refused.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Default Patient Default Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call |
| FG001 | Information Patient Default Doctor |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Physician Randomization |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Aug 4, 2011 | Dec 13, 2021 |
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control patient choice doctor | No Intervention | Control - no intervention |
| Information patient information doctor | Experimental | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
|
| Control patient information doctor | No Intervention | Control - no intervention |
| Information doctor | Experimental | Physician receives nonadherence information, but there is no opportunity for pharmacist action |
|
| Choice doctor | Experimental | Physician receives nonadherence information, and can choose to request pharmacist action |
|
| Default doctor | Experimental | Physician receives nonadherence information; pharmacist action will be triggered unless physician cancels action |
|
| Behavioral |
|
| Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call | Behavioral |
|
| Doctor receives information and may be allowed certain actions | Behavioral |
|
| Participants were followed over a total of 6 months |
| Probability of Pharmacist Action Triggered | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which pharmacist action was triggered to resolve nonadherence. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE events which triggered pharmacist action across all patients in each particular arm. | Participants were followed over a total of 6 months |
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
| FG002 | Control Patient Default Doctor | Control - no intervention |
| FG003 | Choice Patient Choice Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call |
| FG004 | Information Patient Choice Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
| FG005 | Control Patient Choice Doctor | Control - no intervention |
| FG006 | Information Patient Information Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
| FG007 | Control Patient Information Doctor | Control - no intervention |
| FG008 | Information Doctor | Physician randomized to Information Only arm |
| FG009 | Default Doctor | Physician randomized to Default arm |
| FG010 | Choice Doctor | Physician randomized to Choice arm |
|
| COMPLETED | Patient participants are not included in this period. |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Post Nonadherence Subgroup Randomization |
|
Total is 1565, not 1564, because descriptive statistics were calculated for all physicians enrolled at randomization (91) rather than those enrolled at intervention (90)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Default Patient | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call |
| BG001 | Information Patient | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician |
| BG002 | Control Patient | Control - no intervention |
| BG003 | Choice Patient | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call |
| BG004 | Information Doctor | Physician randomized to information only arm |
| BG005 | Choice Doctor | Physician randomized to choice arm |
| BG006 | Default Doctor | Physician randomized to default arm |
| BG007 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | years | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Probability of Resolution of Nonadherence Within 30 Days | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which these patients have filled a prescription by 30 days. Outcome is 1 if the patient fills the prescription by 30 days (considered resolution of nonadherence); otherwise it is 0. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of nonadherence (NAE) events resolved within 30 days across all patients in each particular arm. | All Information Only patients are grouped together in these results (regardless of physician arm), because the treatment for all Information Only patients is identical across all physician arms. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Proportion of resolved NAEs within 30 | Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months. |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Duration of Nonadherence Event | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the duration of nonadherence event (the length of time the patient took to refill a prescription if the refill had been late), in days. | All Information Only patients are grouped together in these results (regardless of physician arm), because the treatment for all Information Only patients is identical across all physician arms. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Days | Participants were followed over a total of 6 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Probability of Physician Viewing Nonadherence Event Information | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which physicians viewed nonadherence event information. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE event notices viewed by the physician across all patients in each particular arm. | We excluded the Control group because we considered only claims where physicians assigned to a treatment arm would have been notified by email of nonadherence. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Proportion of NAEs viewed | Participants were followed over a total of 6 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Probability of Pharmacist Action Triggered | Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which pharmacist action was triggered to resolve nonadherence. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE events which triggered pharmacist action across all patients in each particular arm. | We considered only claims for patients who had been randomly assigned to intervention arms where the pharmacist was available - Default and Choice. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Proportion with pharmacist calls | Participants were followed over a total of 6 months |
|
|
From launch of study to end of study (6 months)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Default Patient Default Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call Patient nonadherence information sent to physician | 0 | 244 | 0 | 244 | 0 | 244 |
| EG001 | Information Patient Default Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician Patient nonadherence information sent to physician | 0 | 123 | 0 | 123 | 0 | 123 |
| EG002 | Control Patient Default Doctor | Control - no intervention | 0 | 121 | 0 | 121 | 0 | 121 |
| EG003 | Choice Patient Choice Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call Patient nonadherence information sent to physician Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call | 0 | 274 | 0 | 274 | 0 | 274 |
| EG004 | Information Patient Choice Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician Patient nonadherence information sent to physician | 0 | 134 | 0 | 134 | 0 | 134 |
| EG005 | Control Patient Choice Doctor | Control - no intervention | 0 | 137 | 0 | 137 | 0 | 137 |
| EG006 | Information Patient Information Doctor | Patient nonadherence information sent to physician Patient nonadherence information sent to physician | 0 | 220 | 0 | 220 | 0 | 220 |
| EG007 | Control Patient Information Doctor | Control - no intervention | 0 | 221 | 0 | 221 | 0 | 221 |
| EG008 | Information Doctor | Doctor receives information and may be allowed certain actions | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| EG009 | Choice Doctor | Doctor receives information and may be allowed certain actions | 0 | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| EG010 | Default Doctor | Doctor receives information and may be allowed certain actions | 0 | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
Not provided
Not provided
We partnered with only one insurer and pharmacy benefit manager and therefore had information on adherence for a subset of any physician's patients. We only had information on selected medications. We could only track patient outcomes related to adherence. Few patients actually received the pharmacist intervention. A relatively high share of patients opted out of the research. Our multilevel experimental design, with randomization occurring at both patient and physician levels, was complex.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joanne Michaud | Brown University | 401-863-9317 | joanne_michaud@brown.edu |
| ICF_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D006973 | Hypertension |
| D006937 | Hypercholesterolemia |
| D055118 | Medication Adherence |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D006949 | Hyperlipidemias |
| D050171 | Dyslipidemias |
| D052439 | Lipid Metabolism Disorders |
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| <0.01 |
| Risk Difference (RD) |
| -0.015 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.041 |
| 2-Sided |
Comparator is control arm |
| Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | <0.01 | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.012 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.029 | 2-Sided | Comparator is control arm | Superiority |
No information sent to physician, no opportunity for pharmacist intervention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|